Literature DB >> 27133871

Foraging Bumble Bees Weigh the Reliability of Personal and Social Information.

Aimee S Dunlap1, Matthew E Nielsen2, Anna Dornhaus3, Daniel R Papaj3.   

Abstract

Many animals, including insects, make decisions using both personally gathered information and social information derived from the behavior of other, usually conspecific, individuals [1]. Moreover, animals adjust use of social versus personal information appropriately under a variety of experimental conditions [2-5]. An important factor in how information is used is the information's reliability, that is, how consistently the information is correlated with something of relevance in the environment [6]. The reliability of information determines which signals should be attended to during communication [6-9], which types of stimuli animals should learn about, and even whether learning should evolve [10, 11]. Here, we show that bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) account for the reliability of personally acquired information (which flower color was previously associated with reward) and social information (which flowers are chosen by other bees) in making foraging decisions; however, the two types of information are not treated equally. Bees prefer to use social information if it predicts a reward at all, but if social information becomes entirely unreliable, flower color will be used instead. This greater sensitivity to the reliability of social information, and avoidance of conspecifics in some cases, may reflect the specific ecological circumstances of bee foraging. Overall, the bees' ability to make decisions based on both personally acquired and socially derived information, and the relative reliability of both, demonstrates a new level of sophistication and flexibility in animal, particularly insect, decision-making.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27133871     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  11 in total

1.  The multi-dimensional nature of information drives prioritization of private over social information in ants.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; John J Beckwith; Anna-Lena Horsch; Florian Hartig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A social insect perspective on the evolution of social learning mechanisms.

Authors:  Ellouise Leadbeater; Erika H Dawson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sampling and tracking a changing environment: persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees.

Authors:  Aimee S Dunlap; Daniel R Papaj; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Private but not social information validity modulates social conformity bias.

Authors:  Li Li; King King Li; Jian Li
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Memory and the value of social information in foraging bumble bees.

Authors:  Benjamin J Abts; Aimee S Dunlap
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 1.926

6.  Label-based expectations affect incentive contrast effects in bumblebees.

Authors:  Claire T Hemingway; Felicity Muth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.812

Review 7.  Beyond social learning.

Authors:  Manvir Singh; Alberto Acerbi; Christine A Caldwell; Étienne Danchin; Guillaume Isabel; Lucas Molleman; Thom Scott-Phillips; Monica Tamariz; Pieter van den Berg; Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Maxime Derex
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.671

8.  Cognitive ecology of pollinators and the main determinants of foraging plasticity.

Authors:  David Baracchi
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  Role of conspecifics and personal experience on behavioral avoidance of contaminated flowers by bumblebees.

Authors:  Bertrand Fouks; Emily G Robb; H Michael G Lattorff
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.624

10.  Commentary: Do Bees Play the Producer-Scrounger Game?

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Cristian Pasquaretta; Philipp Heeb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.