| Literature DB >> 31387670 |
Irēna Meistere1, Juris Ķibilds1, Lāsma Eglīte1, Laura Alksne1, Jeļena Avsejenko1, Alla Cibrovska1, Svetlana Makarova1, Madara Streikiša1, Lelde Grantiņa-Ieviņa1, Aivars Bērziņš1.
Abstract
BackgroundCampylobacter is the main cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide. The main transmission route is through consumption of food contaminated with Campylobacter species or contact with infected animals. In Latvia, the prevalence of campylobacteriosis is reported to be low (4.6 cases per 100,000 population in 2016).AimTo determine prevalence, species spectrum and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of Campylobacter spp. in Latvia, using data from various livestock and human clinical samples.MethodsWe analysed data of Campylobacter microbiological monitoring and AMR (2008 and 2014-16) in Latvia. Data from broilers, poultry, pigs, calves and humans were used to determine prevalence of Campylobacter. Additionally, 45 different origin isolates (22 human) were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform; for each isolate core genome multilocus sequence typing was used and relevant antimicrobial resistance mechanisms were identified.ResultsOverall, Campylobacter prevalence in was 83.3% in pigs, 50.2% in broilers, 16.1% in calves and 5.3% in humans; C. jejuni was the predominant species in all sources except pigs where C. coli was main species. High level of resistance in Campylobacter were observed against fluoroquinolones, tetracycline and streptomycin, in most of sequenced isolates genetic determinants of relevant AMR profiles were identified.ConclusionsIn Latvia, prevalence of Campylobacter in livestock is high, especially in pigs and broilers; prevalence in poultry and humans were lower than in other European countries. AMR analysis reveals increase of streptomycin and tetracycline resistant broiler origin C. jejuni strains. WGS demonstrates a high compliance between resistance phenotype and genotype for quinolones and tetracyclines.Entities:
Keywords: C.coli; C.jejuni; Campylobacter; Latvia; antimicrobial resistance; food-borne infections; surveillance; typing; whole genome sequencing; zoonotic infections
Year: 2019 PMID: 31387670 PMCID: PMC6685098 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.31.1800357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Euro Surveill ISSN: 1025-496X
Campylobacter species prevalence in various sources, Latvia, 2008–2016 (n = 1,303)
| Source | Year | Total samples tested | Negative | Positive |
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | (%) | n | (%) |
| (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | |||
|
| 2008 | 271 | 151 | 55.7 | 120 | 44.3 | 109 | 90.8 | 11 | 11 9.2 | 0 | 0 0.0 |
|
| 2014 | 147 | 54 | 36.7 | 93 | 63.3 | 93 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 2016 | 90 | 48 | 53.33 | 42 | 46.7 | 42 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 2016 | 31 | 27 | 87.1 | 4 | 12.9 | 4 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 2015 | 180 | 151 | 83.9 | 29 | 16.1 | 24 | 82.8 | 5 | 17.2 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 2015 | 150 | 25 | 16.7 | 125 | 83.3 | 2 | 1.6 | 114a | 91.2 | 11a | 8.8 |
|
| 2015–16 | 434 | 415 | 95.6 | 23 | 5.3 | 22 | 95.7 | 1 | 4.3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a Samples contained Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lanienae.
Figure 1Prevalence of resistant isolates of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, isolated from broilers, poultry, calves, pigs and humans, Latvia, 2008–2016 (n = 317)
Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter species by origin
| Source and year of sampling | Species | Number of isolates tested | Number of isolates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERY | TET | CIP | NAL | STR | GEN | MDR | |||
| Broilers, 2008 |
| 57 | 0/57 | 8/57 | 57/57 | 57/57 | 8/57 | 10/57 | 7/57 |
|
| 8 | 0/8 | 1/8 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 2/8 | 1/8 | 1/8 | |
| Broilers, 2014 |
| 93 | 1/93 | 22/93 | 93/93 | 93/93 | 1/93 | 3/93 | 0/93 |
| Broilers, 2016 |
| 40 | 0/40 | 17/40 | 39/40 | 39/40 | 18/40 | 0/40 | 18/40 |
| Poultry, 2016 |
| 4 | 0/4 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 2/4 | 0/4 | 2/4 |
| Pigs, 2015 |
| 1 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 |
|
| 71 | 1/71 | 39/71 | 38/71 | 36/71 | 55/71 | 1/71 | 21/71 | |
| Calves, 2015 |
| 21 | 0/21 | 14/21 | 13/21 | 14/21 | 4/21 | 2/21 | 2/21 |
|
| 3 | 0/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 1/3 | 3/3 | |
| Humans, 2015 |
| 18 | 0/18 | 10/18 | 13/18 | 13/18 | 3/18 | 0/18 | 3/18 |
|
| 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 | |
C: Campylobacter; CIP: ciprofloxacin; ERY: erythromycin; GEN: gentamycin; MDR: multidrug-resistant; NAL: nalidixic acid; STR: streptomycin; TET: tetracycline.
Sequence diversity of human and livestock samples, by sequence clonal complex, multilocus sequence type and core genome multilocus sequence type, Latvia, 2008–2016 (n = 45)
| Clonal complex | Multi locus sequence type | Core genome multi locus sequence type | Origin (isolates with certain genotype) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 19 | 1542 | Human (1) |
| 1598 | Human (1) | ||
| 21 | 1544 | Calf (2) | |
| 1545 | Calf (2) | ||
| 50 | 587 | Human (1) | |
| 1541 | Human (1) | ||
| 1547 | Human (2) | ||
| 806 | 1595 | Calf (2) | |
| 1519 | 205 | Human (1) | |
| 206 | 572 | 435 | Human (1) |
| 1596 | Human (1) | ||
| 283 | 267 | 193 | Human (1) |
| 383 | 251 | Poultry (1) | |
| 353 | 5 | 1546 | Broiler (2), Pig (1) |
| 6461 | 338 | Human (3), Poultry (2) | |
| 443 | 51 | 1543 | Human (4), Pig (1) |
| 464 | 464 | 1592 | Human (1) |
| 48 | 918 | 1597 | Calf (1) |
| 49 | 49 | 1593 | Human (3) |
| 828 | 828 | 1563 | Pig (1) |
| 854 | 1539 | Pig (1) | |
| 8328 | 1591 | Human (1) | |
| ND | ND | 1528 | Human (1) |
| 1529 | Calf (2) | ||
| 1535 | Pig (1) | ||
| 1537 | Pig (1) | ||
| 1538 | Pig (1) | ||
| 1540 | Pig (1) |
ND: not determined.
Figure 2Minimum spanning tree of 45 Campylobacter isolates
Comparison of Campylobacter species resistance and corresponding mechanisms in whole genome sequence, Latvia, 2008–2016
| Antimicrobial drug | Drug class | Resistance mechanism, gene or mutation | Resistance principle | Isolates with resistant phenotype | Isolates with resistance mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nalidixic Acid | Quinolones |
| Antibiotic target alteration | 30 | 30 |
| Ciprofloxacin |
| Antibiotic target alteration | 30 | 30 | |
| Tetracycline | Tetracyclines |
| Antibiotic target protection | 27 | 27 |
| Streptomycin | Aminoglycosides |
| Antibiotic inactivation | 12 | 9 |
|
| Antibiotic inactivation | 12 | 3 | ||
| Gentamycin |
| Antibiotic inactivation | 2 | 0 | |
|
| Antibiotic inactivation | 2 | 0 | ||
| Erythromycin | Macrolides | 23S RNA mutations | Antibiotic target alteration | 1 | 0 |