BACKGROUND: Pegfilgrastim is administered 24 hours. after chemotherapy to reduce risks of myelosuppression. This requires an additional clinic visit, which can be difficult for some patients (pts) due to work and transportation issues. In GI malignancies, patients receiving capecitabine-based regimens also require pegfilgrastim to reduce myelotoxicity. We present here the first study to analyze safety and efficacy of administering pegfilgrastim on the same day as capecitabine-based regimens in patients with GI malignancies. METHODS: We evaluated 157 patients with GI malignancies who received a capecitabine-based chemotherapy regimen, including XELOX, EOX, ECX, XELIRI, MIXE, gemcitabine-capecitabine and same-day pegfilgrastim (6 mg) within 1 hr of completion of systemic agents. As per institutional guidelines, patients were counseled on risks of same-day pegfilgrastim prior to its administration. Patients were followed to determine the degree of neutropenia and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 914 chemotherapy cycles in 157 patients were analyzed. Median ANC nadir for all cycles was 5634/uL (range: 450 - 23800). Grade 1 and 2 neutropenia developed in 11 of 914 cycles. Bone pain reported in 9 pts. There was 1 episode of grade >3 neutropenia resulting in infection and antibiotic use. No other patient required dose reductions, chemotherapy delays, or hospitalizations. No increased toxicity of capecitabine was noticed. CONCLUSIONS: We believe our study is the first in GI malignancies to report that same-day pegfilgrastim administration with capecitabine-based regimens may be as effective and safe as next-day administration. Additionally, given the absence of CD in human bone marrow, it appears capecitabine can be used concurrently with pegfilgrastim. Prospective studies should be done to further investigate, as this practice can benefit patients clinically, decrease office visits, increase patient's satisfaction and reduce healthcare costs.
BACKGROUND: Pegfilgrastim is administered 24 hours. after chemotherapy to reduce risks of myelosuppression. This requires an additional clinic visit, which can be difficult for some patients (pts) due to work and transportation issues. In GI malignancies, patients receiving capecitabine-based regimens also require pegfilgrastim to reduce myelotoxicity. We present here the first study to analyze safety and efficacy of administering pegfilgrastim on the same day as capecitabine-based regimens in patients with GI malignancies. METHODS: We evaluated 157 patients with GI malignancies who received a capecitabine-based chemotherapy regimen, including XELOX, EOX, ECX, XELIRI, MIXE, gemcitabine-capecitabine and same-day pegfilgrastim (6 mg) within 1 hr of completion of systemic agents. As per institutional guidelines, patients were counseled on risks of same-day pegfilgrastim prior to its administration. Patients were followed to determine the degree of neutropenia and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 914 chemotherapy cycles in 157 patients were analyzed. Median ANC nadir for all cycles was 5634/uL (range: 450 - 23800). Grade 1 and 2 neutropenia developed in 11 of 914 cycles. Bone pain reported in 9 pts. There was 1 episode of grade >3 neutropenia resulting in infection and antibiotic use. No other patient required dose reductions, chemotherapy delays, or hospitalizations. No increased toxicity of capecitabine was noticed. CONCLUSIONS: We believe our study is the first in GI malignancies to report that same-day pegfilgrastim administration with capecitabine-based regimens may be as effective and safe as next-day administration. Additionally, given the absence of CD in human bone marrow, it appears capecitabine can be used concurrently with pegfilgrastim. Prospective studies should be done to further investigate, as this practice can benefit patients clinically, decrease office visits, increase patient's satisfaction and reduce healthcare costs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Capecitabine; Chemotherapy; Fever; Leukopenia; Neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim; Side effects
Authors: J Schüller; J Cassidy; E Dumont; B Roos; S Durston; L Banken; M Utoh; K Mori; E Weidekamm; B Reigner Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2000 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: M Wasif Saif; Mohammaed A Eloubeidi; Suzanne Russo; Adam Steg; Jennifer Thornton; John Fiveash; Mark Carpenter; Carmello Blanquicett; Robert B Diasio; Martin R Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Howard A Burris; Chandra P Belani; Peter A Kaufman; Alan N Gordon; Lee S Schwartzberg; Warren S Paroly; Seta Shahin; Lyndah Dreiling; Alan Saven Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: David Cunningham; Naureen Starling; Sheela Rao; Timothy Iveson; Marianne Nicolson; Fareeda Coxon; Gary Middleton; Francis Daniel; Jacqueline Oates; Andrew Richard Norman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew J Abrams; Kathryn E Huber; Jonathan P S Knisely; Bryan W Chang; Suzanne M Russo; Muhammad Wasif Saif Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: M W Saif; Shahrukh Hashmi; Daniel Zelterman; Khaldoun Almhanna; Richard Kim Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 2.571