Cardiac fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis.

Cardiac fibrosis is defined as the imbalance of extracellular matrix (ECM) production and degradation, thus contributing to cardiac dysfunction in many cardiac pathophysiologic conditions. This review discusses specific markers and origin of cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), and the underlying mechanism involved in the development of cardiac fibrosis. Currently, there are no CFs-specific molecular markers. Most studies use co-labelling with panels of antibodies that can recognize CFs. Origin of fibroblasts is heterogeneous. After fibrotic stimuli, the levels of myocardial pro-fibrotic growth factors and cytokines are increased. These pro-fibrotic growth factors and cytokines bind to its receptors and then trigger the activation of signaling pathway and transcriptional factors via Smad-dependent or Smad independent-manners. These fibrosis-related transcriptional factors regulate gene expression that are involved in the fibrosis to amplify the fibrotic response. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for initiation, progression, and amplification of cardiac fibrosis are of great clinical significance to find drugs that can prevent the progression of cardiac fibrosis.

Introduction

Cardiac fibrosis, characterized by the imbalance of extracellular matrix (ECM) production and degradation, which results in the accumulation of scar tissue, is closely associated with cardiac and endocrine diseases 1. Irrespective of the initial cause, injury to the heart evokes sustained fibrotic response that results in distorted heart architecture and cardiac dysfunction. Cardiac fibrosis increases stiffness of left ventricle, and impedes contraction and relaxation of hearts. Cardiac fibrosis also impairs mechano-electric coupling, thus leading to arrhythmias 2,3. Growth factors secreted by myofibroblasts directly induce hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes via a paracrine dependent-manner 4, which is another landmark of heart failure. The deposition of collagen and hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes lead to a relatively decreased capillary density, further promoting cardiac remodeling 5. Currently, no evidence-based therapies show significant efficacy in cardiac fibrosis. The main reason is the underlying basis of fibrosis is still unclear. In this article, we aimed to provide a concise review of advances in pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis.

Marker proteins and origin of fibroblasts

So far, there are no cardiac fibroblasts (CFs)-specific molecular markers. Most previous findings are obtained using co-labelling with panels of antibodies that can recognize CFs. We summarized the markers of CFs in Figure 1. Vimentin, a constituent of the intermediate-filament family of proteins, has been extensively studied as a marker of CFs. Vimentin has been used to identify the purity of isolated CFs in vitro. It can label CFs with high sensitivity, however, it also is expressed by endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells 6. Upon stimuli, interstitial fibroblasts would express α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), a sign of fibroblasts activation 7. Therefore, α-SMA is used to identify CFs. As α-SMA is also expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells 8, antibody-based strategy to detect this protein is difficult to interpret. S100A4, which is also known as fibroblast-specific protein 1 (FSP1), is specific for fibroblasts in the heart 9. However, a study reported that FSP1-positive cells were just a small subset of CFs, most of FSP1-postive cells in interstitial fibrotic areas were CD45+ leukocytes 10. Similar to FSP1, immunostaining of discoidin domain receptor (DDR) 2, a tyrosine kinase receptor, can only label a small part (about 27% as reported) of fibroblasts in the heart 11,12. Periostin is a secreted protein and closely involved in cell adhesion. It has been reported that periostin specifically was expressed by all newly activated fibroblasts (myofibroblasts) upon heart injury without ectopic expression in other cardiac cell types 13. However, the majority of periostin is secreted and deposited extracellularly, only a small proportion can be observed in intracellular (Figure 1) 13. This fact restricts its utility in study fibroblasts 14. Identification specific markers of CFs are of great importance to understand the mechanisms of cardiac fibrosis.

Figure 1

Schematic displaying the serviceable fibroblast markers. Vimentin is a constituent of the intermediate-filament family of proteins and used to identify the purity of isolated cardiac fibroblasts in vitro. Upon stimuli, interstitial fibroblasts would express α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), a sign of fibroblasts activation. Fibroblast-specific protein 1 (FSP1) is also specific for fibroblasts in the heart. Domain receptor (DDR) 2, a membrane tyrosine kinase receptor, can label a part of fibroblasts in the heart. Periostin is a secreted protein and specifically expressed by all newly activated fibroblasts (myofibroblasts) upon heart injury without ectopic expression in other cardiac cell types.

Another significant issue in studying fibroblasts is heterogeneous origins of fibroblasts. We summarized the origin of CFs in Figure 2. The traditional attitude held is that cardiac fibrosis is the result of proliferation and activation of resident fibroblasts, which is supported by the study that transforming growth factor (TGF)-β induced the proliferation and activation of isolated fibroblasts 15. Further study using a transgenic collagen1α1-GFP reporter mice provided more evidence. Moore-Morris et al found that pressure overload resulted in activation and proliferation of these resident lineages 10. This notion has been challenged by the following findings: fibroblasts rapidly transformed into myofibroblasts even without stimuli in vitro experiment; and proliferating fibroblast-like cells only existed in the vicinity of the vessels 16,17. In addition to the activation of resident CFs, epithelial cells also contributed to the total pool of CFs through an endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT)18,19. In this study, the authors used Tie1 to identify endothelial cells and used FSP1 to label CFs, and found that 27% to 35% of all (α-SMA+ or FSP1+) fibroblasts were generated from endothelial cells 18,19. However, Tie1 could label both endothelial and immune lineages. Indeed, other genetic fate mapping studies using different endothelial-specific markers, for example fetal liver kinase 1 (Flk1) or VE-Cadherin, showed limited contribution of endothelial to total pool of CFs in the normal heart 20,21. The contribution of EndMT to cardiac fibrosis need to be further clarified. The epicardium-derived fibroblasts have been summarized by a review 22. Zhou et al. further found that epicardium-derived cells migrated into the region of the forming annulus fibrosis using Cre-LoxP technology in the normal mammalian hearts 23. Epicardium-derived cells occurred in ischemic hearts, but was less apparent in hypertensive heart disease 24. In the damaged hearts, activation of the epicardium and cardiac fibroblasts by Wnt1/β-catenin promoted cardiac repair 25. Cardiac fibroblasts also originate from the bone marrow. One study reported that bone marrow-derived cells constituted up to 24% of all myofibroblasts in the infarct hearts 26. However, this view has been challenged by another study in which the authors used Vav-Cre labeled over 95% of CD45+ immune cells in hearts, and did not show any contribution from bone marrow during pressure overload 27. Further fate-mapping studies focusing on the contribution of bone marrow-derived CFs would be of interest.

Figure 2

Origins of cardiac fibroblasts. Schematic demonstrates the origins of fibroblasts in the heart. Normal heart only has resident fibroblasts. Upon stimuli, resident fibroblasts proliferates. Endothelial cells, bone marrow cells and epicardium contribute to the total pool of fibroblasts. In response to stimuli, cardiomyocytes become hypertrophy and muscle fibers become disarranged.

The mechanisms of cardiac fibrosis

Briefly, the fibrotic response can be divided into three phases: the initiating phase, the effective phase and amplificative phase. After stimuli, the levels of circulating and myocardial pro-fibrotic growth factors and cytokines are increased, triggering the fibrotic response 28. In the effective phase, this pro-fibrotic growth factors and cytokines bind to their receptors and then trigger the activation of signaling pathway and transcriptional factors including Smad, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), protein kinase B (PKB, also called AKT) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB). These pathological activations lead to the transformation of CFs into myofibroblasts, which would express the highly contractile protein α-SMA and produce a number of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) to regulate homeostasis of ECM. Moreover, these pro-fibrotic transcriptional factors regulate the synthesis and secretion of pro-fibrotic growth factors and cytokines in CFs. The secreted growth factors and cytokines by CFs or other cells, for example, cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells and inflammatory cells, can function on CFs or cardiomyocytes, forming a positive feedback and eventually amplify the fibrotic response 28,29.

The pro-fibrotic growth factors and cytokines

TGF-β

Up to mow, TGF-β is the best-known fibrogenic growth factor during cardiac fibrosis. TGF-β exists in 3 isoforms (TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3) in mammals, which are encoded by 3 different genes 30,31, among which TGF-β1 is the predominant form. Previous studies in humans and experimental models have shown increased TGF-β expression during cardiac fibrosis 32,33. Increased TGF-β binds to TGF-β receptor I (TβRI, also called ALK5) and the type II receptor TβRII to activate Smad2/3 pathway, thus promoting the process of cardiac fibrosis 34,35. TGF-β is a pleiotropic mediator with potent and diverse effects on many cell types involved in cardiac fibrosis (Figure 3). TGF-β could induce the transformation from fibroblasts to myofibroblasts 36, and increase ECM gene expression, thus promoting ECM deposition. TGF-β also inhibited degradation of ECM by regulating the level of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 and TIMPs 37. In addition, TGF-β was also involved in the synthesis and secretion of other profibrotic cytokines 38. TGF-β receptors were expressed in almost all the inflammatory cells subsets, therefore TGF-β also had profound effects on inflammatory cells. TGF-β bidirectionally regulated function of macrophage depending on the cytokine microenvironment, differentiation status and the tissue origin of the cells. Intradermal or intraarticular injection of TGF-β induced monocyte infiltration and matrix deposition 39.TGF-β mediated monocytes adhesion via enhancing the expression of specific integrin 40. In addition, TGF-β stimulated monocytes to secret a variety of profibrotic cytokines 41,42. Inconsistent with these studies, TGF-β could suppress pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines synthesis 43. TGF-β suppressed T cell proliferation by inhibiting interleukin (IL)-2 production 44,45. TGF-β1 inhibited the T helper type 1 differentiation, which has been found to be profibrotic in our recent study using T-bet deficiency rat 46,47. In addition, TGF-β also induced migration of mast cell 48. Beyond its effects on inflammatory cells, TGF-β also controlled cardiomyocyte phenotype. TGF-β stimulation resulted in the hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes 49,50. The precise role of TGF-β in endothelial cells and angiogenesis has proved to be dual, dependent on contextual and environmental cues 51,52. We previously demonstrated that TGF-β1 induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition of human umbilical vein endothelial cells 53. Heterozygous TGF- β1 deficient mice showed decreased age-associated myocardial fibrosis and improved cardiac compliance, indicating endogenous TGF-β may be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis 54. Conversely, mice with TGF-β1 overexpression had significant ventricular fibrosis, with an increase in the fractional area of cardiac fibroblasts 55. An orally available TGF-β receptor antagonist (NP-40208) attenuated myocardial fibrosis in mice with cardiac-restricted overexpression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) 56. Inconsistent with these studies, transgenic mice that carrying a mutated human TGF-β1 under the control of α-myosin heavy chain (MHC) promoter had a marked increase in active TGF-β1 levels in adult hearts and overt fibrosis only in the atria, implying that increased TGF-β1 activity by itself is insufficient to promote ventricular fibrosis in the adult mouse 57. Of note, inhibition of TGF-β signaling via dominant negative mutation of the TGF-β type II receptor attenuated pressure overload-induced interstitial fibrosis, but promoted cardiac dysfunction 58, implying double-faced role of TGF-β in cardiac remodeling. These findings suggested that sustained and excessive TGF-β activation may be deleterious, whereas, a baseline level of TGF-β signaling or an early-responsive increase of TGF-β may protect the hearts from the acute injury.

Figure 3

Fibrotic signaling mechanisms between different cardiac populations. Fibrosis can be augmented by proinflammatory cytokines and profibrotic and molecules. Angiotensin II, Ang II; AT1, angiotensin II type 1; extracellular matrix, ECM; interleukin, IL; transforming growth factor-β, TGF-β; TGF-β receptor, TβR.

Angiotensin II (Ang II)

Ang II is a critical mediator of cardiac fibrosis (Figure 3). Ang II acts through 2 specific receptors: angiotensin type (AT) 1 and AT2. Elevated Ang II level was found in hypertrophic hearts with fibrosis. Both AT1 and AT2 have been shown to be increased during the process of cardiac fibrosis 59,60. AT1 stimulation promoted the activation of profibrotic downstream effects, whereas activation of AT2 counteracted the profibrotic effects of AT1 61,62. Ang II enhanced human CFs growth, increased the secretion of TGF-β1, PAI-1 and ECM, and promoted CFs adhesion 63. Ang II also induced the hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes, and enhanced the secretion of profibrotic growth factor by myocytes 64,65. Ang II induced activation of inflammatory cells via direct chemotaxis and production of proinflammatory cytokine 66. Study in vitro demonstrated that Ang II increased leukocyte adhesion to the endothelium 67. The profibrotic effects of Ang II were confirmed by a number of studies. De Mello et al. found that chronic blockade of AT1 reduced fibrosis in the failing heart via increasing cell-to-cell communication 68. Ang II blockade reversed cardiac fibrosis in a human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy model using transgenic mouse model without affecting myocyte disarray 69. Losartan, an Ang II receptor antagonist decreased myocardial fibrosis in patients with end-stage renal disease 70. Ang II-induced fibrotic response was mediated by TGF-β. Providing a support for this notion, a study reported Ang II was not able to induce cardiac fibrosis in vivo in TGF-β1-deficient mice, indicating that Ang II may not directly induce cardiac fibrosis in vivo, but indirectly promoting secretion of growth factors, which subsequently function on CFs in autocrine or paracrine dependent manners71.

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF)

CTGF, a cysteine-rich 36-38 kDa secreted protein, belongs to the CCN family and is also referred to as CCN2. Though CTGF is abundantly expressed in the fetal myocardium, its expression is restricted to the atria and large blood vessels in the adult heart 72,73. Increased expression of CTGF were detected in the infarcted hearts 74. Increased CTGF levels were observed in cardiac samples obtained from patients with heart failure and the CTGF-stained area correlated with myocardial fibrosis area 75. In addition, as an immediate early gene, CTGF expression could be induced by TGF-β and Ang II in CFs and cardiomyocytes 76. Though accumulating evidence demonstrated that CTGF induced the proliferation of fibroblasts, promoted the transformation from CFs to myofibroblasts and increased ECM production 77-80, CTGF is considered to have limited capacity to induce cardiac fibrosis. CTGF was to create a fibrotic environment and modulated the activity of growth factors in the ECM 81. Providing evidence for this notion, cardiac-specific overexpression CTGF using myosin light chain-2 promoter did not induce cardiac fibrosis in murine or rat hearts 82. Moreover, transgenic mice overexpressing CTGF had similar amount of fibrosis after cardiac injury compared to control mice 82-84. Consistent with these findings, Fontes et al. found that CTGF global knockout does not affect cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis induced by chronic pressure overload 85. However, there sounds quite a different voice that CTGF cardiac transgenic mice showed significantly increased fibrosis in response to pressure overload 86. For the sake of deciphering the role of CTGF, It would be certainly interesting to manipulate the expression of CTGF specifically in CFs.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1)

ET-1, a protein secreted from endothelial cells, has been shown to play a key role in cardiac remodeling. ET-1 binds to ET receptor A (ETA) and ETB to act a powerful vasoconstrictor. ET-1 could induce cardiac fibroblast proliferation, enhances types I and III collagen synthesis, resulting in myofibroblast differentiation 87,88. ET-1 was also involved in the fibrotic responses of TGF-β 89. The role of ET-1 in cardiac fibrosis was evident by a study that an ETA receptor antagonist, BQ123, blocked the collagen synthesis response in cardiac fibroblasts induced by TGF-β 90.

Inflammatory cytokine

Upon cardiac injury, the inflammatory signaling molecules immediately increased. The inflammatory factors could be released by inflammatory cells, CFs or even cardiomyocytes 91. The levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β correlated with disease severity in patients with heart failure 92. The role of TNF-α in cardiac fibrosis were confirmed by a study reported that TNF-α global knockout mice showed attenuated inflammatory response and cardiac fibrosis induced by pressure overload 93. Conversely, cardiac-restricted overexpression of TNF-α induced cardiac fibrosis, eventually resulting in dilated cardiomyopathy 94. Unexpectedly, TNF-α inhibition in clinical studies had no benefit in patients with HF 95. Previous studies also demonstrated a controversial of role IL-1β in cardiac fibrosis. IL-1β could promote rat CFs migration 96. Inconsistent with this study, IL-1β inhibited myofibroblast differentiation induced by TGF-β 97. This observation was also supported by a study in vivo using mice with IL-1β deficiency. This study found that mice with IL-1β deficiency had reduced cardiac dysfunction, but exacerbated cardiac fibrosis 98. However, the dispute is going to be settled by a clinical trial, in which the improvement in left ventricular function was observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after inhibition of IL-1 99. Current studies also demonstrated a pleiotropic role of IL-6 in cardiac fibrosis. IL-6 alone resulted in cardiac fibrosis 100. In agreement with this view, Ma et al. reported that IL-6 produced by CFs that activated by macrophage is essential for Ang II-induced cardiac fibrosis 101. Another study also supported the notion that IL-6 had a detrimental role during cardiac fibrosis, using IL-6 knockout mice the author found that genetic deletion of IL-6 attenuated myocardial fibrosis 102. Contrary to the notion that IL-6 induced cardiac fibrosis, Lai and colleagues reported that IL-6 deficiency was not sufficient to attenuate cardiac fibrosis 103, and loss of IL-6 led to cardiac dysfunction via altering the ECM and blocking critical cell-cell interactions 104. IL-6 may exert different biological functions during the different phase of cardiac fibrosis, therefore further exploration is still needed. Extensive evidence also implicates chemokines in the pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis. Anti-monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) gene therapy attenuated interstitial fibrosis after myocardial infarction 105. Absence of MCP-1 resulted in attenuated myofibroblasts accumulation and improved cardiac function 106. Interestingly, cardiac overexpression of MCP-1 resulted in α-SMA-positive myofibroblasts at 14 days after myocardial infarction, and prevented cardiac dysfunction 107. These inconsistent results indicated a bidirectional role of MCP-1 in cardiac fibrosis.

Signaling pathway involved in cardiac fibrosis

Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathway

TGF-β binds to the type II receptor, which can phosphorylate the type I receptor. Phosphorylation of type I receptor leads to the recruitment and activation of receptor-regulated Smads (mainly Smad2 and Smad3). Smad2 and Smad3 are released from the receptors and bind to Smad4 to form a heterotrimeric complex. This complex translocates into nucleus and recruits the related coactivators CREB-binding protein or p300 to regulate the transcription of target genes (Figure 4). Smad6 and Smad7 are inhibitory Smads, which can interact with type I receptor and competitively inhibit transcription of Smad2 and Smad3. Smad6 and Smad7 also promote degradation of active type I receptors.

Figure 4

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathway through Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways. TGF-β induced the translocation of Smad2 and Smad3 complex into nucleus to amplify the fibrotic response. Apart from this, MAPK, AKT and AMPK were also activated during fibrotic response.

The essential role of Smad3 in fibrotic remodeling has been confirmed by a study using Smad3-null mice. Bujak and the colleagues found that mice with Smad3 deficiency had reduced fibrotic remodeling after myocardial infarction. Unexpectedly, increased myofibroblast density was observed in Smad3 knockout mice due to the abrogation of Smad3-dependent antiproliferative effects on CFs 28,108. In some cases, TGF-β-mediated signaling pathway could be rapidly activated, implying that this activation was not the result of Smad-dependent transcription response 109. TGF-β also activated other signaling cascades, including MAPKs (Figure 4). Activation of MAPKs after TGF-β treatment even in Smad4-deficient cells, or cell with dominant-negative Smads, implying that the activation of MAPKs was not Smads-dependent 110. The activated type II receptor resulted in the activation of TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), which then acted on MKK3/6 or MKK4 and led to the phosphorylation of JNK or p38, respectively 111. Zhang et al. found that cardiomyocytes-specific overexpression of TAK1 resulted in myocyte disorganization and interstitial fibrosis 112. The profibrotic effect of p38 was supported by a study found that transgenic mice with cardiac-specific expression of dominant negative forms of p38α and p38β were resistant to cardiac fibrosis in response to pressure overload 113. Using inducible periostin knock-in Cre mice, Molkentin et al found that fibroblast-specific genetic depletion of p38 blocked CFs differentiation into myofibroblasts and reduced fibrosis in response to ischemic injury through the transcription factor serum-response factor (SRF) and the signaling effector calcineurin 114. TGF-β also induced the activation of extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) via the small GTPase Ras or direct phosphorylation of ShcA 115. Recent study also found that nonmyocyte ERK signaling promoted load-induced cardiac fibrosis in Marfan mice 116. MAPKs also took in charge of the activation of TGF-β-Smads axis. ERK and JNK pathways could result in Smads phosphorylation 117,118. TGF-β-induced activation of ERK resulted in the elevated expression of TGF-β, thereby amplifying the TGF-β response. Activation of p38 and JNK resulted in the activation of activating transcriptional factor 2 (ATF2), which is a Smad-interacting transcription factor 109.

AKT was also the downstream of TGF-β signaling pathway (Figure 4). TGF-β activated AKT pathway via a RhoA-dependent manner, and inhibition of AKT reduced Smad2 phosphorylation and transcription, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transdifferentiation. Consistent with this, we also found that inhibition of AKT by piperine or leflunomide could suppress pressure overload or isoprenaline (ISO)-induced cardiac fibrosis 15,119. Using two fibroblast-specific knockout mouse models, Lal et al found that CFs-specific deletion of glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) β, a downstream of AKT, in CFs resulted in fibrogenesis, cardiac fibrosis and excessive scarring in the ischemic heart 120. This study also showed that GSK-3β inhibited pro-fibrotic TGF-β-Smad3 signaling via interaction with Smad3.

AMP-activated protein kinase α (AMPKα) signaling pathway

AMPKα signaling pathway is also closely involved in the process of cardiac fibrosis. AMPKα could be activated by many profibrotic conditions, such as pressure overload, ischemia, TGF-β, Ang II and ISO. AMPKα also regulated signaling pathways that has been demonstrated to regulate fibrotic response. AMPKα attenuated cardiac fibrosis via a cross-talk with ERK in CFs 121. AMPK inhibited TGF-β-induced Smad3-dependent transcription 122. The results in our lab demonstrated that activation of AMPKα led to a decrease in the activation of ERK and p70 during fibrotic response 123. AMPKα also phosphorylated β-catenin in mesenchymal stem cells 124, loss of which in resident cardiac fibroblasts attenuated cardiac fibrosis induced by pressure overload in mice 125. The importance of AMPKα in the regulation of cardiac fibrosis has been confirmed using AMPKα knockout mice showing that deletion of AMPKα2 promoted fibrosis and decreased cardiac function 126. Consistent with this, we also found that activation of AMPKα2 could protect pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis 123,127. However, there sounds a quite opposite voice that AMPKα1, not AMPKα2, was involved in the process of cardiac fibrosis due to the reason that CFs mainly express the AMPKα1 catalytic isoform. This view was supported by the studies that AMPKα1 deficiency did not affect capillary density or inflammation in the infarcted myocardium but changed the fibrotic properties of CFs 128. However, one fact cannot be ignored that the evidence that supporting the profibrotic effect of AMPKα is only circumstantial. Almost all the studies using pharmacological drugs, which could activate AMPKα combined with off-target effects. Fibroblast-specific manipulation of AMPKα catalytic isoform could end this question.

Wnt signaling

Wnt signaling controls the proliferation, differentiation and and migration of cells. The most understood Wnt-mediated signaling cascade is the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway. In the absence of Wnt ligands, cytosolic β-catenin is degraded by the destruction complex, which is composed of GSK-3β, the scaffolding proteins adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and casein kinase (CK)-1α. Upon binding of Wnt proteins to Frizzled (Fz) receptor and lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6) coreceptor, cytoplasmic β-catenin is stabilized. β-Catenin then enters the nucleus and interacts with T-cell factor (TCF) to regulate Wnt-related genes 129-131. The non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways act independently of β-catenin and LRP-5/6 and activate protein kinase C (PKC), calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CamKII) or calcineurin (CaN). The binding of a Wnt ligand resulted in the activation of Frizzled and Dishevelled, leading to activation of Rho/ROCK and Rac/JNK 132. Several publications have indicated a crucial role for Wnt signaling in the development of cardiac fibrosis. Previous study revealed an association between canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling and epicardial fibrosis of failed pediatric heart allografts with diastolic dysfunction 133. Upon cardiac injury, the epicardium was activated in a Wnt-dependent manner, and underwent epithelial-mesenchymal transition to generate CFs 134. Disruption of downstream Wnt signaling in epicardial cells decreased epicardial expansion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and resulted in cardiac dysfunction and ventricular dilatation 135. Wnt signaling pathway was also closely associated with the proliferation and transformation of CFs. Wnt 1 could induce CFs to proliferate and express pro-fibrotic genes 25. Chronic activation of Wnt signaling induced transformation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts and contributed to cardiac fibrosis in the aged heart 129. Secreted Frizzled-related proteins (sFRPs) have emerged as key regulators of fibrotic response. CFs lacking endogenous sFRP-1 showed increased α-SMA, higher proliferation ability, and increased collagen accumulation 136. sFRP2 is one of the best-known inhibitor of Wnt signaling. sFRP2 could inhibit cardiac fibrosis and improve cardiac function in infarcted hearts 137. Lal et al. suggested a key role of GSK-3β in the process of fibrotic response. Lal and his colleagues achieved CF-specific deletion of GSK-3β by employing periostin-Cre mice and tamoxifen-inducible Col1α2-cre mice. Lal and his colleagues found that deletion of GSK-3β resulted in hyperactivation of pro-fibrotic TGF-β-Smad-3 signaling which causes excessive fibrosis 120. Mechanistically, they found GSK-3β could interact with Smad-3. Recently, the role of β-catenin in resident and activated CFs after cardiac pressure overload were also examined. Pressure overload resulted in increased β-catenin signaling in CFs, and fibroblast-specific loss of β-catenin led to improved cardiac function, reduced interstitial fibrosis and decreased expression of fibrotic ECM protein genes via directly regulating the gene expression of Col1α1, Col3α1, and periostin 125.

Transcription factors activated in the fibrosis

Smad

After TGF-β binds to its ligand, activated TGF-β receptor phosphorylates Smad2 and Smad3, which interact with Smad4, resulting in the translocation into the nucleus to control the level of targeted genes. To precisely control the transcription, Smad associated with coactivators and corepressors. The coactiavtors included CBP/p300, SMIF, MSG1 and ARC105. The corepressors currently found were c-Ski, cMyc, ATF3, SNIP1, SIP1, Tob. Smad complexes bind to specific DNA sequences in the promoters or enhancers of target genes. The Smad binding element (SBE), which binds Smad complexes via MH1 domains, was first identified in the PAI-1 promoter 138,139. The DNA binding site of Smad is defined as the sequence 5′-AGAc-3′ or its reverse complement 5′-GTcT-3′140. This short SBE only allow low-affinity binding, and interaction with coactivators and corepressors is required for the specific recruitment of Smads to response elements 141. The targeted genes of Smad complex included PAI-1, junB 142, collagen 3 143.

Peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) signaling pathway

PPAR-γ was also closely involved in many fibrotic responses, including hypertension, atherosclerosis, HF, diabetic cardiomyopathy. A PPAR-γ agonist significantly reduced the expression of TGF-β 144. PPAR-γ agonists inhibited TGF-β-driven myofibroblasts differentiation and collagen I protein production 145. Activation of PPAR-γ negatively regulated the activities of other fibrosis-related transcription factors, such as activated protein-1 (AP-1), NF-κB, nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) or signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) via a ligand-dependent manner 146. Treatment with the PPAR-γ activators resulted in the reduction of ECM deposition and cardiac fibrosis 147,148. Consistent with these studies, we also found that pioglitazone reduced pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis 149. However, there was a different voice that pioglitazone inhibited pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling even in heterozygous PPAR-γ-deficient mice, suggesting that pioglitazone inhibited fibrotic response was not dependent on PPAR-γ 150. In addition, Duan et al found that rosiglitazone causes cardiac hypertrophy at least partially independent of PPAR-γ in cardiomyocytes 151. Later studies demonstrated that the side effects of thiazolidinedione are largely attributed to its high affinity for PPAR-γ and overactivation of the PPAR-γ pathway 152,153. Therefore, drugs that can activated moderately PPAR-γ would be of great significance. In our previous study, we found that piperine could reduce pressure overload or ISO-caused cardiac fibrosis without any side effect via modestly activating PPAR-γ 154.

Activating protein-1 (AP-1)

AP-1 proteins are homodimers and heterodimers composed of basic region-leucine zipper (bZIP) proteins, which were composed of Jun, Fos, and Jun dimerization partners and activating transcription factors 155. Pressure overload, Ang II, and hypoxia could activate AP-1 in CFs 156,157. Potential AP-1 binding sites have been identified in many signaling molecules that were closely associated with fibrosis, including transcription factors, ECM proteins, MMPs. In cardiac fibroblasts, the potential target genes include collagen 158, fibronectin 159, intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) 160.

NF-κB

NF-κB is one of the most well-known transcription factors that control a number of inflammation-related genes. The mammalian NF-κB super family consists of 5 genes encoding RelA, RelB, c-Rel, p50, and p52. NF-κB is composed as a heterodimer of these members, and regulates the transcription of genes that contain κB binding sites. In the absence of activating signal, NF-κB exists in the cytoplasm of cells and is bound by an inhibitory IκB family protein. The DNA-binding activity of NF-κB could be rapidly induced by proinflammatory factors in all the cells 161. NF-κB can be activated by reactive oxygen species (ROS), hypoxia, hyperoxia, cytokines, growth factors which produced by profibrotic stimuli. These stimuli led to free NF-κB translocating into the nucleus and regulating the transcription of genes. NF-κB dimers bind a consensus DNA element called the “κB site” (5'-GGGRNWYYCC-3'; R, A or G; N, any nucleotide; W, A or T; Y, C or T). NF-κB directly regulated the expression fibrosis-related genes, including PAI-1, fibronectin and MMPs. Ang II-stimulated pro-fibrotic process was regulated by NF-κB activation 162. NF-κB also suppressed the expression of miR-26, thus increasing collagen I and CTGF gene expression in the presence of Ang II 163. NF-κB could regulate the mRNA levels of several profibrotic cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and interferon-γ), cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase, leukocyte adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin) 164. These factors further activated NF-κB, forming a positive feedback loop to amplify the fibrotic response.

ATF3

ATF3, a member of the activating transcription factor/cAMP responsive element-binding protein (ATF/CREB) family of transcription factors, binds to a consensus DNA sequence (TGACGTCA)165,166. ATF3 could be induced by profibrotic conditions, such as injury, ischemia, chemical toxin, Ang II and H2O2 167,168. Using transgenic mice with cardiac-specific expression of ATF3, Okamoto et al found that this mice exhibited fibrosis 169. However, the finding in our study demonstrated that ATF3 deficiency promotes pathological hypertrophy and fibrosis 170.The first possibility for the discrepancy due to consistent high expression level of ATF3 in the transgenic mice. This hypothesis was supported by another study that adenovirus-mediated expression of ATF3 could inhibit doxorubicin-induced cardiomyocytes apoptosis 171. A recent study reported using a miRNA-aided/lentivirus to overexpress ATF3 in the cardiac fibroblast and using periostin-Cre mice to construct a fibroblast-specific ATF3 deficiency mice found that ATF3 protected against cardiac fibrosis via suppression of Map2K3 expression and p38 MAPK signaling 172.

Myocardin-related transcription factor/SRF

SRF, is a globally expressed transcription factor, which regulates cardiac differentiation and maturation. SRF regulates gene expression via binding to CArG box [CC(A/T)6GG] 173. Specificity of gene activation by SRF is regulated by its interactions with tissue-specific or signal-responsive transcriptional coregulators 174. One of the best-known cofactors responsible for this activity is myocardin-related transcription factor (MRTF) family. The activity of MRTF is regulated by variations in the cellular concentration of G-actin. TGF-β1 could induce the nuclear localization and activity of MRTF via modulating Rho-mediated actin dynamics 175. In addition, MRTFs and Smad3 synergistically activated CArG element-containing promoters during myofibroblasts activation 176. Exogenous expression of MRTF-A in fibroblasts or epithelial cells could induce phenotypic transformation into myofibroblasts 177,178. Forced expression of MRTF-A in cardiac fibroblasts promoted the production of robust SMA-positive fibers 174. Conversely, genetic deletion of MRTF-A in mice led to reduced scar formation following ischemic injury or Ang II treatment via reducing SMA-positive myofibroblasts and suppressed fibrosis-associated genes 175. SRF overexpression promoted cardiac fibrosis and increases CTGF expression by inducing miR-133a expression 179. Currently, mice with CF-specific depletion of SRF has not yet been reported, therefore, future study focusing this area would be of great importance. Esnault et al. showed that MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-14 were all MRTF/SRF targets in fibroblasts 180. MRTF-A/SRF directly regulated Col1α2 gene expression to promote cardiac fibrosis 175.

Nuclear factor of activated T-cells

Sustained, low-level calcium influx resulted in the activation of calcineurin, which dephosphorylated NFATc family members and promoted nuclear translocation to regulate gene expression 181. Mechanical stress and alteration in intracellular calcium levels could activate NFAT in fibroblasts. Activated NFAT regulated the gene expression of collagen III and MRTF-A in CFs 182,183. Activation of NFAT via calcineurin overexpression was sufficient to induce myofibroblasts differentiation both in vivo and in vitro 184,185. Further study using mice with CFs-specific depletion of NFAT to investigate the precise role of NFAT would be of great interest.

Potential therapeutic targets for cardiac fibrosis

Pirfenidone is a small molecule that can inhibit TGF-β activity. Pirfenidone has been approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Japan 186. However, in a mouse model of myocardial infarction, TGF-β antibody treatment resulted in increased mortality and worsened ventricular remodeling187, suggesting that broad targeting of TGF-β activity might not be a viable antifibrotic strategy. Drugs that inhibit the angiotensin pathway (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists) have been widely used in clinical for the treatment of heart failure. In a human experiment, patients with hypertension and hypertrophy had significant regression of fibrosis and increased cardiac function after a 6-month course of lisinopril treatment188, implying that angiotensin pathway antagonists may be useful approaches to control fibrotic disease. There are strong in vivo evidence directly that support the key roles of inflammatory factors in development of cardiac fibrosis. Tanercept, an anti-TNF-α agent, prevented TNF-α-mediated cardiac fibrosis, but unexpectedly augmented TNF-α cytotoxicity 189. Smad3 signaling plays an essential role in fibrotic response. Bujak and the colleagues found that mice with Smad3 deficiency had reduced fibrotic remodeling. Unexpectedly, increased myofibroblast density was also observed in Smad3 knockout mice 28,108, suggesting that targeting Smad3 might not be a viable antifibrotic strategy. AMPKα activation might be considered as an appropriate therapy for the fibrosis. The finding from our lab found that activation of AMPKα prevented cardiac fibrosis induced by pressure overload in mice 190. Moreover, metformin, a best-known AMPKα activator, has been safely used in clinical for a long time. In addition, the development of specific inhibitors of MRTF/SRF signaling, such as CCG-1423 104 and CCG-203971, is of particular interest 191,192. CCG-1423 inhibited TGF-β induced myofibroblasts differentiation in a fibrosis model 193. Future study should validate safety and efficacy of the specific inhibitors in the clinical cardiac fibrosis setting.

Future challenges

Although fibrosis has been documented in several cardiac conditions, the mechanisms responsible for this disease remain unknown. Moreover, our knowledge about the mechanisms of cardiac fibrosis predominantly came from experiments performed in cell-culture systems or global knockout mice. Understanding how the process of CF proliferation and transformation into myofibroblasts are regulated upon injury are hampered by the lack of suitable fibroblast markers and appropriate lineage mapping tools. Another decade may have to elapse before a satisfactory level of understanding about the mechanism of cardiac fibrosis is achieved.