Christoph Patsch1, Ludivine Challet-Meylan2, Eva C Thoma1, Eduard Urich1, Tobias Heckel1, John F O'Sullivan3, Stephanie J Grainger4, Friedrich G Kapp5, Lin Sun3, Klaus Christensen1, Yulei Xia2, Mary H C Florido2, Wei He1, Wei Pan1, Michael Prummer1, Curtis R Warren2, Roland Jakob-Roetne1, Ulrich Certa1, Ravi Jagasia1, Per-Ola Freskgård1, Isaac Adatto3, Dorothee Kling1, Paul Huang3, Leonard I Zon6, Elliot L Chaikof4, Robert E Gerszten3, Martin Graf1, Roberto Iacone1, Chad A Cowan7. 1. Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland. 2. Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Massachusetts 02138, USA. 3. Cardiovascular Research Center and Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. 4. 1] Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street, Suite 9F Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [2] The Wyss Institute of Biologically Inspired Engineering of Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. 5. Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. 6. 1] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Massachusetts 02138, USA [2] Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. 7. 1] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Massachusetts 02138, USA [2] Cardiovascular Research Center and Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA [3] Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Abstract
The use of human pluripotent stem cells for in vitro disease modelling and clinical applications requires protocols that convert these cells into relevant adult cell types. Here, we report the rapid and efficient differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. We found that GSK3 inhibition and BMP4 treatment rapidly committed pluripotent cells to a mesodermal fate and subsequent exposure to VEGF-A or PDGF-BB resulted in the differentiation of either endothelial or vascular smooth muscle cells, respectively. Both protocols produced mature cells with efficiencies exceeding 80% within six days. On purification to 99% via surface markers, endothelial cells maintained their identity, as assessed by marker gene expression, and showed relevant in vitro and in vivo functionality. Global transcriptional and metabolomic analyses confirmed that the cells closely resembled their in vivo counterparts. Our results suggest that these cells could be used to faithfully model human disease.
The use of human pluripotent stem cells for in vitro disease modelling and clinical applications requires protocols that convert these cells into relevant adult cell types. Here, we report the rapid and efficient differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. We found that GSK3 inhibition and BMP4 treatment rapidly committed pluripotent cells to a mesodermal fate and subsequent exposure to VEGF-A or PDGF-BB resulted in the differentiation of either endothelial or vascular smooth muscle cells, respectively. Both protocols produced mature cells with efficiencies exceeding 80% within six days. On purification to 99% via surface markers, endothelial cells maintained their identity, as assessed by marker gene expression, and showed relevant in vitro and in vivo functionality. Global transcriptional and metabolomic analyses confirmed that the cells closely resembled their in vivo counterparts. Our results suggest that these cells could be used to faithfully model human disease.
Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs)[12,3] have unlimited proliferation capacity and the potential to differentiate into all somatic cell types. Ideally, they can be used to generate an inexhaustible supply of cells for clinical and scientific applications. Patient–specific hPSCs promise to reveal the molecular and genetic basis of disease. However, a prerequisite for exploiting their potential to understand disease is the development of strategies for directing their differentiation into functional adult cell types [4-6]. In addition to being reproducible, simple and quick, ideal differentiation strategies would yield pure populations of cells in sufficient quantities to enable high-throughput screening and large-scale analyses. Thus, a major obstacle for using hPSCs to model disease remains the lack of reliable, efficient and scalable protocols to differentiate functionally mature adult cell types.Blood vessels deliver oxygen and nutrients to all of the tissues and organs in the body. The two major cellular components of blood vessels are endothelial cells (ECs) and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Both ECs and VSMCs are required for vascular function, including blood pressure control, interactions with immune cells, and the uptake of nutrients. Consequently, these cells are involved in a variety of pathological dysfunctions, including the most common cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis. To date, there exist two commonly used methods to induce vascular cell differentiation from hPSCs: 1) embryoid body (EB) formation [7,8] and 2) monolayer-directed differentiation [9,10]. EB formation results in differentiation of hPSCs into various cell types, including vascular cells, albeit inefficiently (1%–5%) [7,11,12]. Moreover, EB differentiation is often time-consuming, with peak expression of endothelial genes occurring after 10–15 days [13]. Current monolayer differentiation methods offer increased efficiencies (5–20%) but depend on undefined supplements, co-culture [10,14,15], heterogeneous cell aggregates [16], conditioned medium [9,17], or lack consistent yields of vascular cells [18]. Thus, improved methods would increase differentiation fidelity, efficiency and kinetics.In mammalian development, vascular progenitors emerge from the lateral and posterior mesoderm [19]. Several studies describe the importance of canonical Wnt signaling in mesoderm commitment during embryogenesis [20]. For example, mice with impaired Wnt signaling lack mesoderm [21,22]. Canonical Wnt signaling in hPSCs induces mesendoderm [23], cardiogenesis [24] and the formation of vascular cells[16]. Based on previous reports[25, 26,27] we sought to develop a protocol for the differentiation of hPSCs to vascular cells. Here, we describe the rapid and efficient conversion of hPSCs into vascular cells using chemically defined conditions. Our protocol utilizes GSK3 inhibition and BMP4 treatment to convert hPSCs into mesodermal cells that when exposed to VEGF or PDGF-BB produced functional ECs or VSMCs.
Results
Canonical Wnt activation and mesoderm induction by pharmacological inhibition of GSK3
Wnt signaling directs differentiation of hPSCs into mesoderm and GSK3ß inhibition activates this pathway [16,23]. However, small molecule inhibitors of GSK3 can either promote self-renewal or mesendodermal differentiation of hPSCs [16,28,29]. We therefore attempted to identify selective GSK3ß inhibitors that promoted efficient commitment of hPSCs towards mesoderm. A panel of GSK3 inhibitors was evaluated for their selectivity and potential to inhibit GSK3 and to activate Wnt signaling (Supplementary Table 1).An in vitro competition binding assay against 96 protein kinases was performed to evaluate the specificity of GSK3 inhibitors, including 6-bromoindirubin-3′-oxime (BIO), CHIR-99021 (CHIR) [30], SB216763 [31] and a Roche compound, CP21R7 (CP21) (Supplementary Figure 1A). CP21 and CHIR were the most selective GSK3 inhibitors (Supplementary Table 2). CP21 also showed the highest affinity to GSK3ß followed by the CHIR (Supplementary Figure 1D). These findings indicate that CP21 and CHIR are high-affinity, selective GSK3ß inhibitors.To examine these compounds capacity to activate canonical Wnt signaling, a dose-response assay was performed using a reporter cell line [32] with the luciferase gene expressed by a TCF/LEF promoter (Supplementary Figure 1B). Compound CP21, BIO and CHIR were able to potently activate canonical Wnt signaling with highest activity at 3μM (CP21, BIO) and 10μM (CHIR). In contrast, the compoundsSB, AR-AO14418 and MeBIO did not induce TCF/LEF luciferase expression (Figure 1A). The increase in TCF/LEF::luciferase activation by GSK3 inhibitors was not due to global transcriptional activation as measured in Gli-luciferase responsive reporter cells (Supplementary Figure 1C). Furthermore, the compounds did not affect cell viability except BIO, which was toxic at concentrations above 3 μM (Supplementary Figures 1C and 1E). Thus, CP21, CHIR and BIO were able to activate canonical WNT signaling to similar levels, but given the toxicity of BIO we chose not to include this compound in subsequent experiments. Next, we analyzed protein levels of ß-catenin in hPSCs treated with CP21 and CHIR. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that CP21 and CHIR significantly increased total levels of intracellular ß-catenin (Figure 1B). This result was confirmed by gene expression analyses (Figure 1C), wherein Wnt target genes were upregulated following CP21 and CHIR treatment of hPSCs. Thus, CP21 and CHIR potently and selectively inhibit GSK3 to activate canonical Wnt signaling.
Figure 1
Canonical Wnt activation by GSK3ß inhibitors and mesoderm induction
(A) Luciferase assay of the ß-catenin promoter activity after treatment with increasing concentrations of GSK3ß inhibitors. A 6-point 3-fold serial dilution of each compound was performed (10, 3, 1, 0.3, 0.1, 0.03 μM, last 2 concentration data not shown). Columns show means +/− SD of 5 independent experiments. (B) Immunofluorescent localization of ß-catenin in hPSCs after a 24 hours treatment with either CP21 or CHIR. Representative image shown of 3 independent experiments on 3 different wells per condition. Scale bars: 50 μM (C) Quantitative PCR of ß-catenin target genes upon treatment of hPSCs with CP21 or CHIR. Results shown are means and SEM of 3 independent experiments with 3 biological and technical replicates for each gene. (D) Immunofluorescence staining of hPSCs for markers of pluripotency, mesoderm and endoderm during the first 4 days of differentiation. Representative image shown of 3 independent experiments on 3 different wells per condition. Scale bars: 50 μM.
We next investigated whether GSK3 inhibition with CP21 and CHIR in hPSCs would induce mesoderm. As BMP4 is also a potent inducer of mesoderm [33], we tested BMP4 alone or combined with WNT activation by CP21 and CHIR. Gene expression analyses revealed that BMP4 treatment with WNT activation led to upregulation of genes associated with mesoderm, such as T, MIXL, and EOMES (Supplementary Figure 2A). Immunostaining of CP21 and BMP4 treated cells showed high levels of BRACHYURY (T) expression which peaked at day three (Figure 1D). Conversely, OCT4 was downregulated. SOX17 was not detected indicating that the cells were likely mesodermal (Figure 1D). Similar results were obtained using CHIR and BMP4 (Figure 1D). Thus, activation of WNT signaling via GSK3 inhibition with CP21 or CHIR combined with BMP4 induced commitment of hPSCs towards mesoderm.
Efficient differentiation of mesodermal progenitors to endothelial cells or vascular smooth muscle cells
We assessed the ability of hPSC-derived mesoderm to undergo vascular lineage commitment using a chemically defined protocol consisting of three steps. First, hPSCs were plated as single cells at a density of 37,000 cells per cm2 with Rho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632 [34], second, cells were differentiated to mesoderm using either CP21 or CHIR and/or BMP4, and third, they were treated with VEGF to induce ECs [16]. At day five, EC differentiation was evaluated by analyzing the expression of vascular endothelial-cadherin (VE-Cadherin, CD144). CD144+ cells were readily detected in CHIR and CP21 treated cultures, but were absent in controls (Supplementary Figure 2B). Flow cytometric analysis of CD144 expression revealed that only BMP4 and CP21 or CHIR combined were capable of inducing high levels of expression, whereas treatment with BMP4 alone led to fewer than 10% CD144+ cells (Supplementary Figure 2C). Additional analysis identified CP21 as the most potent compound (Supplementary Figure 2D) with a concentration of 1μM yielding up to 35% CD144+ cells, whereas CHIR induced CD144 expression most efficiently at a concentration of 6μM. When either GSK3 inhibitor was used at its optimal concentration the yield of CD144+ cells was equivalent (Supplementary Figure 2E).We next combined VEGF treatment with Forskolin for two days, as protein kinase A activation via cyclic AMP leads to an increase in vascular development [35], followed by VEGF treatment alone for an additional four days (Supplementary Figure 2F). We tested this strategy on several hPSC lines, including HUES9, SA001, BJ-RiPS, and a commercially available iPS cell line [3637]. This protocol promoted the differentiation of hPSCs into endothelial cells with efficiencies between 61.8% and 88.8% (SEM 3.1, n=10 independent experiments) as assessed by flow cytometry of CD144+ cells (Figure 2A, B and Supplementary Table 4A). CD144+ cells were further analyzed for expression of EC specific markers. Flow cytometry revealed hPSC-derived ECs expressed KDR, CD31, CD34, and CD105. Expression of the hematopoietic lineage markers CD43 and CD45 was not detected (Supplementary Figure 2G). Immunostaining revealed that the cells were also positive for EC markers vWF and PECAM1 (Figure 2C). Overall, these results demonstrate that GSK3 inhibition and BMP4 treatment followed by a brief period VEGF and Forskolin exposure and continued VEGF treatment is sufficient to rapidly and efficiently induce ECs from hPSCs (Figure 2E).
Figure 2
VEGF and PDGF-BB-mediated differentiation of hPSCs into vascular endothelial or vascular smooth muscle cells
(A) Differentiation efficiency of hPSC-ECs and hPSC-VSMCs from four different hESCs and iPSCs lines, (SEM 3.1, n=10 independent differentiation experiments) for hPSC-ECs and (SEM 2.7, n=16 independent differentiation experiments) for hPSC-VSMCs. Columns show means +/− SEM (B) Representative FACs plots from the differentiation experiments described in A): hPSCs (top panel) hPSC-derived ECs (middle panel) or hPSC-derived VSMCs (lower panel) stained for CD144 and CD140b. n= 10 (hPSC-ECs) and 16 (hPSC-VSMCs) independent differentiation experiments (C) Immunostaining of EC-specific markers on hPSC-ECs; vWF=Von Willebrand factor. All cells (100%) were expressing VE-CAdherin and PECAM1 for both GSK3 inhibitors. 73.48% of the hPSC-ECs differentiated with CHIR and 74.52% of the cells differentiated with CP21 express vWF. Representative image shown of 3 independent experiments on 3 different wells per marker. Scale bars: 50 μM. (D) Immunostaining of VSMCs-specific markers on hPSC-VSMCs; SMA=smooth muscle actin alpha. For CHIR 48% of cells expressed SMA, 96.99% Myosin IIB and 98.7% SM22a. For CP21 62.08% of cells expressed SMA, 92.75% Myosin IIB and 100% SM22a. Representative image shown of 3 independent experiments. Scale bars: 50 μM. (E) Schematic illustration of EC differentiation strategy for hPSCs. (F) Schematic illustration of VSMCs differentiation strategy for hPSCs.
Interestingly, immunostaining revealed that in addition to ECs a small fraction of cells expressed the vascular smooth muscle marker smooth muscle-actin (SMA) (Supplementary Figure 2H). We reasoned that replacing endothelial inductive cues with factors that promote VSMC formation we might efficiently generate VSMCs. ActivinA and PDGF-BB have been shown to promote the formation of VSMCs [383940]. Thus, we added ActivinA and/or PDGF-BB following mesoderm induction. Strikingly, this modification resulted in the formation of almost exclusively CD140b+ (PDGFRB) cells with virtually no CD144+ cells detectable when ActivinA and PDGF-BB were used (Figure 2A, B and Supplementary Figure 2I and 2J). The differentiation of CD140b+ cells required either CP21 or CHIR and was not induced following treatment with BMP4 alone (Supplementary Figure 2K). The cells also expressed other markers of VSMCs, such as SMA and Myosin IIB (Figure 2D). The efficiency of differentiation of VSMCs was similar across hPSC lines, with on average 95.4% CD140b+ cells generated (SEM 2.7, n=16 independent experiments) (Supplementary Table 4B). Thus, GSK3 inhibition and BMP4 treatment followed by ActivinA and PDGF-BB treatment rapidly and efficiently induced VSMCs from hPSCs (Figure 2F).To purify hPSC-derived ECs, we performed magnetic associated cell sorting (MACS) at day six of differentiation. After MACS-mediated selection for CD144 expressing cells, we obtained virtually pure (on average 95.9%, SEM 3.0, n=19 independent experiments) EC cultures (Supplementary Figure 2L and Supplementary Table 4C). As hPSC-VSMCs cultures were nearly homogeneous they required no further purification.A step-by-step protocol describing the culture of hESCs and the differentiation of hPSC-ECs (doi:10.1038/protex.2015.055) and hPSC-VSMCs (doi:10.1038/protex.2015.056) can be found at Nature Protocol Exchange.
hPSCs-derived ECs and VSMCs display a transcriptional signature similar to primary vascular cells
To evaluate hPSC-derived vascular cells and monitor differentiation dynamics on a molecular level, we performed gene expression profiling at seven time points during differentiation. A projection of the complete expression profiles onto the first two principal components following principle component analysis revealed that differentiating cells cluster until day 4 with hPSCs. However, upon induction into ECs or VSMCs, the cells became highly similar to their corresponding primary cells as shown by principal component projections after two weeks of differentiation (Supplementary Figure 3A). This similarity is also reflected by the Pearson correlation coefficient for all expressed genes between primary and hPSC-derived ECs (r = 0.93) or primary and hPSC-derived VSMCs (r = 0.88). Of note, cultured primary cells do not perfectly mimic their in vivo counterparts.To examine mesoderm commitment a time-course of gene expression was plotted for representative genes from pluripotent cells, mesoderm, neuroectoderm, endoderm, endothelium and regionalization of the primitive streak (Supplementary Figure 3B). These analyses revealed that pluripotent cell markers such as NANOG, UTF1 and SOX2 were rapidly down-regulated. OCT4 expression was less rapidly down-regulated and decreased by day 10. We observed a transient activation of the genes found in mesoderm, such as MIXL1, T/BRACHYURY, FGF4 and EOMES. With the exception of the endodermal marker SOX17, which was highly expressed at day five of EC differentiation, expression of markers associated with neuroectoderm or endoderm was not observed. Expression of SOX17 mimics the in vivo pattern found in the developing and adult vasculature [41]. We did not observe differentiation of trophectoderm or visceral endoderm, as ESX1 and SOX7 were undetectable. These data support the differentiation of hPSCs via a mesodermal intermediate into ECs or VSMCs.We found that 2955 genes were differentially expressed by at least 10-fold between hPSCs, differentiated ECs, VSMCs and primary cells (Figure 3A). These genes were hierarchically clustered and analyzed on the basis of Gene Ontology (GO) terms using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resource. The most prominently enriched gene sets included annotations for blood vessel development (GO:0001568, p < 10−19) and cell adhesion (GO:0007155, p < 10−10) for ECs, extracellular matrix organization (GO:0030198, p < 10−11) and muscle organ development (GO:0007517; p < 10−8) for VSMCs, and cell projection organization (GO:0030030; p < 10−9), cell adhesion (GO:0007155, p < 10−13) and the cell cycle process (GO:0007049; p < 10−6) for hPSCs (Figure 3B).
Figure 3
Global transcriptome and metabolomic analyses confirm vascular cell identity of differentiated hPSCs
(A) Global heat map of 2955 differentially expressed genes between embryonic stem cells (ESC) and differentiated endothelial cells (EC), vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), and primary cells (>10 fold change for at least one cell type). HUVEC= human umbilical vein EC, HSVEC= human saphenous vein EC, HAEC= human aortic EC, HPVSMC= human pulmonary VSMC, HAVSMC= human aortic VSMC. Columns represent genes, and rows are samples. Column Z-score transformation was performed on log2 expression values for each gene with blue denoting a lower and red a higher expression level according to the average expression level. Hierarchical clustering of genes and samples is based on average linkage and correlation distance. (B) Heat map of marker genes panels for pluripotency, smooth muscle and endothelial cells across the same samples as in (A). Columns represent genes, and rows are samples. Column Z-score transformation was performed on log2 values for each gene with blue denoting a lower and red a higher expression level according to the average expression level. Hierarchical clustering of genes and samples is based on average linkage and correlation distance. (C) Heatmap of the metabolite composition of the different cell types clustered by similarities for the 66 metabolites detected intracellularly (see Supplemental Figure 5 for list of metabolites). Columns represent metabolites and rows represent samples. A dendogram beside the left y-axis illustrates clustering by similarity of metabolite value. There were n=3 cell line biological replicates for each cell type. Metabolite data was acquired as a single acquisition on mass spectrometer. Raw metabolite levels were log2 transformed to approximate a normal distribution. Red = higher values, blue = lower values. PSC= pluripotent stem cell, (c)= contractile and (s)= synthetic, UASMC= umbilical artery smooth muscle cell, HCAEC= human coronary artery EC. (D) Correlation matrix of spearman correlation coefficients of metabolite levels for each cell type. Color code represents strength of correlation: red = strongest correlation, blue = weakest. Spearman rank correlation performed on the non-parametric raw metabolite values and expressed as a correlation matrix (see Supplemental Figure 5 for list of metabolites). n=3 cell line biological replicates for each cell type. Metabolite data was acquired as a single acquisition on mass spectrometer. PSC = pluripotent parental stem cell, (c)= contractile and (s)= synthetic.
We performed gene set enrichment analysis to find genes defined by biological processes within those genes that were either up- or down-regulated Only gene-sets passing significance thresholds with a p-value of 0.001 and a false discovery rate of 0.05 were selected as biological processes significantly over- or under-represented in hPSC-derived ECs, VSMCs, and primary cells versus hPSCs. Positively enriched gene sets for hPSC-derived and primary ECs included endothelial cell differentiation (GO:0045446), angiogenesis (GO:0001525), endothelium development (GO:0003158) and blood vessel development (GO:0001568). For all VSMCs, top enriched gene sets were extracellular matrix (GO:0030198), collagen fibril organization (GO:0030199), regulation of smooth muscle cell migration (GO:0014911) and proliferation (GO:0048660). Most significantly down-regulated gene-sets in hPSC- derived ECs and VSCMs were gene sets for mitosis (GO:0007067) and chromosome segregation (GO:0007059) (Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Figure 3C).In summary, transcriptome-wide expression analysis demonstrated that hPSC-derived ECs and VSMCs were highly similar to their respective primary cells.
hPSC-derived ECs and VSMCs diplay a metabolomic profile similar to primary vascular cells
We performed metabolomic analysis via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) of hPSC-derived vascular and primary cells. Of 106 metabolites, we detected 66 intracellularly (Supplementary Table 5). There was a strong correlation between metabolite levels in primary ECs and in hPSC-derived ECs (Spearman coefficient HUVEC v hPSC-EC = 0.96, HCAEC v hPSC-EC = 0.98, Figure 3C and D), and also between metabolite concentrations in primary VSMCs (UASMCs) and in hPSC-VSMCs (Spearman coefficient = 0.92, Figure 3C and D). These similarities were seen across metabolite classes, including amino acids, amino acid derivatives, nucleosides, organic nitrogenous compounds, aromatic acids, amine oxides, and other organic acids (Supplementary Table 5). In contrast, hPSCs had a distinct metabolic profile when compared to hPSC-ECs (Spearman coefficient = 0.80) or hPSC-VSMCs (Spearman coefficient AUSMC (contractile) v hPSC-VSMC (contractile) = 0.97, AUSMC (synthetic) v hPSC-VSMC (synthetic) = 0.97, Figure 3C and D). Thus, these analyses indicate that hPSC-derived vascular cells have metabolic profiles that closely resemble primary ECs and VSMCs.
hPSC-derived ECs and VSMCs exhibit mature functional properties
We sought to analyze the functional capabilities of hPSC-derived vascular cells. To determine barrier function of hPSC-ECs we measured impedance using an xCeLLigence RT-CA system [42,43]. The formation of a tight monolayer was observed by an increase in impedance within four hours after plating. Monolayer impedance reached a plateau, which was maintained for several days without major fluctuations (Figure 4A). Treatment with the vasoactive agent thrombin led to a rapid and reversible decrease in impedance [44]. Analysis of trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) revealed that hPSC-ECs showed TEER values similar to primary ECs (HUVECs). Treatment with cytokines TNF-α, VEGF-A, and IL1ß led to disruption of barrier tightness as revealed by decrease in TEER values (Figure 4B). We then analyzed further in vitro functional features of hPSC-ECs. The capacity of lipid uptake was monitored using fluorescently labeled acetylated LDL (Figure 4C).
Figure 4
In vitro characterization of hPSC-ECs and hPSC-VSMCs
(A) Impedance-based monitoring of hPSC-EC monolayer culture. Thrombin treatment (blue, see inset) induced rapid decrease in impedance compared to control (red). One of the 4 independent experiments is depicted (n=8 technical replicates/experiment). Points represent mean +/− SD. (B) Trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) properties of human umbilical cord endothelial cells (HUVECs) and hPSC-ECs either untreated or treated with 100ng/ml TNF-α; 100ng/ml VEGFA or 100ng/ml IL1; n=3 wells of 3 independent experiments (n= 9 wells in total except for untreated hPSC-ECs n=7 in total). Columns show mean +/− SEM. Student t-test ** p=5.56×10−6; * p=1.61×10−5. (C) Uptake of fluorescently labeled acLDL by hPSC-ECs. Scale bars: 50μM. Representative image of 3 independent experiments. (D, E) Expression analyses of adhesion molecule ICAM1 upon treatment of hPSC-ECs with proinflammatory cytokines. Representative images and FACS plot from 3 independent experiments (3 technical replicates/experiment). (D) Immunofluorescence staining reveals upregulation of ICAM1 by TNFα treatment. Scale bars: 50μM. (E) Quantification of ICAM1 expression upon TNFα or IL1ß stimulation. (F) Immunostaining (left) and quantification of adhesion of leukocyte-like HL60 cells to hPSC-ECs upon TNFα stimulation. Scale bars: 50μM. Columns show mean +/− SD of 3 independent experiments. (G) Dose-dependent blockage of HL60 cell adhesion by anti-ICAM1 antibody pretreatment. Columns show mean +/− SD of 3 independent experiments (except for treatment with control antibody concentrations 0.1, 1. 3, here n=1) (H) Calcium imaging of SC-VSMCs at day 13 of differentiation. Stimulation with vasoconstrictive reagents resulted in increase in intracellular calcium. Fold change RFU to t=1 (before treatment) at t=50s (maximum peak). Columns show mean +/− SD of 3 independent assays and data were evaluated using Student’s t-test; * = p=0.03 (I) Contractility assay on UASMCs and hPSC-VSMCs with U46619 48 hours after treatment. This graph shows one single experiment where control = 1 well and test = 2 wells per conditions.
To determine whether hPSC-ECs respond to proinflammatory cytokines with a pro-adhesive phenotype, we challenged the hPSC-ECs with TNF-α and IL-1ß. Immunofluorescence analysis showed an increased expression of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1) upon TNF-α treatment (Figure 4D). Flow cytometric analysis results confirmed the upregulation of ICAM1 upon TNF-α and IL-1ß stimulation (Figure 4E). We co-cultured hPSC-ECs with leukocyte-like HL60 cells to examine cellular adhesion molecule-mediated tethering and capture[45, 46]. Remarkably, adhesion of HL60 cells was significantly enhanced when hPSC-derived ECs were stimulated with TNF-α (Figure 4F). Application of ICAM1-specific antibodies reduced adhesion of HL60 cells in a concentration-dependent manner suggesting that leukocyte adhesion was indeed mediated by ICAM1 (Figure 4G).Next, we analyzed contractility of hPSC-VSMCs by stimulation with vasoconstrictive drugs or cytokines (Figure 4H and Supplementary Figure 4A). Calcium imaging revealed that Endothelin1 and carbachol induced an increase in intracellular calcium levels. Treatment with atropin prevented carbachol mediated calcium influx. Utilizing a 3-dimensional collagen contractility assay, hPSC-VSMCs contracted similarly to primary VSMCs when exposed to a vasoconstrictor (U46619; Figure 4I and Supplementary Figure 4B). Thus, hPSC-derived VSMCs are capable of responding to vasoconstrictive stimuli displaying a key functional in vivo characteristic.Deposition of extracellular fibronectin (FN) was analysed following treatment of hPSC-VSMCs with increasing concentrations of TGF-ß (Supplementary Figure 4C). Interestingly, FN depositions could be detected even in untreated cultures. As VSMCs produce TGF-ß this is likely due to autocrine TGF-ß signaling [47]. Treatment with exogenous TGF-ß led to a slight increase in FN production. Addition of small molecules inhibiting TGF-ß signaling (SB525334 or JQ1) prevented FN production in the presence and absence of exogenous TGF-ß. Thus, FN deposition of hPSC-VSMCs is mediated by TGF-ß.In summary, these findings show that hPSC-derived ECs and VSMCs demonstrate key mature functional properties.
hPSC-ECs form vascular structures in vitro and in vivo after transplantation
Tube formation assays were performed to determine the angiogenic potential of hPSC-ECs. Formation of vascular network-like structures was observed within 24hours and could be perturbed by treatment with sulforaphane and an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (Figure 5A and B). Remarkably, when hPSC-ECs were co-cultured with primary human brain vascular pericytes (hBVPs) both cell types arranged in highly organized structures with hBVPs tightly associated to endothelial tubes (Figure 5C). HBVPs cells appeared to envelope hPSC-EC tubes (Figure 5D). These results demonstrate that hPSC-ECs have angiogenic potential in vitro. To evaluate this potential in vivo, we utilized fibrinogen grafts in immunodeficient NOD-SCIDmice[48]. We implanted either hPSC-ECs alone, HUVECs and MSCs, hPSC-ECs and MSCs, or hPSC-ECs and hPSC-VSMCs into dorsal side of NOD-SCID mice and recovered the grafts for analysis after 14 days (except for hPSC-ECs alone = 7 days) (Supplementary Figure 5)[48]. Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed vessel-like networks in implants containing HUVECs and MSCs, hPSC-ECs and MSCs, and hPSC-ECs and hPSC-VSMCs (Figure 5G, I, and K). Of note, vessels contained numerous circulating red blood cells. Staining with an antibody for humanCD31 revealed vessel-like structures throughout the implants (Figure 5H, J and L). Thus, hPSC-ECs are capable of contributing to patent, blood containing vessel-like networks in vivo.
Figure 5
Co-culture experiments and in vivo characterization of hPSC-ECs
(A) In vitro tube formation assay of hPSC-ECs plated on matrigel for 24 hours, representative picture from 10 independent experiments. Scale bar: 50μm. (B) Quantification of the inhibitory effect of anti-angiogenic molecules on the tubologenesis of hPSC-ECs. Columns show means +/− SD of 3 independent experiments, (1ug/ml anti-VEGF, here n=1, no error bar) (C) Tube formation of hPSC-ECs with primary human brain vascular pericytes (hBVPs) (red) on matrigel after 24 hours. Scale bar: 50μm. (D) Close-up view in insert shows tubular structures formed by hPSC-ECs with closely associated hBVPs (arrows), representative picture from 3 independent experiments. Scale bar: 50μm. (E-L) Representative pictures of fibrinogen grafts 14 days after implantation (except E and F, 7 days post implantation), (E,G,I,K) HE staining (F,H,J,L) human specific CD31/DAB staining. (E,F) hPSC-ECs only (G,H) HUVECs + MSCs (I,J) hPSC-ECs + MSCs and (K, L) hPSC-ECs+hPSC-VSMCs. This experiment was conducted once with 5 mice per conditions and 2 implants per mice (=10 implants per conditions). Scale bar: 50μm.
Discussion
We report the rapid and efficient differentiation of hPSCs to ECs and VSMCs. GSK3β inhibition combined with BMP4 treatment enabled the commitment of hPSCs to mesoderm. Subsequently, differentiation was directed by treatment with VEGF for ECs or PDGF-BB and ActivinA for VSMCs. This in vitro differentiation pathway showed similarities to vascular development in vivo. For instance, Wnt signaling is required to induce primitive streak formation [20], which then becomes committed lateral plate mesoderm via BMP4 signaling these events were also observed during our in vitro differentiation protocol. Genome-wide expression analysis revealed transiently expressed gene clusters linked to mesoderm formation and further regionalization into lateral plate mesoderm. Subsequently, EC and VSMC formation was indicated by increased expression of genes associated with vasculogenesis. Importantly, our protocol produced ECs and VSMCs that closely resembled their primary counterparts. Comprehensive functional characterization of hPSC-derived vascular cells indicated a bona fide vascular phenotype. Taken together, these experiments confirm the identity and maturity of the hPSC-derived ECs and VSMCs and suggest that the cells could be used to faithfully model human disease.Compared to other protocols that induce vascular cells from hPSCs, our approach provides several advantages. First, it occurs under chemically defined conditions in monolayer culture with low variability. While a recently published report utilizes chemically defined conditions and starts with a monolayer culture, they observed considerable variation between experiments and starting cell lines and only achieved efficiencies of 10–30%[18]. Second, our protocol allows the formation of ECs and VSMCs in a process closely resembling in vivo development. Last, our method allows rapid vascular differentiation with high efficiency. We obtained from 1 million hPSCs approximately 25–30 million ECs or VSMCs within 6 days, cutting the time to generate these cells in half as compared to published protocols[18]. As hPSC-derived ECs and VSMCs can be purified to near homogeneity by immunomagnetic cell sorting, the protocol is not only efficient but scalable. The method therefore represents a valuable tool for application of stem cells in assays such as disease modeling or high-throughput screening where the availability of large numbers of defined cell types is a key prerequisite. This approach is likely to serve as a new standard for deriving endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells at scales relevant for drug discovery and regenerative therapies.
Authors: Shulamit Levenberg; Justin S Golub; Michal Amit; Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor; Robert Langer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-03-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mun Chun Chan; Aaron C Hilyard; Connie Wu; Brandi N Davis; Nicholas S Hill; Ashish Lal; Judy Lieberman; Giorgio Lagna; Akiko Hata Journal: EMBO J Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Shijun Hu; Ming-Tao Zhao; Fereshteh Jahanbani; Ning-Yi Shao; Won Hee Lee; Haodong Chen; Michael P Snyder; Joseph C Wu Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-06-02
Authors: Xiao Han; Mengning Wang; Songwei Duan; Paul J Franco; Jennifer Hyoje-Ryu Kenty; Preston Hedrick; Yulei Xia; Alana Allen; Leonardo M R Ferreira; Jack L Strominger; Douglas A Melton; Torsten B Meissner; Chad A Cowan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ivan Carcamo-Orive; Ngan F Huang; Thomas Quertermous; Joshua W Knowles Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Johannes Bargehr; Lucinda Low; Christine Cheung; William G Bernard; Dharini Iyer; Martin R Bennett; Laure Gambardella; Sanjay Sinha Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 6.940