Literature DB >> 34759207

Understanding Self-reported Hearing Disability in Adults With Normal Hearing.

Aryn M Kamerer1, Sara E Harris, Judy G Kopun, Stephen T Neely, Daniel M Rasetshwane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite a diagnosis of normal hearing, many people experience hearing disability (HD) in their everyday lives. This study assessed the ability of a number of demographic and auditory variables to explain and predict self-reported HD in people regarded as audiologically healthy via audiometric thresholds.
DESIGN: One-hundred eleven adults (ages 19 to 74) with clinically normal hearing (i.e., audiometric thresholds ≤25 dB HL at all octave and interoctave frequencies between 0.25 and 8 kHz and bilaterally symmetric hearing) were asked to complete the 12-item version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12) as a measure of self-reported HD. Patient history and a number of standard and expanded measures of hearing were assessed in a multivariate regression analysis to predict SSQ12 score. Patient history included age, sex, history of noise exposure, and tinnitus. Hearing-related measures included audiometry at standard and extended high frequencies, word recognition, otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem response, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and FM detection threshold.
RESULTS: History of impulse noise exposure, speech-intelligibility index, and FM detection threshold accurately predicted SSQ12 and were able to account for 40% of the SSQ12 score. These three measures were also able to predict whether participants self-reported HD with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 86%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although participant audiometric thresholds were within normal limits, higher thresholds, history of impulse noise exposure, and FM detection predicted self-reported HD.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34759207      PMCID: PMC9010339          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.562


  86 in total

1.  THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD REFERENCE ZERO FOR PURE-TONE AUDIOMETERS AND ITS RELATION TO THE EVALUATION ON IMPAIRMENT OF HEARING.

Authors:  H DAVIS; F W KRANZ
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1964-03

2.  Hearing loss from industrial noise, head injury and ear disease. A multivariate analysis on audiometric examinations of 110,647 workers.

Authors:  M Neuberger; K Körpert; A Raber; F Schwetz; P Bauer
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1992

3.  Dynamics of cochlear synaptopathy after acoustic overexposure.

Authors:  Leslie D Liberman; Jun Suzuki; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-13

4.  Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; A Masuda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap.

Authors:  William Noble; Stuart Gatehouse
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal discrimination.

Authors:  James M Broadway; Randall W Engle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Peter T Johannesen; Patricia Pérez-González; José L Blanco; Sridhar Kalluri; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  An Approach to Self-Assessed Auditory Wellness in Older Adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Peter T Johannesen; Patricia Pérez-González; Sridhar Kalluri; José L Blanco; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hearing thresholds elevation and potential association with emotional problems among 1,914 children in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Huidi Xiao; Nubiya Amaerjiang; Weiwei Wang; Menglong Li; Jiawulan Zunong; Hui En; Xuelei Zhao; Cheng Wen; Yiding Yu; Lihui Huang; Yifei Hu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.