STUDY OBJECTIVE: To conduct an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in emergency departments in the United States and Canada. DESIGN: A decision analytic approach to technology assessment. Clinical decision rules that allow physicians to be more selective in their use of radiography were compared with current practice in a decision analytic model. SETTING: A university hospital adult ED. PARTICIPANTS: ED physicians instructed in the use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for adult patients with ankle injury. RESULTS: Radiography, waiting time, lost productivity, and medicolegal costs were calculated. In the United States, the savings varied between US$614,226 and US$3,145,910 per 100,000 patients, depending on the charge rate for radiography. In Ontario, Canada, the total savings were CAN$730,145 per 100,000 patients. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses that varied the rate of missed fractures, cost of radiography, probability of lawsuits, and cost of lawsuits did not change the results substantially. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules would result in significant savings of health care dollars despite the cost of missed fractures including litigation costs.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To conduct an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in emergency departments in the United States and Canada. DESIGN: A decision analytic approach to technology assessment. Clinical decision rules that allow physicians to be more selective in their use of radiography were compared with current practice in a decision analytic model. SETTING: A university hospital adult ED. PARTICIPANTS: ED physicians instructed in the use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for adult patients with ankle injury. RESULTS: Radiography, waiting time, lost productivity, and medicolegal costs were calculated. In the United States, the savings varied between US$614,226 and US$3,145,910 per 100,000 patients, depending on the charge rate for radiography. In Ontario, Canada, the total savings were CAN$730,145 per 100,000 patients. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses that varied the rate of missed fractures, cost of radiography, probability of lawsuits, and cost of lawsuits did not change the results substantially. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules would result in significant savings of health care dollars despite the cost of missed fractures including litigation costs.
Authors: Pierre Côté; Jessica J Wong; Deborah Sutton; Heather M Shearer; Silvano Mior; Kristi Randhawa; Arthur Ameis; Linda J Carroll; Margareta Nordin; Hainan Yu; Gail M Lindsay; Danielle Southerst; Sharanya Varatharajan; Craig Jacobs; Maja Stupar; Anne Taylor-Vaisey; Gabrielle van der Velde; Douglas P Gross; Robert J Brison; Mike Paulden; Carlo Ammendolia; J David Cassidy; Patrick Loisel; Shawn Marshall; Richard N Bohay; John Stapleton; Michel Lacerte; Murray Krahn; Roger Salhany Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Hans Polzer; Karl Georg Kanz; Wolf Christian Prall; Florian Haasters; Ben Ockert; Wolf Mutschler; Stefan Grote Journal: Orthop Rev (Pavia) Date: 2011-12-14