| Literature DB >> 31395820 |
Martina Barchitta1, Andrea Maugeri1, Roberta Magnano San Lio1, Giuliana Favara1, Maria Clara La Rosa1, Claudia La Mastra1, Annalisa Quattrocchi1, Antonella Agodi2.
Abstract
Bioactive food compounds have different effects on global DNA methylation, an epigenetic mechanism associated with chromosomal stability and genome function. Since the diet is characterized by a mixture of foods, we aimed to identify dietary patterns in women, and to evaluate their association with long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE-1) methylation, a surrogate marker of global DNA methylation. We conducted an observational cross-sectional study of 349 women from Southern Italy, with no history of severe diseases. Dietary patterns were derived by food frequency questionnaire and principal component analysis. LINE-1 methylation of leukocyte DNA was assessed by pyrosequencing. We observed that intake of wholemeal bread, cereals, fish, fruit, raw and cooked vegetables, legumes, soup, potatoes, fries, rice, and pizza positively correlated with LINE-1 methylation levels. By contrast, vegetable oil negatively correlated with LINE-1 methylation levels. Next, we demonstrated that adherence to a prudent dietary pattern-characterized by high intake of potatoes, cooked and raw vegetables, legumes, soup and fish-was positively associated with LINE-1 methylation. In particular, women in the 3rd tertile exhibited higher LINE-1 methylation level than those in the 1st tertile (median = 66.7 %5mC; IQR = 4.67 %5mC vs. median = 63.1 %5mC; IQR = 12.3 %5mC; p < 0.001). Linear regression confirmed that women in the 3rd tertile had higher LINE-1 methylation than those in the 1st tertile (β = 0.022; SE = 0.003; p < 0.001), after adjusting for age, educational level, employment status, smoking status, use of folic acid supplement, total energy intake and body mass index. By contrast, no differences in LINE-1 methylation across tertiles of adherence to the Western dietary pattern were evident. Interestingly, women who exclusively adhered to the prudent dietary pattern had a higher average LINE-1 methylation level than those who exclusively or preferably adhered to the Western dietary pattern (β = 0.030; SE = 0.004; p < 0.001; β = 0.023; SE = 0.004; p < 0.001; respectively), or those with no preference for a specific dietary pattern (β = 0.013; SE = 0.004; p = 0.002). Our study suggested a remarkable link between diet and DNA methylation; however, further mechanistic studies should be encouraged to understand the causal relationship between dietary intake and DNA methylation.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; diet; epigenetics; food intake
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31395820 PMCID: PMC6722720 DOI: 10.3390/nu11081843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Bar graph of factor loadings characterizing dietary patterns.
Characteristics of study population by adherence to dietary patterns.
| Characteristics | Prudent | Western | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Tertile | 2nd Tertile | 3rd Tertile | 1st Tertile | 2nd Tertile | 3rd Tertile | |||
| Age, years | 32.0 (19.0) | 35.0 (19.0) | 46.0 (34.0) | <0.001 | 41.0 (34.0) | 40.0 (24.0) | 30.0 (17.0) | <0.001 |
| Educational level | ||||||||
| Low | 34.5% | 18.8% | 23.3% | 0.049 | 24.1% | 23.1% | 29.3% | 0.832 |
| Medium | 37.9% | 53.8% | 50.9% | 47.4% | 49.6% | 45.7% | ||
| High | 27.6% | 27.4% | 25.9% | 28.4% | 27.4% | 25.0% | ||
| Employment status (% unemployed) | 62.1% | 47.0% | 53.4% | 0.069 | 53.4% | 55.6% | 53.4% | 0.933 |
| Smoking status | ||||||||
| Never smokers | 67.8% | 69.2% | 62.6% | 0.757 | 63.5% | 65.5% | 70.7% | 0.011 |
| Former smokers | 11.3% | 13.7% | 14.8% | 14.8% | 19.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Current smokers | 20.9% | 17.1% | 22.6% | 21.7% | 14.7% | 24.1% | ||
| Use of folic acid supplement (% users) | 19.0% | 18.8% | 7.8% | 0.024 | 19.8% | 16.2% | 9.5% | 0.083 |
| Total energy intake, kcal | 1693.0 (3581.0) | 1940.0 (614.0) | 2142.0 (563.0) | <0.001 | 2028.0 (682.0) | 1781.0 (2610.0) | 2065.0 (744.0) | 0.001 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.3 (6.8) | 23.9 (5.8) | 24.1 (23.0) | 0.971 | 23.0 (4.8) | 25.0 (5.7) | 23.0 (8.1) | 0.067 |
| Body mass index categories | ||||||||
| Underweight | 3.5% | 6.9% | 5.2% | 0.403 | 3.5% | 2.6% | 9.6% | 0.002 |
| Normal weight | 60.9% | 50.9% | 53.0% | 65.2% | 47.9% | 51.8% | ||
| Overweight | 19.1% | 28.4% | 29.6% | 21.7% | 35.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Obese | 16.5% | 13.8% | 12.2% | 9.6% | 13.7% | 19.3% | ||
Results are reported as median (interquartile range), or percentage. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square test for bivariate or categorical variable, and Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables.
Figure 2Correlation matrix between food intake and log-transformed LINE-1 methylation level. Results are reported as Spearman’s correlation coefficient and those with Bonferroni-corrected p-value < 0.001 are indicated in bold font.
Figure 3Comparison of LINE-1 methylation level across tertiles of adherence to (a) the prudent and (b) Western dietary patterns. *** p < 0.001 based on the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Linear regression analysis of the association between adherence to the prudent dietary pattern and LINE-1 methylation level.
| Regression Model | LINE-1 Methylation | 1st Tertile | 2nd Tertile | 3rd Tertile | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (SE) | β (SE) | ||||||
| Model 1 | CpG site 1 |
| 0.001 (0.002) | 0.599 | 0.008 (0.002) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| CpG site 2 |
| 0.009 (0.010) | 0.348 | 0.011 (0.009) | 0.234 | 0.233 | |
| CpG site 3 |
| 0.011 (0.007) | 0.120 | 0.019 (0.006) | 0.003 | 0.003 | |
| Average |
| 0.006 (0.005) | 0.263 | 0.012 (0.005) | 0.017 | 0.017 | |
| Model 2 | CpG site 1 |
| 0.001 (0.002) | 0.990 | 0.009 (0.003) | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| CpG site 2 |
| 0.015 (0.004) | 0.001 | 0.030 (0.005) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| CpG site 3 |
| 0.016 (0.003) | <0.001 | 0.034 (0.003) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Average |
| 0.009 (0.002) | <0.001 | 0.022 (0.003) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Statistical analysis was performed using unadjusted linear regression (Model 1) and further adjusting for age, educational level, employment status, smoking status, use of folic acid supplement, total energy intake and BMI (Model 2).
Linear regression analysis of the association between adherence to the Western dietary pattern and LINE-1 methylation level.
| Regression Model | LINE-1 Methylation | 1st Tertile | 2nd Tertile | 3rd Tertile | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (SE) | β (SE) | ||||||
| Model 1 | CpG site 1 |
| 0.001 (0.002) | 0.828 | −0.003 (0.002) | 0.276 | 0.262 |
| CpG site 2 |
| −0.009 (0.008) | 0.310 | −0.002 (0.009) | 0.838 | 0.835 | |
| CpG site 3 |
| −0.008 (0.006) | 0.202 | −0.002 (0.007) | 0.753 | 0.743 | |
| Average |
| −0.005 (0.005) | 0.316 | −0.002 (0.005) | 0.702 | 0.690 | |
| Model 2 | CpG site 1 |
| 0.002 (0.002) | 0.523 | −0.001 (0.003) | 0.676 | 0.760 |
| CpG site 2 |
| 0.005 (0.005) | 0.282 | −0.003 (0.005) | 0.549 | 0.837 | |
| CpG site 3 |
| 0.007 (0.004) | 0.067 | −0.001 (0.004) | 0.834 | 0.705 | |
| Average |
| 0.004 (0.003) | 0.101 | −0.001 (0.003) | 0.647 | 0.986 | |
Statistical analysis was performed using unadjusted linear regression (Model 1) and further adjusting for age, educational level, employment status, smoking status, use of folic acid supplement, total energy intake and BMI (Model 2).
Figure 4Comparison of LINE-1 methylation level across categories of adherence to dietary patterns for CpG site 1 (a), CpG site 2 (b), CpG site 3 (c) and their average (d). ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001, based on the Kruskal–Wallis test.