Literature DB >> 31406963

Racial Differences in Accepting Pegfilgrastim Onpro Kit (On-Body Injector) Use Among Cancer Patients.

M W Saif1, D W Hackenyos2, M H Smith2, P Healey2, V Relias2, K Wasif3.   

Abstract

Background: 1.1.Neulasta Onpro kit eliminates need for additional clinic visit after chemotherapy. Given the racially diverse population in our institution, we investigated acceptance of Onpro kit among patients on chemotherapy. Research Design and
Methods: 1.2.Single-institution, retrospective review conducted in patients with GI tumors who received Onpro kit within 1 hour of completion of systemic chemotherapy from Jan 2014 through Jan 2018. Clinic/nursing notes and pharmacy records were reviewed to identify patients who refused Onpro kit and to discern reasons for refusal, including racial reason.
Results: 1.3.Total 238 orders for kit were voided amongst 68 patients (Caucasian 41; African American 7; Spanish 3; Asian 17). Overall, 15/68 patients refused kit (22%) of these 87% were Asian. The reasons for refusal included dislike of bulky attachment to skin, request to place kit on stomach instead of arm, trepidation over unwitnessed administration of drug, fear of reaction, disposal at home, fear of pain, lack of confirmation of proper dose administration, and need for MRI. Conclusions: 1.4.While Onpro kit is an attractive alternative, 22% of patients with voided orders, mainly of Asian race, declined its application. We believe the current study represents the first look at important racial differences in accepting Onpro kit. Consideration of patients' cultural heritage, race, ethnicity and education may facilitate communication between physicians and patients to achieve optimal cancer care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Fever; Leukopenia; Neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim; Side effects

Year:  2019        PMID: 31406963      PMCID: PMC6690622     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (Las Vegas)        ISSN: 2640-1037


  11 in total

Review 1.  Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.

Authors:  A Bowling; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

2.  Severe myelosuppression resulting from concurrent administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  N J Meropol; L L Miller; E L Korn; L E Braitman; M L MacDermott; L M Schuchter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-08-05       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Time trends in late-stage diagnosis of cervical cancer. Differences by race/ethnicity and income.

Authors:  J B Mitchell; L A McCormack
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety of pegfilgrastim administered by two delivery methods: on-body injector and manual injection with a prefilled syringe.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Phuong Khanh Morrow; Xikun Wu; Michael Moxness; Desmond Padhi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Kari Bohlke; Gary H Lyman; Kenneth R Carson; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; John M Goldberg; James L Khatcheressian; Natasha B Leighl; Cheryl L Perkins; George Somlo; James L Wade; Antoinette J Wozniak; James O Armitage
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Ethnic variation in knee replacement: patient preferences or uninformed disparity?

Authors:  Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Julianne Souchek; P Adam Kelly; Kimberly O'Malley; Margaret Byrne; Marsha Richardson; Chong Pak
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-05-23

8.  The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Jenny M Whitworth; Kellie S Matthews; Kimberly A Shipman; T Michael Numnum; James E Kendrick; Larry C Kilgore; J Michael Straughn
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: evidence based review.

Authors:  Nila Bhana
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.645

10.  Trajectory of absolute neutrophil counts in patients treated with pegfilgrastim on the day of chemotherapy versus the day after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yanli Li; Zandra Klippel; Xiaolong Shih; Hong Wang; Maureen Reiner; John H Page
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  3 in total

1.  First Analysis of Same-day Pegfilgrastim Use with Concurrent Capecitabine-based Regimens in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies.

Authors:  Muhammad Wasif Saif; Nausheen Hakim; Jeffrey Chi; Hasan Rehman; Shreya Prasad Goyal; Coral Olazagasti; Patnita Forde Sheperd; Jyothi Jose
Journal:  Cancer Med J       Date:  2020-12-30

2.  Initial testing of pegfilgrastim (Neulasta Onpro) on-body injector in multiple radiological imaging environments.

Authors:  Zaiyang Long; Anil Nicholas Kurup; Nicole M Jensen; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Beth A Schueler; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; Christopher P Wood; Joel P Felmlee
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  Pegfilgrastim Biosimilars in US Supportive Oncology: A Narrative Review of Administration Options and Economic Considerations to Maximize Patient Benefit.

Authors:  Sophia Z Humphreys; Robert B Geller; Paul Walden
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2022-09-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.