Literature DB >> 26936027

Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study.

Brian O'Sullivan1, Shao Hui Huang2, Jie Su2, Adam S Garden3, Erich M Sturgis3, Kristina Dahlstrom3, Nancy Lee4, Nadeem Riaz4, Xin Pei4, Shlomo A Koyfman5, David Adelstein5, Brian B Burkey5, Jeppe Friborg6, Claus A Kristensen6, Anita B Gothelf6, Frank Hoebers7, Bernd Kremer7, Ernst-Jan Speel7, Daniel W Bowles8, David Raben8, Sana D Karam8, Eugene Yu2, Wei Xu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus-related (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer is a rapidly emerging disease with generally good prognosis. Many prognostic algorithms for oropharyngeal cancer incorporate HPV status as a stratification factor, rather than recognising the uniqueness of HPV+ disease. The International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S) aimed to develop a TNM classification specific to HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer.
METHODS: The ICON-S study included patients with non-metastatic oropharyngeal cancer from seven cancer centres located across Europe and North America; one centre comprised the training cohort and six formed the validation cohorts. We ascertained patients' HPV status with p16 staining or in-situ hybridisation. We compared overall survival at 5 years between training and validation cohorts according to 7th edition TNM classifications and HPV status. We used recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) modelling methods to derive new staging classifications for HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer. Recent hypotheses concerning the effect of lower neck lymph nodes and number of lymph nodes were also investigated in an exploratory training cohort to assess relevance within the ICON-S classification.
FINDINGS: Of 1907 patients with HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer, 661 (35%) were recruited at the training centre and 1246 (65%) were enrolled at the validation centres. 5-year overall survival was similar for 7th edition TNM stage I, II, III, and IVA (respectively; 88% [95% CI 74-100]; 82% [71-95]; 84% [79-89]; and 81% [79-83]; global p=0·25) but was lower for stage IVB (60% [53-68]; p<0·0001). 5-year overall survival did not differ among N0 (80% [95% CI 73-87]), N1-N2a (87% [83-90]), and N2b (83% [80-86]) subsets, but was significantly lower for those with N3 disease (59% [51-69]; p<0·0001). Stage classifications derived by RPA and AHR models were ranked according to survival performance, and AHR-New was ranked first, followed by AHR-Orig, RPA, and 7th edition TNM. AHR-New was selected as the proposed ICON-S stage classification. Because 5-year overall survival was similar for patients classed as T4a and T4b, T4 is no longer subdivided in the re-termed ICON-S T categories. Since 5-year overall survival was similar among N1, N2a, and N2b, we re-termed the 7th edition N categories as follows: ICON-S N0, no lymph nodes; ICON-S N1, ipsilateral lymph nodes; ICON-S N2, bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes; and ICON-S N3, lymph nodes larger than 6 cm. This resembles the N classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma but without a lower neck lymph node variable. The proposed ICON-S classification is stage I (T1-T2N0-N1), stage II (T1-T2N2 or T3N0-N2), and stage III (T4 or N3). Metastatic disease (M1) is classified as ICON-S stage IV. In an exploratory training cohort (n=702), lower lymph node neck involvement had a significant effect on survival in ICON-S stage III but had no effect in ICON-S stage I and II and was not significant as an independent factor. Overall survival was similar for patients with fewer than five lymph nodes and those with five or more lymph nodes, within all ICON-S stages.
INTERPRETATION: Our proposed ICON-S staging system for HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer is suitable for the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification. Future work is needed to ascertain whether T and N categories should be further refined and whether non-anatomical factors might augment the full classification. FUNDING: None.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936027     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00560-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  169 in total

1.  Quantitative lymph node burden as a 'very-high-risk' factor identifying head and neck cancer patients benefiting from postoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Z S Zumsteg; M Luu; S Kim; M Tighiouart; A Mita; K S Scher; D J Lu; S L Shiao; J Mallen-St Clair; A S Ho
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  [The 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual : Updates in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery].

Authors:  J Doescher; J A Veit; T K Hoffmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Comparison of high-dose Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy and Cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the context of revised HPV-based staging.

Authors:  Bhattasali Onita; Thompson Lester D R; Abdalla Iman A; Chen Jergin; Iganej Shawn
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-09-07

4.  Tumor Subregion Evolution-Based Imaging Features to Assess Early Response and Predict Prognosis in Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Michael F Gensheimer; Nasha Zhang; Meiying Guo; Rachel Liang; Carrie Zhang; Nancy Fischbein; Erqi L Pollom; Beth Beadle; Quynh-Thu Le; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Paired phase II trials evaluating cetuximab and radiotherapy for low risk HPV associated oropharyngeal cancer and locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in patients not eligible for cisplatin.

Authors:  Paul L Swiecicki; Pin Li; Emily Bellile; Chaz Stucken; Kelly Malloy; Andrew Shuman; Matthew E Spector; Steven Chinn; Keith Casper; Scott McLean; Jeffery Moyer; Douglas Chepeha; Gregory T Wolf; Mark Prince; Carol Bradford; Mukesh Nyati; Avraham Eisbruch; Francis P Worden; Shruti Jolly; Michelle Mierzwa
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 6.  Prevalence and Impact of Human Papillomavirus on Head and Neck Cancers: Review of Indian Studies.

Authors:  Deepa Nair; Manish Mair; Arjun Singh; Anil D'Cruz
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-03

Review 7.  HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer: a review on burden of the disease and opportunities for prevention and early detection.

Authors:  Mary Roz Timbang; Michael W Sim; Arnaud F Bewley; D Gregory Farwell; Avinash Mantravadi; Michael G Moore
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Treatment de-intensification strategies for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Kelly; Zain A Husain; Barbara Burtness
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  Deintensification of treatment for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer: Current state and future directions.

Authors:  Elaine O Bigelow; Tanguy Y Seiwert; Carole Fakhry
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 10.  Optimizing Treatment De-Escalation in Head and Neck Cancer: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ari J Rosenberg; Everett E Vokes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.