Guang-Shu Yu1, Yan-Bin Lin2, Guo-Sheng Xiong1, Hong-Bin Xu3, You-Ying Liu3. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fu Zhou, 350007, Fujian, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fu Zhou, 350007, Fujian, People's Republic of China. 812953900@qq.com. 3. Graduate school, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fu Zhou, 350122, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tibiofibular syndesmosis injury leads to ankle pain and dysfunction when ankle injuries are not treated properly. Despite several studies having been performed, many questions about diagnosis and treatment remain unanswered, especially in ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations. METHODS: This review explores the mechanism of injury, clinical features, diagnosis methods, and the treatment strategy for ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury to highlight the current evidence in terms of the controversies surrounding the management of these injuries. RESULTS: Radiological and CT examination are an important basis for diagnosing ankle syndesmosis injury. Physical examination combined with MRI to determine the damage to the interosseous membrane is significant in guiding the treatment of ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury. In the past, inserting syndesmosis screws was the gold standard for treating ankle syndesmosis injury. However, there were increasingly more controversies regarding loss of reduction and broken nails, so elastic fixation has become more popular in recent years. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical reduction and effective fixation are the main aspects to be considered in the treatment of ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury and are the key to reducing postsurgery complications.
BACKGROUND: Tibiofibular syndesmosis injury leads to ankle pain and dysfunction when ankle injuries are not treated properly. Despite several studies having been performed, many questions about diagnosis and treatment remain unanswered, especially in ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations. METHODS: This review explores the mechanism of injury, clinical features, diagnosis methods, and the treatment strategy for ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury to highlight the current evidence in terms of the controversies surrounding the management of these injuries. RESULTS: Radiological and CT examination are an important basis for diagnosing ankle syndesmosis injury. Physical examination combined with MRI to determine the damage to the interosseous membrane is significant in guiding the treatment of ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury. In the past, inserting syndesmosis screws was the gold standard for treating ankle syndesmosis injury. However, there were increasingly more controversies regarding loss of reduction and broken nails, so elastic fixation has become more popular in recent years. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical reduction and effective fixation are the main aspects to be considered in the treatment of ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury and are the key to reducing postsurgery complications.
Authors: Robert W Westermann; Chamnanni Rungprai; Jessica E Goetz; John Femino; Annunziato Amendola; Phinit Phisitkul Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Nico Ng; James Randolph Onggo; Mithun Nambiar; Julian Tam Maingard; David Ng; Gaurav Gupta; Dee Nandurkar; Sina Babazadeh; Harvinder Bedi Journal: J Med Radiat Sci Date: 2022-05-03