Literature DB >> 2807106

Assessing fibular length using bimalleolar angular measurements.

B Rolfe1, W Nordt, J G Sallis, M Distefano.   

Abstract

Shortening of the fibula after fracture is common and often difficult to appreciate. Loss of lateral malleolar anatomy causes significant biomechanical changes in the ankle and correlates with poor clinical results. We studied angular measurements of distal fibular length to serve as a guide for assessing fibular reduction after ankle fracture. Mortise view X-rays of 50 normal ankles from 25 healthy volunteers were obtained. The average talocrural angle measured 78.5 degrees. However, individual variation was high with values ranging from 75 to 86 degrees. Comparing contralateral ankles demonstrated an average difference of 1.3 degrees (range 0 to 4 degrees). A new, simpler bimalleolar angle was devised which compares the long axis of the fibula with a line drawn between the tips of the malleoli. The average bimalleolar angle measured 77.8 degrees (range 72 to 86 degrees). The contralateral difference averaged 1.2 degrees (range 0 to 3 degrees). This angle was simpler to use and more reproducible. Angular measurements were tolerant of usual radiographic techniques. Internal or external rotation of the ankle up to 5 degrees caused an insignificant change in the angular measurements. One degree change in the talocrural or bimalleolar angle was found to correspond with a 1 mm change in fibular length for the average ankle, calculated radiographically and confirmed in a cadaver study. Abnormal fibular shortening is detected with an angular difference between injured and contralateral sides of 3.0 degrees using the talocrural angle or 2.5 degrees using the bimalleolar angle (95% confidence limits). Thus, a 2.5 to 3.0 degrees contralateral difference should serve as a minimum value required to direct a change in therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2807106     DOI: 10.1177/107110078901000210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle        ISSN: 0198-0211


  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review.

Authors:  Guang-Shu Yu; Yan-Bin Lin; Guo-Sheng Xiong; Hong-Bin Xu; You-Ying Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Can a fibular malunion be corrected by a Z-shaped fibular osteotomy?

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Timothy L Kahn; Graham Dekeyser; Yantarat Sripanich; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Reconstructive osteotomy of fibular malunion: review of the literature.

Authors:  Remco J A van Wensen; Michel P J van den Bekerom; René K Marti; Ronald J van Heerwaarden
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2011-04-06

4.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using the oblong hole of a locking plate for comminuted distal fibular fractures.

Authors:  Young Uk Park; Sung Jae Kim; Hyong Nyun Kim
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Fibular-Lengthening Osteotomy in Patient with Progressive Valgus Deformity After an Ankle Fracture.

Authors:  Juan Miguel Gómez-Palomo; Ana Martínez-Crespo; Inés Rodríguez-Delourme; Juan Ramón García-Pérez; Miguel Martínez-Espinosa; Elvira Montañez-Heredia
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-12

6.  Long-Term Follow-up of Functional and Radiographic Outcome After Revision Surgery for Fibula Malunion.

Authors:  Merel F N Birnie; Fay R K Sanders; Jens A Halm; Tim Schepers
Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec       Date:  2020-03-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.