Literature DB >> 31404807

Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing.

Brian B Monson1, Jenna Rock2, Anneliese Schulz2, Elissa Hoffman2, Emily Buss3.   

Abstract

A fundamental principle of neuroscience is that each species' and individual's sensory systems are tailored to meet the demands placed upon them by their environments and experiences. What has driven the upper limit of the human frequency range of hearing? The traditional view is that sensitivity to the highest frequencies (i.e., beyond 8 kHz) facilitates localization of sounds in the environment. However, this has yet to be demonstrated for naturally occurring non-speech sounds. An alternative view is that, for social species such as humans, the biological relevance of conspecific vocalizations has driven the development and retention of auditory system features. Here, we provide evidence for the latter theory. We evaluated the contribution of extended high-frequency (EHF) hearing to common ecological speech perception tasks. We found that restricting access to EHFs reduced listeners' discrimination of talker head orientation by approximately 34%. Furthermore, access to EHFs significantly improved speech recognition under listening conditions in which the target talker's head was facing the listener while co-located background talkers faced away from the listener. Our findings raise the possibility that sensitivity to the highest audio frequencies fosters communication and socialization of the human species. These findings suggest that loss of sensitivity to the highest frequencies may lead to deficits in speech perception. Such EHF hearing loss typically goes undiagnosed, but is widespread among the middle-aged population.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cocktail party problem; High frequency hearing; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31404807      PMCID: PMC6860371          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  40 in total

1.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; K A Williams; F Lacerda; K N Stevens; B Lindblom
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Sound localization.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2015

Review 3.  Neural processing of natural sounds.

Authors:  Frédéric E Theunissen; Julie E Elie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Comparative Auditory Neuroscience: Understanding the Evolution and Function of Ears.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-18

5.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The localisation of spectrally restricted sounds by human listeners.

Authors:  S Carlile; S Delaney; A Corderoy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Sound texture perception via statistics of the auditory periphery: evidence from sound synthesis.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Primate hearing from a mammalian perspective.

Authors:  Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2004-11

9.  Short-term word-learning rate in children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss in limited and extended high-frequency bandwidths.

Authors:  Andrea L Pittman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Dawna E Lewis; Sangsook Choi; Brenda Hoover
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  14 in total

1.  Clinical Considerations for Routine Auditory and Vestibular Monitoring in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Gayla L Poling; Ronald C Rubenstein; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Timothy E Hullar; David M Baguley; Holly L Burrows; Jennifer A Chisholm; Amy Custer; Laura Dreisbach Hawe; Lisa L Hunter; Theodore K Marras; Candice E Ortiz; Lucretia Petersen; Peter S Steyger; Kevin Winthrop; Erika M Zettner; Khaya Clark; Michelle Hungerford; Jay J Vachhani; Carmen C Brewer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  On the use of the TIMIT, QuickSIN, NU-6, and other widely used bandlimited speech materials for speech perception experiments.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Understanding Self-reported Hearing Disability in Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Sara E Harris; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Audiovisual Speech Processing in Relationship to Phonological and Vocabulary Skills in First Graders.

Authors:  Liesbeth Gijbels; Jason D Yeatman; Kaylah Lalonde; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Brendan P O'Connell; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Joseph Hopfinger
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  Functional Impacts of Aminoglycoside Treatment on Speech Perception and Extended High-Frequency Hearing Loss in a Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Cohort.

Authors:  Chelsea M Blankenship; Lisa L Hunter; M Patrick Feeney; Madison Cox; Lindsey Bittinger; Angela C Garinis; Li Lin; Gary McPhail; John P Clancy
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Extended High Frequencies Provide Both Spectral and Temporal Information to Improve Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Allison Trine; Brian B Monson
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.

Authors:  Meredith D Braza; Nicole E Corbin; Emily Buss; Brian B Monson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Brian B Monson; David R Moore; Sumitrajit Dhar; Beverly A Wright; Kevin J Munro; Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Chelsea M Blankenship; Samantha M Stiepan; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Separating the Causes of Listening Difficulties in Children.

Authors:  Harvey Dillon; Sharon Cameron
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.