PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a pretherapy PET/CT-based prediction model for treatment response to ibrutinib in lymphoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-nine lymphoma patients with 2441 lesions were studied retrospectively. All eligible lymphomas on pretherapy 18F-FDG PET images were contoured and segmented for radiomic analysis. Lesion- and patient-based responsiveness to ibrutinib was determined retrospectively using the Lugano classification. PET radiomic features were extracted. A radiomic model was built to predict ibrutinib response. The prognostic significance of the radiomic model was evaluated independently in a test cohort and compared with conventional PET metrics: SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. RESULTS: The radiomic model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.860 (sensitivity, 92.9%, specificity, 81.4%; P < 0.001) for predicting response to ibrutinib, outperforming the SUVmax (ROC AUC, 0.519; P = 0.823), metabolic tumor volume (ROC AUC, 0.579; P = 0.412), total lesion glycolysis (ROC AUC, 0.576; P = 0.199), and a composite model built using all 3 (ROC AUC, 0.562; P = 0.046). The radiomic model increased the probability of accurately predicting ibrutinib-responsive lesions from 84.8% (pretest) to 96.5% (posttest). At the patient level, the model's performance (ROC AUC = 0.811; P = 0.007) was superior to that of conventional PET metrics. Furthermore, the radiomic model showed robustness when validated in treatment subgroups: first (ROC AUC, 0.916; P < 0.001) versus second or greater (ROC AUC, 0.842; P < 0.001) line of defense and single treatment (ROC AUC, 0.931; P < 0.001) versus multiple treatments (ROC AUC, 0.824; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a pretherapy PET-based radiomic model to predict response to treatment with ibrutinib in a diverse cohort of lymphoma patients.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a pretherapy PET/CT-based prediction model for treatment response to ibrutinib in lymphoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-nine lymphoma patients with 2441 lesions were studied retrospectively. All eligible lymphomas on pretherapy 18F-FDG PET images were contoured and segmented for radiomic analysis. Lesion- and patient-based responsiveness to ibrutinib was determined retrospectively using the Lugano classification. PET radiomic features were extracted. A radiomic model was built to predict ibrutinib response. The prognostic significance of the radiomic model was evaluated independently in a test cohort and compared with conventional PET metrics: SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. RESULTS: The radiomic model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.860 (sensitivity, 92.9%, specificity, 81.4%; P < 0.001) for predicting response to ibrutinib, outperforming the SUVmax (ROC AUC, 0.519; P = 0.823), metabolic tumor volume (ROC AUC, 0.579; P = 0.412), total lesion glycolysis (ROC AUC, 0.576; P = 0.199), and a composite model built using all 3 (ROC AUC, 0.562; P = 0.046). The radiomic model increased the probability of accurately predicting ibrutinib-responsive lesions from 84.8% (pretest) to 96.5% (posttest). At the patient level, the model's performance (ROC AUC = 0.811; P = 0.007) was superior to that of conventional PET metrics. Furthermore, the radiomic model showed robustness when validated in treatment subgroups: first (ROC AUC, 0.916; P < 0.001) versus second or greater (ROC AUC, 0.842; P < 0.001) line of defense and single treatment (ROC AUC, 0.931; P < 0.001) versus multiple treatments (ROC AUC, 0.824; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a pretherapy PET-based radiomic model to predict response to treatment with ibrutinib in a diverse cohort of lymphoma patients.
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; Richard I Fisher; Sally F Barrington; Franco Cavalli; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; T Andrew Lister Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrei Pugachev; Shutian Ruan; Sean Carlin; Steven M Larson; Jose Campa; C Clifton Ling; John L Humm Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jia Wu; Chao Li; Michael Gensheimer; Sukhmani Padda; Fumi Kato; Hiroki Shirato; Yiran Wei; Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb; Stephen John Price; David Jaffray; John Heymach; Joel W Neal; Billy W Loo; Heather Wakelee; Maximilian Diehn; Ruijiang Li Journal: Nat Mach Intell Date: 2021-08-09
Authors: Melissa M Chen; Admir Terzic; Anton S Becker; Jason M Johnson; Carol C Wu; Max Wintermark; Christoph Wald; Jia Wu Journal: Eur J Radiol Open Date: 2022-09-29