Literature DB >> 31387670

Campylobacter species prevalence, characterisation of antimicrobial resistance and analysis of whole-genome sequence of isolates from livestock and humans, Latvia, 2008 to 2016.

Irēna Meistere1, Juris Ķibilds1, Lāsma Eglīte1, Laura Alksne1, Jeļena Avsejenko1, Alla Cibrovska1, Svetlana Makarova1, Madara Streikiša1, Lelde Grantiņa-Ieviņa1, Aivars Bērziņš1.   

Abstract

BackgroundCampylobacter is the main cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide. The main transmission route is through consumption of food contaminated with Campylobacter species or contact with infected animals. In Latvia, the prevalence of campylobacteriosis is reported to be low (4.6 cases per 100,000 population in 2016).AimTo determine prevalence, species spectrum and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of Campylobacter spp. in Latvia, using data from various livestock and human clinical samples.MethodsWe analysed data of Campylobacter microbiological monitoring and AMR (2008 and 2014-16) in Latvia. Data from broilers, poultry, pigs, calves and humans were used to determine prevalence of Campylobacter. Additionally, 45 different origin isolates (22 human) were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform; for each isolate core genome multilocus sequence typing was used and relevant antimicrobial resistance mechanisms were identified.ResultsOverall, Campylobacter prevalence in was 83.3% in pigs, 50.2% in broilers, 16.1% in calves and 5.3% in humans; C. jejuni was the predominant species in all sources except pigs where C. coli was main species. High level of resistance in Campylobacter were observed against fluoroquinolones, tetracycline and streptomycin, in most of sequenced isolates genetic determinants of relevant AMR profiles were identified.ConclusionsIn Latvia, prevalence of Campylobacter in livestock is high, especially in pigs and broilers; prevalence in poultry and humans were lower than in other European countries. AMR analysis reveals increase of streptomycin and tetracycline resistant broiler origin C. jejuni strains. WGS demonstrates a high compliance between resistance phenotype and genotype for quinolones and tetracyclines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C.coli; C.jejuni; Campylobacter; Latvia; antimicrobial resistance; food-borne infections; surveillance; typing; whole genome sequencing; zoonotic infections

Year:  2019        PMID: 31387670      PMCID: PMC6685098          DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.31.1800357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Euro Surveill        ISSN: 1025-496X


Introduction

The most common cause of bacterial gastroenteritis is campylobacteriosis, which is an infection caused by Campylobacter spp. bacteria. More than 200,000 cases were reported in 2016 in Europe [1]. Latvia has one of the lowest rates of campylobacteriosis in the European Union (EU) with 4.6 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, however, it is probable that the majority of infections are not reported. For comparison, the prevalence of Campylobacter in other Baltic countries is much higher, with 22.6 and 42.4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in Estonia and Lithuania, respectively [1]. The main reservoirs of Campylobacter spp. are birds, cattle and pigs as the bacteria are a part of their enteric microflora. The main source of human infection is contaminated fresh meat, particularly poultry (due to its high consumption) and milk products [2]. There is also evidence that infection can be acquired from contaminated water [3] or mud [4]. A previous study in Latvia focused on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler production (samples collected from chickens in slaughterhouses, hereafter called broilers) and retail level (poultry), with 92.5% and 56.3% prevalence in pooled intestine and carcasses samples, respectively [5]. Detailed research of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) showed that a high proportion of Campylobacter strains in broilers originating from Latvia were resistant to fluoroquinolones (100% to ciprofloxacin and 87.9% to nalidixic acid) and streptomycin (39.6%) [6]. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has been demonstrated as a suitable method for routine surveillance and outbreak investigation of various infectious diseases including campylobacteriosis [7-9] and could be a powerful and reliable tool in AMR monitoring and phenotype prediction [10,11]. The aim of this study was to analyse the prevalence, species spectrum and AMR of Campylobacter spp. in various livestock and in human clinical samples. WGS analysis was used to identify the mechanisms of AMR and to evaluate the genetic heterogeneity and potential transmission routes between sources.

Methods

Sample collection

Animal and food samples were collected and tested within the Latvian National Monitoring Programme for Campylobacter according to European Union (EU) Directive 2003/99/EC [12], EU AMR monitoring according to Implementing Decision 2013/652/EU [13] and the Latvian National Research programme. In 2008, sequential samples of broiler skin and caeca were collected. In 2014 and 2016, sequential caeca samples were collected from two main broiler factories in Latvia. Each caeca sample was pooled from 10 individual birds. The skin and caeca sample groups did not differ significantly (chi-squared test, p = 0.462) in 2008, resulting in one merged group. The poultry samples were acquired as a part of the regular monitoring programme from retail stores in 2016. Pig caeca samples were collected from 40 slaughterhouses covering all regions of Latvia during 2015, each sample was pooled from five individual animals. Faecal specimens from healthy calves were collected from individual animals aged less than 1 year from 19 dairy cattle farms covering all territory of Latvia in 2015. Routinely tested human stool samples from sporadic cases of gastroenteritis were analysed for gastrointestinal bacterial pathogens. The samples were received 2015–16 from two regional acute care hospitals, each covering a population of ca 50,000. The isolated Campylobacter spp. strains were further analysed according to the AMR monitoring programme.

Ethical statement

Ethical approval was not required as human samples were routinely collected and patients’ data remained anonymous. The planning conduct and reporting of study was in line with the Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013.

Isolation and detection of Campylobacter spp.

The animal/food and human stool samples were tested in separate laboratories. All animal and food samples were cultured according to ISO 10272 for the detection of thermophilic Campylobacter on mCCDA agar (Biolife, Milan, Italy) under microaerobic conditions at 41.5 °C for 44 hours. Human stool samples were cultured according to in-house method on mCCDA agar (Biolife) under microaerobic conditions at 41.5 °C for 44 hours. Suspicious colonies were cultivated on Columbia blood agar and analysed after 24–44 hours. Identification of cultures was based on colony morphology, microscopic appearance (e.g. motility) and phenotypic characteristics, including the production of catalase and oxidase, hydrolysis of hippurate and indoxylacetate, followed by multiplex PCR [14] or mass spectrometry (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight, Bruker Daltonics Biotyper). Campylobacter isolates were stored in Brain heart infusion broth (Biolife) with 20% glycerol at - 80 °C until further investigation.

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing

C. jejuni and C. coli isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility by microdilution method in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 5% lysed horse blood (TREK Diagnostic Systems Ltd. East Grinstead, United Kingdom) and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) panel (Sensititre, reference EUCAMP2, TREK diagnostic Systems Ltd.). The susceptibility of Campylobacter isolates was determined following the standard M45-A2 for fastidious bacteria form the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [15]. According to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) were set: nalidixic acid 16 µg/mL, ciprofloxacin 0.5 µg/mL, gentamycin 2 µg/mL, streptomycin 4 µg/mL, erythromycin 4 µg/mL and 8 µg/mL, tetracycline 1 µg/mL and 2 µg/mL for C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively [16]. An isolate was defined as multidrug-resistant (MDR) when resistance to three or more nonrelated antimicrobials was observed.

Genomic DNA extraction and whole genome sequencing

A group of isolates was selected for WGS analysis including 23 human origin Campylobacter spp. (22 C. jejuni and one C. coli), supplemented by 22 isolates from other sources with the most relevant AMR profile [17]. Prior to genomic DNA extraction, the bacteria were cultured for 24h at 41.5 °C on Columbia broth agar with 5% lysed horse blood (TREK Diagnostic Systems Ltd.). Enzymatic lysis was used for DNA isolation and purification was done on silica-membrane, both according to QIAamp DNA Mini Kit protocol (QIAGEN Manchester Ltd. Manchester, United Kingdom). Sequencing libraries were constructed using 1 ng DNA with Nextera XT Library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, California (CA), United States (US)) and sequencing was performed on Illumina Miseq platform, generating 2x300-bp paired-end reads according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First, quality trimming for each sample was done until the average Phred quality was 30 in a window of 20 bp. Trimming was followed by de novo genome assembly using Velvet version 1.1.04 [18]. The expected genome size was 1.64 Mb. The quality of genome assembly was assessed by N50 (minimum 10,000 bp accepted) and the mean genome coverage (minimum 30x) that ranged from 39x to 117x, with 87x on average. All samples with quality parameters below these settings were re-sequenced.

Data analysis

Subsequently assembled genomes were analysed by the Ridom SeqSphere + 5.0.0 software (Ridom, Muenster, Germany) [19]. For genome characterisation gene by gene comparison of Campylobacter jejuni/coli multilocus sequence type (ST) seven loci and core genome (cg)MLST 637 loci were used. The newly identified alleles were submitted to the cgMLST nomenclature server (www.cgmlst.org) maintained by Ridom. The minimum spanning tree based on cgMLST 637 loci, pairwise ignoring missing values, was generated to evaluate the relationships between all Campylobacter spp. isolates and to identify potential outbreaks (cluster-alert distance of 13 cgMLST targets was set as the maximum absolute distance of different cgMLST targets used to indicate the epidemiological relationship between two samples (www.ridom.de). For selected isolates, kSNP3.0 software was used for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) identification and reference-free phylogeny analysis [20]. The genes and mutations encoding mechanisms of AMR were surveyed in assembled contigs with the Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) 4.0.1 and The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) 2.0.0 [21]. The applied cut-off values were 85% for sequence identity and 50% for sequence length (cut-offs were not applied in mutation screening). The presence of virulence factors was determined by screening assembled contigs against virulence factor database of virulence genes, version 18 March 2018 [22] with ABRicate (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate), using the default settings. For gene presence determination, the cut-off values were 85% for sequence identity and 50% for sequence length. For some genes, for example, flaA and flaB, the length cut-off was set at 20% due to these genes often being disrupted by gaps between contigs. The chi-squared test and Fischer’s exact test were used where applicable to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by using two-by-two frequency tables of the respective overlaps and considering p values of < 0.05 statistically significant.

Sequence data deposition

All raw reads generated were submitted to the European Nt Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/) under the study accession number PRJEB26725.

Results

Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in livestock and human samples

Between 2008 and 2016, the presence of Campylobacter spp. was tested in a total of 1,303 samples, with 434 (33.3%) found to be positive. The prevalence of Campylobacter spp. was significantly different across sources (Table 1; p values reported in Supplement S1).
Table 1

Campylobacter species prevalence in various sources, Latvia, 2008–2016 (n = 1,303)

SourceYearTotal samples testedNegativePositive Campylobacter jejuni Campylobacter coli Campylobacter lanienae
n(%)n (%) n (%)n (%)n (%)
Broilers 2008271151 55.7120 44.310990.81111 9.200 0.0
Broilers 20141475436.793 63.393100.000.000.0
Broilers 2016904853.3342 46.742100.000.000.0
Poultry 2016312787.14 12.94100.000.000.0
Calves 201518015183.92916.12482.8517.200.0
Pigs 20151502516.712583.321.6114a 91.211a 8.8
Humans 2015–1643441595.6235.32295.714.300.0
Total 1,303 869 66.7 434 33.3 292 67.3 131 30.3 11 2.5%

a Samples contained Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lanienae.

a Samples contained Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lanienae. For samples from broilers, 255 (50.6%) were positive for Campylobacter (Table 1). C. jejuni was the dominant bacterial population and was detected in 95.7% of all Campylobacter isolates while C. coli was found only in some samples in 2008. Poultry samples from retail stores had significantly lower prevalence when compared with broilers from slaughterhouses: 12.9% vs 3 years pooled prevalence 50.6% (OR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.05–0. 43; p 0.00005) (Supplement S1) and only C. jejuni was detected. The highest Campylobacter prevalence (83.3%) was observed in pigs caeca, two of 127 isolates contained C. jejuni, 114 (91.2%) contained C. coli and 11 (8.8%) C. lanienae. Of 11 cases positive for C. lanienea, two were also positive for C. coli. C. lanienae was detected exclusively in pigs caeca samples. Of 180 calf faecal samples, 29 were Campylobacter positive and the predominant species was C. jejuni (82.8%). Human faecal samples had the lowest Campylobacter prevalence (5.3%). Of 23 positive cases, 22 contained C. jejuni.

Antimicrobial resistance and multidrug resistance in different Campylobacter spp. isolates

When combining the isolates from all sources (i.e. broilers, poultry, calves, pigs and humans), there were 434 Campylobacter spp. isolates, 317 of which (234 C. jejuni and 83 C. coli) were analysed for antimicrobial susceptibility. C. Jejuni showed the highest resistance against ciprofloxacin (93.6 %) and nalidixic acid (94 %). C. coli was most resistant against streptomycin (73.5%), which was higher than observed for C. jejuni (15.8%). Both species showed a low resistance against gentamicin and erythromycin, with 6.4% and 0.4% in C. jejuni and 3.6% and 2.4% in C. coli, respectively (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Prevalence of resistant isolates of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, isolated from broilers, poultry, calves, pigs and humans, Latvia, 2008–2016 (n = 317)

Prevalence of resistant isolates of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, isolated from broilers, poultry, calves, pigs and humans, Latvia, 2008–2016 (n = 317) CIP: ciprofloxacin; ERY: erythromycin; GEN: gentamycin; MDR: multidrug-resistant; NAL: nalidixic acid; STR: streptomycin; TET: tetracycline. The data from broilers were compared between years 2008, 2014 and 2016 and resistance of C. jejuni against tetracycline increased significantly from 14.0% in 2008 to 42.5% in 2016 (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08–0.59; p 0.0022) and resistance against streptomycin increased from 14.0% in 2008 to 45.0% in 2016 (OR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08–0.53; p 0.001) (Table 2), accordingly MDR isolates increased from 12.5% in 2008 to 42.5% in 2016 (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.07–0.52; p 0.0009), however in all 3 years the total number of analysed Campylobacter isolates were less than 100 and larger sample set should be analysed to confirm our results.
Table 2

Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter species by origin

Source and year of samplingSpeciesNumber of isolates testedNumber of isolates(resistant/total)
ERYTETCIPNALSTRGENMDR
Broilers, 2008 C. jejuni 570/578/5757/5757/578/5710/577/57
C. coli 80/81/88/88/82/81/81/8
Broilers, 2014 C. jejuni 931/9322/9393/9393/931/933/930/93
Broilers, 2016 C. jejuni 400/4017/4039/4039/4018/400/4018/40
Poultry, 2016 C. jejuni 40/43/43/43/42/40/42/4
Pigs, 2015 C. jejuni 10/11/11/11/11/10/11/1
C. coli 711/7139/7138/7136/7155/711/7121/71
Calves, 2015 C. jejuni 210/2114/2113/2114/214/212/212/21
C. coli 30/33/33/33/33/31/33/3
Humans, 2015 C. jejuni 180/1810/1813/1813/183/180/183/18
C. coli 11/11/11/11/11/10/11/1

C: Campylobacter; CIP: ciprofloxacin; ERY: erythromycin; GEN: gentamycin; MDR: multidrug-resistant; NAL: nalidixic acid; STR: streptomycin; TET: tetracycline.

C: Campylobacter; CIP: ciprofloxacin; ERY: erythromycin; GEN: gentamycin; MDR: multidrug-resistant; NAL: nalidixic acid; STR: streptomycin; TET: tetracycline. The occurrence of MDR in other origin C. jejuni isolates had lower prevalence of MDR, e.g. 9.5% for calf faecal samples and 16.7% for human clinical isolates. For C. coli 29.6% of pig origin, the only human origin and three of three isolates showed MDR (Table 2).

Typing of Campylobacter spp. isolates

Livestock and food isolates of C. jejuni were assigned to six different clonal complexes (CCs) representing nine known sequence types (ST) (Table 3). CC-383 included two broiler isolates with ST-5 and two poultry isolates with ST-6461. Additional poultry sample belonged to CC-283/ST-383. All C. jejuni isolates from calves belonged to CC-21 and were identified as ST-21 and ST-806. The only pig origin C. jejuni analysed belonged to the same type as broilers CC-383/ST-5. From eight analysed C. coli four pig origin and two calf origin isolates showed previously unknown ST. Only two of pig origin C. coli isolates represented previously known CC-828/ST-828 and ST-854.
Table 3

Sequence diversity of human and livestock samples, by sequence clonal complex, multilocus sequence type and core genome multilocus sequence type, Latvia, 2008–2016 (n = 45)

Clonal complexMulti locus sequence type Core genome multi locus sequence typeOrigin (isolates with certain genotype)
21 19 1542Human (1)
1598Human (1)
21 1544Calf (2)
1545Calf (2)
50 587Human (1)
1541Human (1)
1547Human (2)
8061595Calf (2)
1519205Human (1)
206 572 435Human (1)
1596Human (1)
283 267193Human (1)
383251Poultry (1)
353 51546Broiler (2), Pig (1)
6461338Human (3), Poultry (2)
443511543Human (4), Pig (1)
4644641592Human (1)
489181597Calf (1)
49491593Human (3)
828 8281563Pig (1)
8541539Pig (1)
83281591Human (1)
ND ND 1528Human (1)
1529Calf (2)
1535Pig (1)
1537Pig (1)
1538Pig (1)
1540Pig (1)

ND: not determined.

ND: not determined. Human isolates were assigned to eight CCs represented by 10 multilocus STs. The predominant CC belonged to ST-50 (4/23), ST-19 (2/23) and ST-1519 (1/23). In other CC groups, only one ST per group was represented: CC-443 in four isolates with ST-51; CC-353 in three isolates with ST-6461; and CC-49 in three isolates with ST-49. The C. coli isolate did not belong to any known sequence group. A comparison of human origin Campylobacter genomes based on gene by gene typing of Campylobacter jejuni/coli core genome scheme was also conducted. Four different cgMLST clusters (Figure 2; numbered 1, 2, 4 and 8) of human isolates were identified where more than one case representing the same or closely related cgMLST. Ten human isolates represented sporadic cases and were therefore unrelated to the other samples. The available dates of sample collection (Supplement S2) were used to confirm the possible link between genetically related cases. Cluster 1 included three identical human isolates, one-allele distant isolate and one pig origin isolate only five alleles distant, indicating a possible source of infection. Cluster 2 included five isolates in total – three human clinical samples and two poultry meat samples. Although the human samples were collected during 2015 and food samples in 2016, zero allele distance was observed using cgMLST gene by gene typing. The following reference-free SNP comparison showed less than nine different nt positions between isolates (data not shown). In two cases isolates from patients related by place and time were clustered together (clusters 4 and 8).
Figure 2

Minimum spanning tree of 45 Campylobacter isolates

Minimum spanning tree of 45 Campylobacter isolates C: Campylobacter; cgMLST: core genome multilocus sequence typing. Distance based on 637 columns from C. jejuni/coli cgMLST, pairwise ignoring missing values. C. jejuni/coli cgMLST Complex Type/Cluster-Alert distance: 13. The lengths of the edges are not proportional to the numbers. Colours represent the following sample origin: green: human; red: calf; blue: pig; yellow: broiler; purple: poultry; grey background indicates genetically related isolates. Four different clusters (1;2;4;8) with human isolates involved were identified.

Identification of antimicrobial resistance determinants

Antimicrobial resistance determinants were examined using the whole genome sequences and compared with known phenotype data (Table 4 and Supplement S2). In total, 30 Campylobacter isolates showed resistance to quinolones and all of them contained a point mutation in the gyrA gene coding for DNA gyrase subunit A (Thr-86-Ile). The second most common type of resistance was against tetracyclines and all resistant isolates harboured a tet(O) gene. Resistance against aminoglycosides arose from the ant(6)-1b gene that was found in 9 of 12 isolates displaying high resistance against streptomycin (i.e. > 16 µg/mL). In three cases, an additional aph(3’)-IIIa gene encoding aminoglycosides phosphotransferase was detected, suggesting that more than one simultaneous mechanism can give rise to resistance against antimicrobial drugs. Two streptomycin-resistant isolates demonstrated gentamicin resistance as well, in one case the isolate contained ant(6)-1b and aph(3’)-IIIa genes, but in another case the mechanism of resistance was not identified. Additionally, in all of the sequenced isolates, multidrug and bile efflux pump coding operon cmeABC was detected (Supplement S2).
Table 4

Comparison of Campylobacter species resistance and corresponding mechanisms in whole genome sequence, Latvia, 2008–2016

Antimicrobial drugDrug classResistance mechanism, gene or mutationResistance principleIsolates with resistant phenotypeIsolates with resistance mechanism
Nalidixic AcidQuinolones gyrA Thr-86-IleAntibiotic target alteration3030
Ciprofloxacin gyrA Thr-86-IleAntibiotic target alteration3030
TetracyclineTetracyclines tet(O) Antibiotic target protection2727
Streptomycin Aminoglycosides ant(6)-Ib Antibiotic inactivation129
APH(3')-IIIa Antibiotic inactivation123
Gentamycin ant(6)-Ib Antibiotic inactivation20
APH(3')-IIIa Antibiotic inactivation20
ErythromycinMacrolides23S RNA mutationsAntibiotic target alteration10

Virulence-associated genes

All genomes were examined for a broad range of virulence-associated genes, including motility, adherence, invasion and toxin genes; the majority of genes were represented in all of the analysed genomes, except for a few cases (Supplement S2). Some of the analysed virulence genes were present only in C. jejuni, but not in C. coli: N-linked glycosylation gene (pglG), cytochrome C551 peroxidase (cj0020c) and major antigenic peptide (peb3). Three genes i.e. cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC (coding for the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) subunits A, B and C, respectively) were confirmed in all C. jejuni isolates; in C. coli, only genes cdtB and cdtC were detectable. In a single C. jejuni isolate from pigs caeca, several genes of the virulence plasmid pVir was identified. This plasmid encodes the type IV secretion system and could be potentially involved in adhesion and invasion. Of note, the wlaN gene associated with Guillain–Barré syndrome was identified in six C. jejuni isolated from calves’ faeces and in seven of 23 human origin C. jejuni isolates, all the wlaN carriers belonged to CC-21.

Discussion

In this study, the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in various sources were analysed focussing on AMR and the respective gene diversity, resistance determinants and virulence factors. The highest prevalence was observed in pigs where 83.3% analysed samples contained Campylobacter, mainly C. coli, followed by broilers with average 50.3% positive samples, mainly C. jejuni. Although the prevalence of Campylobacter observed in livestock in Latvia was higher than on average in the EU, the proportion of positive cases in fresh broiler meat was lower than the EU average in 2016, according to data from 14 countries [1]. Broiler meat is considered as one of the major sources of campylobacteriosis and lower contamination rate can partly explain the low number of human campylobacteriosis cases in Latvia. The broiler population in Latvia has been studied before and more than 90% of broilers intestine samples contained Campylobacter in 2010 [5]. Here, we report data collected from the same two broiler slaughterhouses in 2008, 2014 and 2016 where we found the lowest prevalence in 2008 and the highest in 2014, suggesting that there is not an overall tendency but various factors can affect Campylobacter contamination in the broiler flocks. In addition, Kovalenko et al. reported C. coli in samples from the investigated slaughterhouses in 2010 [6]; we observed C. coli in 2008, but not in 2014 and 2016. These data can serve as the starting point for deeper investigation of broiler population to evaluate the factors contributing to the dynamics of Campylobacter infection. Monitoring of AMR of zoonotic bacteria has revealed an alarming trend of C. jejuni resistance profile in broilers. The proportion of streptomycin and tetracycline resistant isolates have significantly increased when comparing data from 2008 and 2016. Latvia has one of the highest proportions of fluoroquinolone-resistant C. jejuni, at 97.5% compared with the average proportion in the EU at 67%. Tetracycline, erythromycin and gentamycin resistance was at similar level for Latvia and the EU [23]. In all of the quinolone-resistant isolates, mutation in the DNA gyrase subunit A, resulting in Thr-86-Ile substitution, was identified and this was not found in any of the sequenced susceptible isolates. This mutation has been previously linked to the quinolone-resistance together with less common mutations Asp-90-Asn, Ala-70-Thr in the same region have been reported [24], but the latter were not detected in selected set of isolates. The Campylobacter determinants of resistance against aminoglycosides were quite diverse. The streptomycin-resistant (MIC > 16 mg/mL) strains in most cases carried ant(6)-Ib gene, however for two isolates no previously published mechanisms could be attributed. For another C. jejuni isolate showing low level resistance (MIC < 4mg/mL) against both streptomycin and gentamycin, we did not find any known aminoglycoside-specific resistance mechanism. Three C. coli isolates from various hosts showed resistance to streptomycin and in one case also to gentamycin and contained the aphA(3’)-IIIa gene addition to ant(6)-Ib gene. No phenotypic differences were observed when comparing isolates with one or both resistance genes. In 2017, Cantero et al. performed WGS on 16 C. jejuni and C. coli strains isolated from broilers and did not find molecular mechanisms responsible for streptomycin resistance in most of the strains. The presence of undiscovered genes, possibly encoded in plasmids, was assumed [25]. One of the most interesting findings in our study was the identification of bla-OXA-184 gene in five isolates from human clinical samples and a pig sample. Analysis by cgMLST demonstrated these isolates clustered together, pointing to a link between human and pig strains. In 34 other isolates from various hosts, the bla-OXA-61 gene was identified, which has been previously reported as present in C. jejuni and C. coli [11,26]. Since the routine AMR monitoring for Campylobacter spp. does not include the beta-lactam class of antibiotics, the genotype to phenotype accordance cannot be determined in this case. In all of the sequenced isolates three genes of MDR efflux pump cmeABC were detected. CmeABC is an intrinsic resistance mechanism against fluoroquinolones, macrolides and cephalosporines in Campylobacter spp. and is constitutively expressed in wild type strains [27]. Since this mechanism was found in all strains independently of their resistance profile, additional mechanisms responsible for clinically significant level of related drug resistance must be identified and deeper analysis looking for genetic variation related to resistance level should be performed. WGS data analysis was also used to characterise the diversity of Campylobacter populations from various sources and to study the correlation between sources and genotype. The C. jejuni population in calves was mainly characterised by the presence of CC-21. The same CC was isolated from dairy cattle in Lithuania [28] and Austria [29] and is widely distributed between humans and poultry [30]. CC-21 was the most common CC between human clinical isolates as well, but STs between human clinical isolates and calf samples do not overlap and calves or dairy products as infection source should not be assumed. CC-21 was represented in human clinical isolates and poultry samples from Lithuania and Estonia [28,31]; one ST was the same as isolated in from humans in Latvia (ST-50). In order to identify and confirm the possible source of this significant fraction of human isolates in Latvia, it is necessary to study a representative sample set of CC-21 including strains from various sources and countries, taking onto account the high rate of zoonotic transmission between different species [30]. Although only few Campylobacter strains from broilers and poultry could be included in WGS analysis, two interesting observations were made. First, we classified two broiler C. jejuni isolates as ST-5, the same type isolated in Estonia from poultry originating from Latvia [31]. The evidence from WGS can be used to confirm that systematic contamination happened in the food production chain. Second, we identified ST-6461 in human clinical isolates and poultry samples. All five isolates belonged to one and the same cgMLST, with no distant alleles, even though 18 months have passed between the collection of the first and last sample (the individual sample collection date reported in Supplement S2). We believe these human patients were infected from poultry and the genetic and other factors that have enabled the conservation of this genotype for prolonged periods of time should be further investigated. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Latvia that aims to characterise Campylobacter prevalence from sources other than broilers and poultry, which up until now has been the main risk studied for campylobacteriosis in humans. In order to get a complete picture regarding the situation in Latvia, it is necessary to include a representative sample set in the analysis of WGS with special attention to broiler isolates, including those from neighbouring countries. In addition to significant data about the prevalence of certain genotypes, WGS data analysis can help to elucidate the genetic, virulence and resistance mechanisms. Characterisation of bacterial phenotypes and analysing these data complimentary to bacterial genetic profiles holds a great promise for deciphering the mechanisms of resistance [10,32]. Our findings demonstrate the importance of rigorous surveillance for Campylobacter contamination within the food manufacturing chains, using standardised analytical procedures and regular data sharing between at least the neighbouring countries.
  24 in total

1.  Campylobacteriosis outbreak associated with ingestion of mud during a mountain bike race.

Authors:  T L Stuart; J Sandhu; R Stirling; J Corder; A Ellis; P Misa; S Goh; B Wong; P Martiquet; L Hoang; E Galanis
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Updating benchtop sequencing performance comparison.

Authors:  Sebastian Jünemann; Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck; Karola Prior; Andreas Albersmeier; Uwe John; Jörn Kalinowski; Alexander Mellmann; Alexander Goesmann; Arndt von Haeseler; Jens Stoye; Dag Harmsen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Colony multiplex PCR assay for identification and differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. fetus subsp. fetus.

Authors:  Gehua Wang; Clifford G Clark; Tracy M Taylor; Chad Pucknell; Connie Barton; Lawrence Price; David L Woodward; Frank G Rodgers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Mechanisms of fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance in Campylobacter spp.

Authors:  Sophie Payot; Jean-Michel Bolla; Deborah Corcoran; Séamus Fanning; Francis Mégraud; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.700

Review 6.  Antibiotic resistance and resistance mechanisms in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  David A Alfredson; Victoria Korolik
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Campylobacter spp. as a Foodborne Pathogen: A Review.

Authors:  Joana Silva; Daniela Leite; Mariana Fernandes; Cristina Mena; Paul Anthony Gibbs; Paula Teixeira
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Multilocus sequence typing as a replacement for serotyping in Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  Mark Achtman; John Wain; François-Xavier Weill; Satheesh Nair; Zhemin Zhou; Vartul Sangal; Mary G Krauland; James L Hale; Heather Harbottle; Alexandra Uesbeck; Gordon Dougan; Lee H Harrison; Sylvain Brisse
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  A large waterborne outbreak of campylobacteriosis in Norway: the need to focus on distribution system safety.

Authors:  Irena Jakopanec; Katrine Borgen; Line Vold; Helge Lund; Tore Forseth; Raisa Hannula; Karin Nygård
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 10.  Resistance mechanisms in Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Nicole M Iovine
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.882

View more
  7 in total

1.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni from Human Campylobacteriosis in Taiwan, 2016 to 2019.

Authors:  Ying-Shu Liao; Bo-Han Chen; Ru-Hsiou Teng; You-Wun Wang; Jui-Hsien Chang; Shiu-Yun Liang; Chi-Sen Tsao; Yu-Ping Hong; Hui-Yung Sung; Chien-Shun Chiou
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  Antibiotic Resistance in Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Broiler Chicken Meat and Human Patients in Estonia.

Authors:  Triin Tedersoo; Mati Roasto; Mihkel Mäesaar; Liidia Häkkinen; Veljo Kisand; Marina Ivanova; Marikki Heidi Valli; Kadrin Meremäe
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-22

3.  Zoonotic Transmission of Campylobacter jejuni to Caretakers From Sick Pen Calves Carrying a Mixed Population of Strains With and Without Guillain Barré Syndrome-Associated Lipooligosaccharide Loci.

Authors:  Jessica L St Charles; Phillip T Brooks; Julia A Bell; Husnain Ahmed; Mia Van Allen; Shannon D Manning; Linda S Mansfield
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Emergence of a Novel tet(L) Variant in Campylobacter spp. of Chicken Origin in China.

Authors:  Hong Yao; Dian Jiao; Wenbo Zhao; Aijuan Li; Ruichao Li; Xiang-Dang Du
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Identification and Characterization of Campylobacter Species in Livestock, Humans, and Water in Livestock Owning Households of Peri-urban Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A One Health Approach.

Authors:  Gemechu Chala; Tadesse Eguale; Fufa Abunna; Daniel Asrat; Andrew Stringer
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-02

Review 6.  Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria-A Review.

Authors:  Renata Urban-Chmiel; Agnieszka Marek; Dagmara Stępień-Pyśniak; Kinga Wieczorek; Marta Dec; Anna Nowaczek; Jacek Osek
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09

7.  Whole Resistome Analysis in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli Genomes Available in Public Repositories.

Authors:  José F Cobo-Díaz; Paloma González Del Río; Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.