Literature DB >> 25726265

Sound localization.

John C Middlebrooks1.   

Abstract

The auditory system derives locations of sound sources from spatial cues provided by the interaction of sound with the head and external ears. Those cues are analyzed in specific brainstem pathways and then integrated as cortical representation of locations. The principal cues for horizontal localization are interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural differences in sound level (ILDs). Vertical and front/back localization rely on spectral-shape cues derived from direction-dependent filtering properties of the external ears. The likely first sites of analysis of these cues are the medial superior olive (MSO) for ITDs, lateral superior olive (LSO) for ILDs, and dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) for spectral-shape cues. Localization in distance is much less accurate than that in horizontal and vertical dimensions, and interpretation of the basic cues is influenced by additional factors, including acoustics of the surroundings and familiarity of source spectra and levels. Listeners are quite sensitive to sound motion, but it remains unclear whether that reflects specific motion detection mechanisms or simply detection of changes in static location. Intact auditory cortex is essential for normal sound localization. Cortical representation of sound locations is highly distributed, with no evidence for point-to-point topography. Spatial representation is strictly contralateral in laboratory animals that have been studied, whereas humans show a prominent right-hemisphere dominance.
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HRTF; Spatial hearing; auditory cortex; auditory motion; distance perception; interaural level difference; interaural time difference; precedence effect; superior colliculus; superior olivary complex

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25726265     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00006-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol        ISSN: 0072-9752


  15 in total

1.  Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum.

Authors:  Dante F Wasmuht; Jose L Pena; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Sound localization behavior in Drosophila melanogaster depends on inter-antenna vibration amplitude comparisons.

Authors:  Alexandra V Batchelor; Rachel I Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Purinergic Modulation of Activity in the Developing Auditory Pathway.

Authors:  Sasa Jovanovic; Ivan Milenkovic
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Robust Rate-Place Coding of Resolved Components in Harmonic and Inharmonic Complex Tones in Auditory Midbrain.

Authors:  Yaqing Su; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Jenna Rock; Anneliese Schulz; Elissa Hoffman; Emily Buss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Benefits of active listening during 3D sound localization.

Authors:  V Gaveau; A Coudert; R Salemme; E Koun; C Desoche; E Truy; A Farnè; F Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Amplification of input differences by dynamic heterogeneity in the spiral ganglion.

Authors:  Robert A Crozier; Zachary Q Wismer; Jeffrey Parra-Munevar; Mark R Plummer; Robin L Davis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.974

8.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Monaural Congenital Deafness Affects Aural Dominance and Degrades Binaural Processing.

Authors:  Jochen Tillein; Peter Hubka; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Processing of frequency and location in human subcortical auditory structures.

Authors:  Michelle Moerel; Federico De Martino; Kâmil Uğurbil; Essa Yacoub; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.