| Literature DB >> 31412601 |
Rosilene V Ribeiro1,2, Samantha M Solon-Biet3,4,5, Tamara Pulpitel6,7, Alistair M Senior6,7, Victoria C Cogger7,8, Ximonie Clark6,7, John O'Sullivan7,9, Yen Chin Koay7,9, Vasant Hirani6,7,10, Fiona M Blyth11, Markus J Seibel8,11,12, Louise M Waite10, Vasi Naganathan11, Robert G Cumming13,10, David J Handelsman12, Stephen J Simpson6,7, David G Le Couteur6,7,8,14.
Abstract
Protein and branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) intake are associated with changes in circulating BCAAs and influence metabolic health in humans and rodents. However, the relationship between BCAAs and body composition in both species is unclear, with many studies questioning the translatability of preclinical findings to humans. Here, we assessed and directly compared the relationship between circulating BCAAs, body composition, and intake in older mice and men. Body weight and body fat were positively associated with circulating BCAA levels in both mouse and human, which remained significant after adjustments for age, physical activity, number of morbidities, smoking status, and source of income in the human cohort. Macronutrient intakes were similarly associated with circulating BCAA levels; however, the relationship between protein intake and BCAAs were more pronounced in the mice. These findings indicate that the relationship between circulating BCAAs, body composition, and intakes are comparable in both species, suggesting that the mouse is an effective model for examining the effects of BCAAs on body composition in older humans.Entities:
Keywords: ageing; body composition; branched-chain amino acids; humans; mice
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31412601 PMCID: PMC6723310 DOI: 10.3390/nu11081882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Circulating branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) and body composition in older men and mice. Red lines represent fitted values and blue dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Body weight (kg), body fat (% and kg), and body lean (% and kg) were significantly associated with circulating BCAAs in men (A–F) and mice (G–L). Correlation matrices show similar results in both men (F) and mice (L): Energy, protein, and fat intake passively correlated with BCAAs whereas carbohydrate negatively correlated with BCAAs.
Regression coefficients (and SE) for change in body composition and macronutrient intake per unit of BCAA.
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Model 1 | 0.16 (0.02) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.15 (0.03) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 0.15 (0.03) | <0.001 |
|
| ||
| Model 1 | 0.10 (0.02) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.10 (0.02) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 0.10 (0.02) | <0.001 |
|
| ||
| Model 1 | 0.13 (0.02) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.10 (0.02) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 0.11 (0.02) | <0.001 |
|
| ||
| Model 1 | −0.10 (0.02) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | −0.10 (0.02) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | −0.10 (0.02) | <0.001 |
|
| ||
| Model 1 | 0.33 (0.04) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.28 (0.04) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 0.30 (0.04) | <0.001 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Model 1 | 0.14 (0.11) | 0.24 |
|
| ||
| Model 1 | 0.11 (0.19) | 0.55 |
|
| ||
| Model 1 | 0.2 (0.07) | 0.01 |
|
| ||
| Model 1 | −0.07 (0.17) | 0.67 |
|
| ||
| Model 1 | 0.34 (0.16) | 0.04 |
Model 1 was unadjusted (humans and mice). Model 2 was adjusted for age. Model 3 was adjusted for age plus physical activity, number of morbidities, smoking status, and source of income.
Figure 2Circulating BCAA (branched chain amino acid) vs. nutrient intake in older men (A–E) and mice (F–J). Red lines represent fitted values and blue dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. In both humans and mice, protein intake was associated with higher circulating BCAAs (B,G). Men who consumed a diet high in fat were more likely to have higher circulating BCAAs (C). Correlation matrices show a similar pattern of correlation between dietary intakes and individual BCAAs in both men (E) and mice (J).