Literature DB >> 31367296

HDAC inhibitors as antifibrotic drugs in cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis.

Xing Lyu1, Min Hu1, Jieting Peng2, Xiangyu Zhang3, Yan Y Sanders4.   

Abstract

Fibrosis usually results from dysregulated wound repair and is characterized by excessive scar tissue. It is a complex process with unclear mechanisms. Accumulating evidence indicates that epigenetic alterations, including histone acetylation, play a pivotal role in this process. Histone acetylation is governed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). HDACs are enzymes that remove the acetyl groups from both histone and nonhistone proteins. Aberrant HDAC activities are observed in fibrotic diseases, including cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis. HDAC inhibitors (HDACIs) are molecules that block HDAC functions. HDACIs have been studied extensively in a variety of tumors. Currently, there are four HDACIs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for cancer treatment yet none for fibrotic diseases. Emerging evidence from in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies has presented beneficial effects of HDACIs in preventing or reversing fibrogenesis. In this review, we summarize the latest findings of the roles of HDACs in the pathogenesis of cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis and highlight the potential applications of HDACIs in these two fibrotic diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HDAC; HDAC inhibitor; cardiac fibrosis; epigenetic; gene expression; histone acetylation; myofibroblasts; pulmonary fibrosis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31367296      PMCID: PMC6643173          DOI: 10.1177/2040622319862697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis        ISSN: 2040-6223            Impact factor:   4.970


Introduction

When responding to injury, damaged tissue begins the repair process to recover the tissue’s original architecture and function. This injury–repair process is complex and must be well orchestrated. Dysregulation of this process would result in fibrosis and ultimately organ failure.[1] Fibrosis can affect many organs, including the heart and lungs.[2] Despite the different pathways in the different processes of organ fibrosis, there are some core signal pathways, such as transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), which is activated in virtually all fibrotic process.[3] TGF-β1 activates fibroblasts to become myofibroblasts.[4] Myofibroblasts are the key effector cells, characterized by the production of extracellular matrix (ECM) and the expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA).[4] The pathogenesis of fibrosis is unclear, for example, it is not completely understood why myofibroblasts are transient in the normal injury–repair process but are persistent in fibrotic diseases.[5] Increasing evidence reveals that epigenetic mechanisms play a pivotal role in this process and indicates that epigenetic methods may provide great therapeutic opportunities for this disorder. Epigenetic process refers to the inheritable alterations in phenotype without changes in gene sequence,[6] which is critical in regulating gene expression. There are three major epigenetic modifications: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and microRNAs .[7,8] Histone modification is a reversible process, which indicates the covalent posttranslational modification of histone proteins, including methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, adenylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, and ADP ribosylation.[9] The most common and best-characterized histone modification is acetylation. The acetylation of histone is governed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs),[10] which work together to control histone acetylation (Figure 1A). HATs catalyze the transfer of acetyl groups from acetyl-CoA to the lysine ε-amino groups on the N-terminal tails of histones, which weakens the interaction of the histone tail and DNA, promoting transcriptional activation. In contrast, HDACs remove the acetyl groups from acetylated histones, increase chromatin condensation, and suppress gene transcription.[11]
Figure 1.

A. Histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases control histone acetylation. HATs transfer the acetyl groups to the lysine residuals on histone proteins; this weakens the interaction of histone and DNA to promote gene transcription. HDACs remove the acetyl groups on histone proteins, increase chromatin condensation, and suppress gene transcription. There are four major classes of HDACs, as listed.

Ac, acetylated histone; HATs, histone acetyltransferases; HDACs, histone deacetylases.

B. HDAC inhibitors target various processes in which HDACs are involved in cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis. Cardiac or pulmonary injury/stress can trigger the remodeling of the heart or lung tissues. This involves many processes, such as inflammation, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), or endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT). EMT (or EndMT) provides additional fibroblasts for the remodeling process. The fibroblasts, regardless of their origins, differentiate into myofibroblasts, the central effector cells of the remodeling process. Dysregulation of this remodeling process leads to cardiac or pulmonary fibrosis. Different HDACs are involved in this process, which could be blocked by various HDAC inhibitors to improve the resolution of fibrosis.

A. Histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases control histone acetylation. HATs transfer the acetyl groups to the lysine residuals on histone proteins; this weakens the interaction of histone and DNA to promote gene transcription. HDACs remove the acetyl groups on histone proteins, increase chromatin condensation, and suppress gene transcription. There are four major classes of HDACs, as listed. Ac, acetylated histone; HATs, histone acetyltransferases; HDACs, histone deacetylases. B. HDAC inhibitors target various processes in which HDACs are involved in cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis. Cardiac or pulmonary injury/stress can trigger the remodeling of the heart or lung tissues. This involves many processes, such as inflammation, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), or endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT). EMT (or EndMT) provides additional fibroblasts for the remodeling process. The fibroblasts, regardless of their origins, differentiate into myofibroblasts, the central effector cells of the remodeling process. Dysregulation of this remodeling process leads to cardiac or pulmonary fibrosis. Different HDACs are involved in this process, which could be blocked by various HDAC inhibitors to improve the resolution of fibrosis. Interactions between HATs and HDACs control the acetylation status, and the HATs and HDACs are usually linked or physically associated with other proteins that have catalytic activities[12] or are regulatory factors.[13] It is critical to consider their roles in a cellular context–dependent manner and their interactions with other regulators.[14] For example, inhibition of HAT p300 decreases the transcription of collagen and α-SMA in cardiac fibrosis by blocking the acetylated histone associated with the genes.[15] On the other hand, inhibition of HDAC induces general histone acetylation yet decreases collagen expression by depleted association of acetylated histone at the collagen promoter region.[16] The mechanisms of this change is not clear, but emerging data have shown that HDAC inhibition can induce histone deacetylation at a localized promoter to downregulate the target genes.[16-19] In addition to histone, many transcriptional factors such as Sp1 and nuclear factor (NF)-kB are also targets of HDAC deacetylation.[20,21] Inhibition of HDAC would also affect these proteins, which would affect the target gene transcription. A study in lymphoma cells observed increased transcriptional factor Sp1 acetylation by HDAC inhibition, which significantly decreased the binding of Sp1 to the Bcl-2 promoter region and contributed to Bcl-2 downregulation.[19] Thus, extensive evaluations of associated proteins that are involved in the transcriptional control of a target gene are needed to determine gene expression change when inhibiting HDAC. HDACs are involved in many cellular processes. Dysfunction of the HDACs is associated with various diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, and cardiac hypertrophy.[22-24] HDAC inhibitors (HDACIs) are molecules that bind with HDACs and interfere/block their functions.[25] HDACIs are involved in processes such as regulating gene expression and apoptosis, through acetylation of histone and nonhistone proteins.[17,22] Currently, four HDACIs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use in hematologic tumors.[26] There are many clinical trials in progress of HDACIs for a variety of tumors[27] (Table 1). However, for many other diseases, such as fibrotic diseases, HDACIs are only in preclinical studies. In the past decade, a growing number of studies have demonstrated that HDACs are involved in the initiation and progression of fibrosis in multiple organs, including heart,[28] lung,[29] liver,[30] and kidney.[31] HDACIs have been shown to ameliorate various forms of fibrosis in animal models.[16,32,33] In this review, we focus on the latest findings of the roles of HDACs in the pathogenesis of cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis and highlight the potential applications and limitations of HDACIs in these two fibrotic diseases.
Table 1.

HDACIs in clinical trials.

HDACIClassHDAC TargetClinical UsagePhaseReference
Vorinostat (SAHA, Zolinza®)HydroxamatesClass I, II, and IVCTCLPhase IIDuvic et al.[34]
Soft tissue sarcomasPhase IISchmitt et al.[35]
Sickle cell diseasePhase I/IIOkam et al.[36]
MelanomaPhase IIHaas et al.[37]
Gastrointestinal cancerPhase IDoi et al.[38]
Follicular and mantle cell lymphomaPhase IWatanabe et al.[39]
Prostate cancerPhase IIBradley et al.[40]
Glioblastoma multiformePhase IIGalanis et al.[41]
HIV infectionPhase IIElliott et al.[42]
Panobinostat (LBH589, Farydac®)HydroxamatesClass I and IIMDS or AMLPhase 3Bug et al.[43]
Metastatic melanomaPhase IIbrahim et al.[44]
Neuroendocrine tumorsPhase IIJin et al.[45]
Solid tumorsPhase IJones et al.[46]
HIV infectionPhase I/IIOlesen et al.[47]
Belinostat (Beleodaq™, PXD101)HydroxamatesClass I and IILymphomaPhase IIPuvvada et al.[48]
PTCLPhase IIO’Connor et al.[49]; Foss et al.[50]
Liver cancerPhase I/IIWang et al.[51]; Yeo et al.[52]
Ovarian cancer.Phase IIDizon et al.[53]
Givinostat (ITF2357)HydroxamatesClass I and IIDuchenne muscular dystrophyPhase I/IIBettica et al.[54]
Polycythemia veraPhase IIFinazzi et al.[55]
Myeloproliferative diseasesPhase IIARambaldi et al.[56]
Romidepsin (FK228, Istodax®)Cyclic tetrapeptideClass I and IIPTCLPhase IIShustov et al.[57]
Non–small-cell lung cancerPhase IGerber et al.[58]
HIV infectionPhase ISogaard et al.[59]
Entinostat (MS-275)BenzamidesClass IMetastatic colorectal cancerPhase IIAzad et al.[60]
Breast cancerPhase IIConnolly et al.[61]
Hodgkin lymphomaPhase IIBatlevi et al.[62]
Myeloid neoplasmPhase IIPrebet et al.[63]; Fandy et al.[64]
Valproic acid (VPA)Short-chain fatty acidsClass IGastric cancerPhase IIFushida et al.[65]
Non-small cell lung cancerPhase IChu et al.[66]
Rectal cancerPhase I/IIAvallone et al.[67]

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CTCL, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

HDACIs in clinical trials. AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CTCL, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis

Cardiac fibrosis is the final stage of various cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic, dilated, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.[68] Excess deposition of ECM, such as collagen and fibronectin, impairs cardiac systolic and diastolic functions, disrupts electrical conduction, and predisposes to fatal arrhythmias, heart failure, even sudden death.[69,70] Although our knowledge of cardiac fibrosis has advanced tremendously over the past decade, there are still no viable therapies to reverse this disorder. Similarly, a variety of lung injuries and diseases result in pulmonary fibrosis.[71] The most common and pernicious form of pulmonary fibrosis is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).[72] IPF is a chronic progressive disease with high mortality and unknown etiology.[73] The mechanisms governing fibrosis are not well understood, but studies show that epigenetic mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis.[74,75] HDACs participate in the process of cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis.[76-78] HDACIs are reported to improve the resolution of these two kinds of fibrosis in preclinical studies .[17,79] We reviewed the role of DNA methylation in organ fibrosis[80]; here, we focus on HDAC family members in the process of cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis.

HDACs, HDACIs, and related clinical/preclinical studies

HDACs

Eighteen HDACs have been identified in mammals (Figure 1A) and are classified into four groups based on their homology to yeast proteins.[81] Class I includes HDAC 1, 2, 3, and 8, which exist in the nucleus. Class II has HDAC 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10; these enzymes shuttle between the cytoplasm and nucleus, which further divide into two subgroups as Class IIa (HDAC 4, 5, 7, and 9) and Class IIb (HDAC 6, 10). HDAC11 is the sole member of Class IV, which shares the catalytic domain of both class I and II HDACs. These three classes of HDACs are all zinc-dependent enzymes, usually called classical HDACs.[82] However, Class III HDAC, including sirtuins 1–7, is nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) dependent. Sirtuins are most commonly correlated with aging.[83] We focus on the classical HDACs and their inhibitors in this review. In addition to histone proteins, HDACs also deacetylate many nonhistone proteins to control diverse cellular processes.[84] As we mentioned earlier, some transcriptional factors are targets of acetylation, whose activities can be affected by HDAC or HDACI.[85] It is important to note that acetylation and deacetylation occur not only in the nucleus but also in the cytoplasm, and they influence the functions of target substrates.[84]

HDACIs

In general, the zinc-dependent HDACIs have three pharmacophores: a Zn2+-binding group, a polar connection unit, and a surface binding or cap group.[86] Based on the structure of the Zn2+-binding group, the HDACIs are divided into four structurally distinct groups: (a) hydroxamic acids, (b) short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), (c) benzamides, and (d) cyclic peptides.[87] The group of SCFAs is further categorized into four classes according to their distinguished structures: linear compounds, cyclic tetrapeptides, cyclic depsipeptides, and miscellaneous HDACIs.[87,88] The first discovered HDACI was trichrostatin A (TSA), identified from nature sources.[89] Since then, numerous natural HDACI products have been obtained from microbes, dietary plants, and medicinal plants.[90] HDACIs have emerged as a new class of anticancer drugs; a series of HDACIs have been synthesized and the number of HDACIs is constantly being updated. HDACIs target histone and nonhistone proteins. Many acetylated nonhistone proteins are deacetylated by HDACs[84] and can be modulated by HDACIs.[91] These nonhistone proteins include structure proteins (such as α-tubulin), chaperone proteins (such as Hsp90), DNA binding nuclear receptors (such as androgen receptor), transcriptional factors (such as p53), signaling mediators, and enzymes.[92] Therefore, HDACIs not only modulate the histone but also nonhistone protein acetylation statuses and affect their functions. For example, Quisinostat, a novel second-generation HDACI, increases p53 acetylation at K382/K373 sites, upregulates p21, and results in G1 phase arrest.[93] Panobinostat is a pan-HDACI that is approved for cancer treatment; its cytotoxicity is linked to α-tubulin acetylation.[94] Panobinostat is one of the four US FDA-approved HDACIs for clinical use, all of which are anticancer drugs. Panobinostat (Farydac®, Novartis) is a hydroxamic acid, a Class I and II HDACI, and was approved for treating multiple myeloma in 2015.[95] Belinostat (Beleodaq™, Spectrum) is a pan-HDACI that was approved for treating patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in 2014.[96] Romidepsin (Istodax®, Celgene) obtained FDA approval for treating cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in 2009[97] and then in 2011 was granted approval for treating PTCL.[98] Vorinostat (Zolinza®, Merck, also known as SAHA, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) was the first approved pan-HDACI for the treatment of T-cell lymphoma in 2006.[99] In addition to these HDACIs approved for clinical use, there are many clinical trials of HDACIs in other diseases[34-67] (Table 1). SAHA was used in a phase II clinical trial to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected individuals[42] and in phase I/II clinical trials of sickle cell disease[36] with promising results. Givinostat (ITF2357), the hydroxamic acid HDACI, exhibited impressive therapeutic benefit and an excellent safety profile in a study in systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis.[100] Although there is no approved clinical trial on HDACI in fibrotic diseases, many HDACIs are under extensive investigation in preclinical fibrotic models, including cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis[101-103] (Figure 1B). The preclinical studies of HDACIs in cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.

HDACIs used in cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis.

DiseaseCell or animal modelHDACIMechanismReference
Cardiac fibrosisSpontaneously HP ratsValproic acidMineralocorticoid receptor acetylationKang et al.[104]
Pressure overload induced by abdominal aortic constrictionValproic acidInhibit sympathetic outflowLiu et al.[105]
Ang II–induced cardiac fibrosis rats, myocardial pericytesValproic acidHDAC 4–dependent phosphorylation of ERKZhang et al.[106]
Left anterior descending coronary artery ligation MI miceValproic acid, tributyrinRegulate histone H4 acetylation and atrial natriuretic peptide mRNA expressionLee et al.[107]
Left anterior descending coronary artery ligation MI miceTrichostatin AThrough c-kit signalingZhang et al.[108]
Isoproterenol induced HF ratsMPT0E014Decrease TGF-β and Ang II type I receptorKao et al.[109]
Left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion–induced MIMocetinostatReduce Akt/GSK3b signaling; increase apoptosisNural-Guvener et al.[110]
Coronary artery occlusion–induced MI rats, cardiac fibroblastsMocetinostatAttenuate interleukin-6/Stat3 signalingNural-Guvener et al.[111]
Ang II and aortic banding–induced cardiac hypertrophy miceTrichostatin A Valproic acid SK-7041Inhibit Class I HDACKee et al.[112]
Ang II–induced cardiac fibrosisMGCD0103Control differentiation of bone marrow-derived fibrocytesWilliams et al.[113]
Isoproterenol-induced cardiac fibrosis ratsTubacinElevate RASSF1A expressionTao et al.[114]
Streptozotocin-induced diabetes miceSodium butyrateActivate glucose transporters 1 acetylation and p38 phosphorylationChen et al.[115]
Type 1 diabetes OVE26 miceRGFP966Inhibit DUSP5/ERK1/2 pathwayXu et al.[116]
Deoxycorticosterone acetate–salt HP ratsSAHADecrease inflammatory cytokinesIyer et al.[117]
Aortic constriction cardiac–induced HP miceTrichostatin ASuppress NF-κB target genesOoi et al.[118]
Left descending coronary artery ligation–induced MIValproic acidThrough Foxm1 pathwayTian et al.[119]
Left descending coronary artery ligation–induced MIGivinostatDecrease EMT and inflammationMilan et al.[120]
Primary cardiac fibroblastsTrichostatin A MGCD0103 ApicidinBlock cell cycle progressionSchuetze et al.[121]
Atrial fibrosisHOPX miceTrichostatin ANormalize connexin40 remodellingLiu et al.[32]
HOPX mice, dogs with sustained atrial fibrillationCI-994Seki et al.[122]
Deoxycorticosterone acetate–induced HP ratsCG200745Decrease collagen 1, collagen 3 connective tissue growth factor and fibronectinLee et al.[123]
Pulmonary fibrosisPrimary human lung fibroblastsSAHAInhibit myofibroblast differentiationWang et al.[124]
Bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis mice, IPF fibroblastsSAHADown-regulate collagen 3A1expressionIncreased lung fibroblast apoptosisZhang et al.[16];Sanders et al.[17]
Lung fibroblastsSAHAUp-regulate cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E2 expressionPasini et al.[125]
TGF-β1–induced EMT A549 cellValproic acidInhibit EMT, increase H3K27acNoguchi et al.[126]
Paraquat-induced pulmonary fibrosis, macrophagesValproic acidEnhance EMT, activate H3K4me3 and H3K9acHu et al.[127]
TGF-β1 induced EMT A549 cell line, bleomycin induced pulmonary fibrosisTrichostatin ARestore surfactant protein-C expression via hyperacetylation of histone H4Ota et al.[128]
Bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosisTrichostatin AInhibit HDAC2 expressionYe et al.[129]
IPF and normal fibroblastsSpiruchostatin AIncrease H3 acetylation and p21expressionDavies et al.[130]
Bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis, lung fibroblastsTubastatinRepress TGF-β–PI3K-Akt pathwaySaito et al.[78]
IPF lung tissue, normal human lung fibroblasts, bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosisNCC170Ameliorate TGF-β1–induced loss of H3K27ac at the PPAR-γ gene enhancerSaito et al.[131]
IPF lung tissue, primary IPF fibroblastsLBH589 Valproic acidDecrease ECM synthesis associated gene expressionKorfei et al.[103]
IPF lung fibroblasts, bleomycin-induced fibrosis miceTrichostatin ARestore Fas-mediated apoptosisHuang et al.[132]

Ang II, angiotensin II; DUSP5, dual specific phosphatase 5; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal; HDAC, histone deacetylases; HDACI, histone deacetylation inhibitor; HF, heart failure; HOPX, overexpressing homeodomain-only protein; HP, hypertension; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; MI, myocardial infarction; RASSF1ARas-association domain family protein 1A; SAHA, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β.

HDACIs used in cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis. Ang II, angiotensin II; DUSP5, dual specific phosphatase 5; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal; HDAC, histone deacetylases; HDACI, histone deacetylation inhibitor; HF, heart failure; HOPX, overexpressing homeodomain-only protein; HP, hypertension; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; MI, myocardial infarction; RASSF1ARas-association domain family protein 1A; SAHA, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β.

HDACs and HDACIs in cardiac fibrosis

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that HDACs are dysregulated in cardiac fibrosis.[133,134] Myocardial hypertrophy is both a pathological cause and a result of cardiac fibrosis. Initially, Class IIa HDACs were thought to act as endogenous inhibitors of cardiac hypertrophy.[135] The first connection between HDACs and cardiac remodeling was the finding that Class IIa HDACs interact with myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2), a key regulator of myocardial hypertrophy.[136] Subsequent studies found that MEF2 interacts with HDAC4, HDAC5, and HDAC9 of Class IIa; overexpression of these HDACs decreases MEF2 expression and attenuates myocardial hypertrophy.[135] However, recent studies elucidated that Class IIa HDACs also exert profibrotic functions.[28,133,137,138] For example, cardiomyocyte-specific HDAC4 overexpression promotes cardiac hypertrophy and exacerbates interstitial fibrosis in the model of MI in 6-month-old mice.[133] In another model of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis with natriuretic peptide receptor-A knockout mice, the HDAC7 expression is upregulated in parallel with an increase in TGF-β1 and collagen I.[28] In addition to Class IIa involvement in cardiac remodeling, genetic studies have suggested that Class I and IIb HDACs are also involved.[76,134] Downregulation of HDAC1 and HDAC2 by gallic acid attenuated cardiac fibrosis in rat primary cardiac fibroblasts and in hypertensive mice.[134] HDAC3 was upregulated in an experimental model of heart failure; suppression of HDAC3 improved cardiac function and limited ventricular fibrosis.[139] HDAC6 activity was increased in deoxycorticosterone acetate–salt hypertensive rats and spontaneous hypertensive rats,[76,140] and HDAC6 contributed to cardiac dysfunction and skeletal muscle wasting.[141] With the involvement of HDACs in the tissue remodeling process, many studies explored whether HDACIs could be used to correct the pathological remodeling in cardiac fibrosis. One of the major challenges in fibrotic disease is the increased myofibroblasts, the major effector cells of fibrosis.[4] Many preclinical studies have demonstrated that pan or selective HDACIs could reverse myofibroblasts activation, blunt myocardial hypertrophy, and preserve cardiac function in different myocardial hypertrophic and heart failure animal models.[104,105,107,110] SAHA was reported to improve the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase activity in cardiac myocytes.[142] Some other pan-HDACIs also demonstrated their efficacy in cardiac fibrosis. Valproic acid (VPA)-attenuated cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats by affecting the mineralocorticoid receptor acetylation[104]; it also prevented right ventricular hypertrophy in the rat.[143] In a study of a rat model of pressure overload, VPA inhibited sympathetic outflow and cardiac remodeling.[105] VPA was reported to ameliorate Ang II-induced pericyte-myofibroblast transdifferentiation and cardiac fibrosis through HDAC4-dependent phosphorylation of ERK.[106] VPA and tributyrin attenuated ventricular remodeling after infarction, likely through histone H4 acetylation and atrial natriuretic peptide mRNA expression in the cardiomyocytes.[107] A recent study demonstrated that VPA attenuated atrial remodeling and delayed the onset of atrial fibrillation in transgenic mice.[144] Other pan-HDACIs, such as MPT0E014, showed antifibrotic activities by decreasing TGF-β and Ang II type I receptor expressions in isoproterenol-induced dilated cardiomyopathy,[109] whereas TSA promoted myocardial repair and prevented cardiac remodeling via c-kit signaling.[108] TSA was reported to reverse atrial fibrosis and reduce the incidence of arrhythmia, without affecting the level of Ang II.[32] In a later study by the same group, the researchers used the same mice model, and a dog model of sustained atrial fibrosis demonstrated that Class I HDAC inhibitor CI-994 reduced atrial fibrillation and fibrosis.[122] These results provide evidence that HDACIs may be a new therapeutic option for atrial fibrillation. In addition to pan-HDACIs, selective HDACIs have also demonstrated antifibrotic properties. The selective Class I HDACI, Mocetinostat, inhibited the upregulated HDAC1 and 2 in an animal model of congestive heart failure by reversing myofibroblast phenotype and increasing apoptosis.[110] Mocetinostat was also reported to attenuate interleukin (IL)-6/Stat3 signaling and decrease interstitial fibrosis and scar size in ventricular tissue in a rat model of heart failure.[111] In a study of cardiac hypertrophy, the Class I HDAC inhibitor SK-7041, similar to pan-HDACIs TSA and VPA, partially reversed pre-established cardiac hypertrophy.[112] MGCD0103 is another selective class I HDACI that inhibited Ang II-induced cardiac fibrosis by controlling the differentiation of bone marrow-derived fibrocytes.[113] Inhibition of Class I HDACs with Apicidin derivative was able to prevent cardiac hypertrophy and failure in preclinical studies.[145] HDAC6 of the class II HDACs was upregulated in cardiac fibroblast activation and fibrosis.[76,140] Inhibition of HDAC6 by siRNA or its inhibitor, Tubacin, attenuated TGF-β1-induced myofibroblast markers, elevated Ras-association domain family protein 1A, and reduced cardiac fibrosis.[114] HDAC inhibition also has protective effects on the diabetic heart. Diabetes can induce severe cardiovascular complications including diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), a myocardial disorder without coronary artery disease by unclear mechanisms.[115,116] Pan-HDACI sodium butyrate reduced interstitial collagen deposition and attenuated cardiac hypertrophy by mitigating apoptosis, increasing antioxidant SOD1, stimulating angiogenesis, and activating glucose transporters 1 acetylation and p38 phosphorylation in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic model.[115] Selective inhibitor RGFP966 of HDAC3 prevented fibrosis and the development of DCM by blocking the elevated phosphorylated ERK1/2, and upregulating dual specific phosphatase 5 (DUSP5) through increased acetylated histone H3 at DUSP5 promoter region in diabetic hearts.[116] In addition to the above-mentioned antifibrotic aspects of HDACIs, these inhibitors are reported to reduce inflammatory processes associated with fibrotic diseases. During fibrogenesis, including myocardial fibrogenesis, proinflammatory cytokines play an important role in fibroblast activation.[146] HDACs are regulators of inflammation and immunity.[147] Targeting proinflammatory cytokines exerts antifibrotic effects and improves cardiac function.[117,119,120] SAHA was reported to decrease inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1α and vascular endothelial growth factor in deoxycorticosterone acetate–salt hypertensive rats.[117] VPA and Givinostat exhibited similar effects as SAHA in spontaneously hypertensive rats and an acute MI mouse model, inhibited proinflammatory cytokines production.[119,120] These results demonstrate that HDACs are involved in inflammatory-mediated cardiac fibrosis. Many studies with HDACIs demonstrated that these compounds exert overlapping and divergent effects. HDACIs are classified into different groups based on their chemical structure.[148] For example, TSA is a hydroxamic acid, MGCD0103 belongs to the aminobenzamides, while Apicidin is a cyclic peptide,[148] but they all present a common mechanism to inhibit the proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts and increase the expression of anti-proliferative genes to block cardiac fibrosis.[121] Yet these different HDACIs display different efficacy and effects, which should be carefully assessed for specifically targeted processes. A study in cardiac fibroblasts demonstrated that MGCD0103 but not TSA or Apicidin paradoxically increased fibrotic-related PAI-1 expression.[121] MGCD0103 and Apicidin are highly selective inhibitors of Class I HDACs, while TSA is mainly a Class I and IIb HDAC inhibitor. The divergent effects of these HDACIs are likely due to the different complexes that are specifically engaged with HDAC1 or HDAC2 by these inhibitors.[121] Many of these HDACIs are synthetic, but there are natural HDACIs, including caffeic acid and polyphenols, which have been shown to attenuate cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis.[149,150] It is worth mentioning that some natural compounds contain Resveratrol, the Class III HDAC sirtuins activator, could ameliorate cardiac fibrosis by activating sirtuin 3 and affecting the TGF-β/SMAD3 signaling pathway.[151] HDACIs have been reported to be beneficial for cardiac fibrosis in preclinical studies. Given the multiplicity of the distinct HDACs, it is critical to identify the specific functions of each HDAC to develop more selective and targeted inhibitors. Extensive studies are needed to understand the HDAC-mediated profibrotic processes in cardiac fibrosis, as HDACs may not only associate with the acetylation process in the cells. For example, HDAC2 can be phosphorylated, and the phosphorylation of S394 on HDAC2 would induce the binding of Hsp70 and result in cardiac hypertrophy in mice.[152] Epigenetic-based therapies are still limited in the cardiovascular field; more studies are needed to explore the usage of HDACIs in cardiac fibrosis, including its safety and long-term effects.

HDACs and HDACIs in pulmonary fibrosis

Pulmonary fibrosis is another devastating disease, with IPF as the most common form. Although there are newly approved drugs mainly to relieve symptoms,[73] there is no effective treatment. In the past decade, the involvement of HDACs in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis has been documented. The activities of all Class I and II HDACs were reported to be significantly upregulated in IPF lung tissues.[103] Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that nearly all of these HDACs had a strong induction in myofibroblasts at fibroblast foci and in abnormal bronchiolar basal cells at sites of aberrant re-epithelialization in IPF but not in the control lungs.[103] Among these HDACs, HDAC4 demonstrates its importance in lung fibrosis. HDAC4 can modulate the production of ECM in lung myofibroblasts; knocking down HDAC4 attenuates α-SMA expression stimulated by TGF-β1 in normal human lung fibroblasts.[153] HDAC4 is also involved in the early stress response, while HDAC2 is increased in the middle and late stages of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in mice.[102] A study with IPF fibroblasts showed that aberrant protein phosphatase 2A/HDAC4 axis suppresses miR-29, causing a pathological increase in type I collagen expression.[154] In addition to HDAC4, HDAC6 and HDAC8 expressions are reported to be altered in IPF.[78,155] To target the dysregulated HDACs in pulmonary fibrosis, many studies used HDACIs to examine their effects in blocking the fibrotic process. Although studies involving HDACIs in pulmonary fibrosis are relatively limited compared with those in cardiac fibrosis, growing evidence highlights the antifibrotic effects of HDACIs in IPF. The most studied HDACI in IPF is SAHA, a nonselective HDAC Class I and II inhibitor. It has been reported that SAHA can inhibit the differentiation of TGF-β1-induced myofibroblasts[124]. It induces myofibroblasts apoptosis[17] and downregulates type III collagen expression on the transcriptional and translational levels.[16] SAHA also upregulates antifibrotic cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein expression and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production by posttranscriptional mechanisms.[125] Both SAHA and LBH589 (Panobinostat) have been reported to restore COX-2 expression in IPF.[125,156] In addition to SAHA, other HDACIs have also demonstrated beneficial effects in lung fibrosis studies. VPA partially inhibited TGF-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process, in which VPA blocked the decreased histone acetylation (especially H3K27 acetylation) by TGF-β1 in human alveolar epithelial cells.[126] However, in a study in paraquat-induced lung fibrosis with macrophages, VPA aggravated the acute inflammation and worsened fibrosis partially through enhanced histone acetylation at the IL-6 promoter regions.[127] On the other hand, TSA attenuated bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in mice; it restored decreased SFTPC, a gene encoding surfactant protein-C, via increased histone H4 acetylation at its promoter region in alveolar epithelial type II cells.[128] TSA upregulated the antifibrotic gene Thy-1 in rat lung fibroblasts[29]; and through inhibition of HDAC2 expression, it reduced lung fibrosis in rats.[129] Studies on selective HDACIs also presented beneficial effects in pulmonary fibrosis. Spiruchostatin A (SpA), a selective HDACI, inhibited TGF-β1-induced α-SMA, collagen I, and collagen III expression.[130] Tubastatin, an HDAC-6 inhibitor, repressed TGF-β1-induced collagen expression by diminishing Akt phosphorylation.[78] However, this study demonstrated that in bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in mice, Tubastatin-treated mice could be protected from lung fibrosis but not HDAC6 knockout mice. This indicates that Tubastatin may ameliorate lung fibrosis via an HDAC6-independent mechanism.[78] Inhibition of HDAC8 with its selective inhibitor NCC170 repressed TGF-β1-induced fibroblast–myofibroblast differentiation partially by increasing H3K27 acetylation at PPAR-γ enhancer regions to upregulate PPAR-γ mRNA, an antifibrotic molecule.[131] This inhibitor also ameliorated bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in mice.[131] In addition to blocking the well-documented increased α-SMA and collagen expression in myofibroblasts, HDACIs have been reported to induce apoptosis by altering the apoptosis-related gene expression and subsequently alleviating fibrosis,[17,103,132] as increased apoptosis resistance is a major characteristic of IPF myofibroblasts.[157] SAHA induces apoptosis in IPF primary fibroblasts, at least in part, by regulating apoptosis-related genes through epigenetic mechanisms.[17] Other HDACIs, LBH589 or VPA, considerably reduced the genes associated with the profibrotic and apoptosis-resistant phenotype in IPF fibroblasts.[103] Fibrotic fibroblasts with decreased Fas expression and increased resistance to Fas-mediated apoptosis are associated with increased HDAC 2 and 4; and TSA or SAHA can increase Fas expression in these cells and restore susceptibility to Fas-induced apoptosis.[132] Pirfenidone is the first anti-fibrotic agent for IPF to slow its progression, a recent study compared the antifibrotic efficacy of Panobinostat and Pirfenidone in IPF fibroblasts, and concluded that both have antifibrotic effects, but Panobinostat also induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and thus was more efficient in inactivating IPF fibroblasts.[158] HDACIs are powerful epigenetic regulators, and epigenetic mechanisms are involved in pulmonary fibrosis.[75] Many epigenetic factors that are affected by environmental changes,[159] including metabolic alterations[160] and aging,[161] contribute to pulmonary fibrosis. Histone modifications, especially histone acetylation, are only part of this complexed process. Inhibition of HDAC at in vitro and in vivo models of pulmonary fibrosis has shown promising results, but progress in determining the biological mechanisms and therapeutic options remains obscure. More in-depth studies in this area will empower us to develop better-targeted therapeutic methods to treat this fatal disease.

Limitations and side effects of HDACIs

HDACIs represent a new class of epigenetic drugs that have demonstrated promising results in preclinical studies. Histone and nonhistone proteins are the targets of HDACs, many of which are critical regulators of vital pathways.[25] Even the same HDAC may have different roles at different stages of the same disease. For example, HDAC1 was reported to be oncosuppressive in the early stage while oncogenic in established tumor cells in a mouse tumor model.[162] The inhibitors, even selective inhibitors of HDAC, could have many off-target effects. Undesired toxicity of certain HDACIs could lead to dysfunction of other important biological processes. For instance, selective Class I HDACIs showed potent anti-tumor effects, but inhibition of Class I HDACs, specifically HDAC3, caused impaired DNA damage response.[163] Other major concerns include the cardiac toxicity by some HDACIs,[164] and the cellular resistance to certain HDACIs.[165] A study in phase I and II clinical trials of romidepsin in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, de novo resistance of the drug was found.[165] The lack of response-predictive markers for cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis also delayed advances in establishing the valuable index for therapeutic efficacy. To overcome these limitations and side effects, a better designed, more selective, and better targeted HDACI would increase the potency against fibrotic diseases. For pulmonary fibrosis, localized administration of the drug (such as nasal delivery) would minimize the undesired whole-body side effects.

Conclusion

Studies in the past have shown that HDACs are critical in the pathogenesis of fibrosis by modulating acetylation of histone and nonhistone substrates. HDACs are found to be dysregulated in fibrotic diseases. Inhibition of HDACs in fibrotic models mitigates fibrotic status. HDACIs, especially selective inhibitors, would offer better understanding of how HDACs participate in the process of fibrogenesis. Inhibitors of HDACs would offer a novel category of therapeutic options in fibrosis. Extensive studies are needed to clarify the specific roles of each HDAC in the fibrotic process, which would form a mechanistic foundation for clinical usage. Many of the current HDACIs in clinical trials are broad-spectrum nonselective inhibitors and have more toxicity and unwanted side effects than selective HDACIs. Right now, most HDACIs either approved by the FDA or in clinical trials are mainly for cancer treatments. HDACIs for cardiac or pulmonary fibrosis are still mostly in preclinical stages. Better targeted, more specific HDACIs are needed to enhance the therapeutic efficacy and reduce toxicity. Furthermore, it is crucial to develop biomarkers for HDACI alone or in combination with other reagents to predict the response of individual patient to treatment. Elucidation and validation of the mechanisms of HDAC involved in the pathogenesis of fibrosis would provide a powerful tool in the treatment of fibrotic-related diseases, especially cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis.
  163 in total

Review 1.  Histone acetylation in gene regulation.

Authors:  Loredana Verdone; Eleonora Agricola; Micaela Caserta; Ernesto Di Mauro
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2006-07-28

2.  Histone deacetylase inhibition attenuates cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis through acetylation of mineralocorticoid receptor in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Seol-Hee Kang; Young Mi Seok; Min-ji Song; Hae-Ahm Lee; Thomas Kurz; InKyeom Kim
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 3.  Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Modulating Non-epigenetic Players: The Novel Mechanism for Small Molecule Based Therapeutic Intervention.

Authors:  Shabir Ahmad Ganai
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.465

Review 4.  HDACs and HDAC Inhibitors in Cancer Development and Therapy.

Authors:  Yixuan Li; Edward Seto
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  Targeting TGF-β signaling for the treatment of fibrosis.

Authors:  Andrea Hermina Györfi; Alexandru-Emil Matei; Jörg H W Distler
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 11.583

6.  Cardiac HDAC6 catalytic activity is induced in response to chronic hypertension.

Authors:  Douglas D Lemon; Todd R Horn; Maria A Cavasin; Mark Y Jeong; Kurt W Haubold; Carlin S Long; David C Irwin; Sylvia A McCune; Eunhee Chung; Leslie A Leinwand; Timothy A McKinsey
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 5.000

7.  Intrinsic ubiquitination activity of PCAF controls the stability of the oncoprotein Hdm2.

Authors:  Laëtitia K Linares; Rosemary Kiernan; Robinson Triboulet; Christine Chable-Bessia; Daniel Latreille; Olivier Cuvier; Matthieu Lacroix; Laurent Le Cam; Olivier Coux; Monsef Benkirane
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-02-11       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  HDAC8 inhibition ameliorates pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Shigeki Saito; Yan Zhuang; Takayoshi Suzuki; Yosuke Ota; Marjorie E Bateman; Ala L Alkhatib; Gilbert F Morris; Joseph A Lasky
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.464

9.  Transgenic overexpression of active HDAC4 in the heart attenuates cardiac function and exacerbates remodeling in infarcted myocardium.

Authors:  Ling X Zhang; Jianfeng Du; Yu Tina Zhao; Jianguo Wang; Shouyan Zhang; Patrycja M Dubielecka; Lei Wei; Shougang Zhuang; Gangjian Qin; Y Eugene Chin; Ting C Zhao
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-10-04

10.  Phase I/II study of the deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk MDS or AML (PANOBEST trial).

Authors:  G Bug; A Burchert; E-M Wagner; N Kröger; T Berg; S Güller; S K Metzelder; A Wolf; S Hünecke; P Bader; J Schetelig; H Serve; O G Ottmann
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac Complications: The Understudied Aspect of Cancer Cachexia.

Authors:  Vivek Bora; Bhoomika Patel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Kasugamycin Is a Novel Chitinase 1 Inhibitor with Strong Antifibrotic Effects on Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Chang-Min Lee; Joyce H Lee; Mun-Ock Kim; Jin Wook Park; Suchitra Kamle; Bedia Akosman; Erica L Herzog; Xue Yan Peng; Jack A Elias; Chun Geun Lee
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 7.748

3.  Romidepsin (FK228) improves the survival of allogeneic skin grafts through downregulating the production of donor-specific antibody via suppressing the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway.

Authors:  Yuliang Guo; Siyu Song; Xiaoxiao DU; Li Tian; Man Zhang; Hongmin Zhou; Zhonghua Klaus Chen; Sheng Chang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 5.552

4.  MeCP2 epigenetically regulates alpha-smooth muscle actin in human lung fibroblasts.

Authors:  Zheyi Xiang; Qingxian Zhou; Min Hu; Yan Y Sanders
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.429

5.  Brd4-p300 inhibition downregulates Nox4 and accelerates lung fibrosis resolution in aged mice.

Authors:  Yan Y Sanders; Xing Lyv; Q Jennifer Zhou; Zheyi Xiang; Denise Stanford; Sandeep Bodduluri; Steven M Rowe; Victor J Thannickal
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 6.  Application of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Renal Interstitial Fibrosis.

Authors:  Ling Nie; Yong Liu; Bo Zhang; Jinghong Zhao
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-26

7.  Nuclear mechanosensing drives chromatin remodelling in persistently activated fibroblasts.

Authors:  Cierra J Walker; Claudia Crocini; Daniel Ramirez; Anouk R Killaars; Joseph C Grim; Brian A Aguado; Kyle Clark; Mary A Allen; Robin D Dowell; Leslie A Leinwand; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 29.234

8.  BAL Transcriptomes Characterize Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Endotypes With Prognostic Impact.

Authors:  Laurens J De Sadeleer; Stijn E Verleden; Jonas C Schupp; John E McDonough; Tinne Goos; Jonas Yserbyt; Elena Bargagli; Paola Rottoli; Naftali Kaminski; Antje Prasse; Wim A Wuyts
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 10.262

9.  HDAC Inhibitor Abrogates LTA-Induced PAI-1 Expression in Pleural Mesothelial Cells and Attenuates Experimental Pleural Fibrosis.

Authors:  Wei-Lin Chen; Mei-Chuan Chen; Shang-Fu Hsu; Shih-Hsin Hsiao; Chi-Li Chung
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Harnessing the Role of HDAC6 in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Design, Synthesis, Structural Analysis, and Biological Evaluation of Potent Inhibitors.

Authors:  Giuseppe Campiani; Caterina Cavella; Jeremy D Osko; Margherita Brindisi; Nicola Relitti; Simone Brogi; A Prasanth Saraswati; Stefano Federico; Giulia Chemi; Samuele Maramai; Gabriele Carullo; Benedikt Jaeger; Alfonso Carleo; Rosaria Benedetti; Federica Sarno; Stefania Lamponi; Paola Rottoli; Elena Bargagli; Carlo Bertucci; Daniele Tedesco; Daniel Herp; Johanna Senger; Giovina Ruberti; Fulvio Saccoccia; Simona Saponara; Beatrice Gorelli; Massimo Valoti; Breándan Kennedy; Husvinee Sundaramurthi; Stefania Butini; Manfred Jung; Katy M Roach; Lucia Altucci; Peter Bradding; David W Christianson; Sandra Gemma; Antje Prasse
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 8.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.