Literature DB >> 3139607

Comparative psychoacoustics.

R R Fay1.   

Abstract

Psychophysical data on unspecialized mammals commonly used in auditory research were compiled from the literature, and an attempt was made to compare the hearing capacities of these species with man. Binaural hearing and sound localization were not considered. The most complete psychoacoustic data exist for chinchilla, cat, various primates, and the mouse. The existing data include audiograms, frequency and intensity discrimination thresholds, critical masking ratios, critical bandwidths, temporal summation functions at threshold, psychophysical tuning curves, gap detection thresholds, temporal modulation transfer functions, temporal discriminations, and auditory filter shapes. In general, the qualitative forms of most all psychoacoustic functions for these mammals are similar to those for man, and there is little reason to believe that the mechanisms underlying these capacities are different across mammals. Although the discriminative capacities of humans are generally more acute than those of non-humans, the database on the capacities of non-humans is not yet sufficient for systematic comparisons across species to be made with confidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3139607     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90009-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  17 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Behaviorally gated reduction of spontaneous discharge can improve detection thresholds in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Bradley N Buran; Gardiner von Trapp; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Rodent auditory perception: Critical band limitations and plasticity.

Authors:  J King; M Insanally; M Jin; A R O Martins; J A D'amour; R C Froemke
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Margit E Dylla; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Jenna Rock; Anneliese Schulz; Elissa Hoffman; Emily Buss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Behavioral measures of auditory streaming in ferrets (Mustela putorius).

Authors:  Ling Ma; Christophe Micheyl; Pingbo Yin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Laser-induced collagen remodeling and deposition within the basilar membrane of the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Gentiana I Wenzel; Bahman Anvari; Amaan Mazhar; Brian Pikkula; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Electrophysiological properties of octopus neurons of the cat cochlear nucleus: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ramazan Bal; Giyasettin Baydas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-11

Review 9.  A historical to present-day account of efforts to answer the question: "what puts the brakes on mammalian hair cell regeneration?".

Authors:  Joseph C Burns; Jeffrey T Corwin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Evolution and development of the tetrapod auditory system: an organ of Corti-centric perspective.

Authors:  Bernd Fritzsch; Ning Pan; Israt Jahan; Jeremy S Duncan; Benjamin J Kopecky; Karen L Elliott; Jennifer Kersigo; Tian Yang
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.