Literature DB >> 27043927

Prognostic value of midtreatment FDG-PET in oropharyngeal cancer.

Erqi L Pollom1, Jie Song2, Benjamin Y Durkee2, Sonya Aggarwal2, Timothy Bui2, Rie von Eyben2, Ruijiang Li2, David M Brizel3, Billy W Loo2, Quynh-Thu Le2, Wendy Y Hara2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognostic metabolic imaging indices are needed for risk stratification for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined pretreatment and midtreatment fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) parameters in patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer who were treated with definitive chemoradiation.
RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were evaluated. Pretreatment metabolic tumor volume (MTV) using threshold of 50% standardized uptake value (SUV) maximum (MTV50% ) was associated with progression-free survival (PFS; p = .003; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57 per 10 cc; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-2.11) and overall survival (OS; p = .01; HR = 1.36 per 10 cc; 95% CI = 1.07-1.74). Midtreatment MTV using a threshold of SUV 2.0 (MTV2.0 ) was associated with PFS (p < .001; HR = 1.24 per 10 cc; 95% CI = 1.10-1.39) and OS (p = .009; HR = 1.21 per 10 cc; 95% CI = 1.05-1.39). Nodal total lesion glycolysis (TLG) velocity >5% decrease/week was associated with improved PFS (p = .04; HR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.15-0.95).
CONCLUSION: Metabolic response during chemoradiation is associated with survival in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer and may aid with risk-adapting treatment.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: First-1478, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  combined modality therapy; human papillomavirus (HPV); oropharyngeal neoplasms; positron-emission tomography; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27043927     DOI: 10.1002/hed.24454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  10 in total

1.  Tumor Subregion Evolution-Based Imaging Features to Assess Early Response and Predict Prognosis in Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Michael F Gensheimer; Nasha Zhang; Meiying Guo; Rachel Liang; Carrie Zhang; Nancy Fischbein; Erqi L Pollom; Beth Beadle; Quynh-Thu Le; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Integrating Tumor and Nodal Imaging Characteristics at Baseline and Mid-Treatment Computed Tomography Scans to Predict Distant Metastasis in Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Micheal F Gensheimer; Nasha Zhang; Fei Han; Rachel Liang; Yushen Qian; Carrie Zhang; Nancy Fischbein; Erqi L Pollom; Beth Beadle; Quynh-Thu Le; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Adaptive Boost Target Definition in High-Risk Head and Neck Cancer Based on Multi-imaging Risk Biomarkers.

Authors:  Feifei Teng; Madhava Aryal; Jae Lee; Choonik Lee; Xioajin Shen; Peter G Hawkins; Michelle Mierzwa; Avraham Eisbruch; Yue Cao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Volumetric 18 F-FDG-PET parameters as predictors of locoregional failure in low-risk HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Thong Chotchutipan; Benjamin S Rosen; Peter G Hawkins; Jae Y Lee; Anjali L Saripalli; Dharmesh Thakkar; Avraham Eisbruch; Issam El Naqa; Michelle L Mierzwa
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Early HPV ctDNA Kinetics and Imaging Biomarkers Predict Therapeutic Response in p16+ Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Catherine T Haring; Michelle Mierzwa; J Chad Brenner; Collin Brummel; Chandan Bhambhani; Madhava Aryal; Choonik Lee; Molly Heft Neal; Apurva Bhangale; Wenjin Gu; Keith Casper; Kelly Malloy; Yilun Sun; Andrew Shuman; Mark E Prince; Matthew E Spector; Steven Chinn; Jennifer Shah; Caitlin Schonewolf; Jonathan B McHugh; Ryan E Mills; Muneesh Tewari; Francis P Worden; Paul L Swiecicki
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 6.  The Practicality of ICRU and Considerations for Future ICRU Definitions.

Authors:  Annemarie Shepherd; Sara St James; Ramesh Rengan
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.934

7.  Intrinsic radiomic expression patterns after 20 Gy demonstrate early metabolic response of oropharyngeal cancers.

Authors:  Kyle J Lafata; Yushi Chang; Chunhao Wang; Yvonne M Mowery; Irina Vergalasova; Donna Niedzwiecki; David S Yoo; Jian-Guo Liu; David M Brizel; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.506

8.  Prognostic value of FDG PET/CT during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Suzy Kim; Sowon Oh; Jin Soo Kim; Yu Kyeong Kim; Kwang Hyun Kim; Do Hoon Oh; Dong-Han Lee; Woo-Jin Jeong; Young Ho Jung
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2018-06-29

9.  Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16- High Risk Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Madhava Aryal; Pin Li; Choonik Lee; Matthew Schipper; Peter G Hawkins; Christina Chapman; Dawn Owen; Aleksandar F Dragovic; Paul Swiecicki; Keith Casper; Francis Worden; Theodore S Lawrence; Avraham Eisbruch; Michelle Mierzwa
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Development and Assessment of a Model for Predicting Individualized Outcomes in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Lauren J Beesley; Andrew G Shuman; Michelle L Mierzwa; Emily L Bellile; Benjamin S Rosen; Keith A Casper; Mohannad Ibrahim; Sarah M Dermody; Gregory T Wolf; Steven B Chinn; Matthew E Spector; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Emilie A C Dronkers; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.