| Literature DB >> 31366180 |
Tomomi Nonoyama1,2, Elena Kazamia1, Hermanus Nawaly3, Xia Gao1, Yoshinori Tsuji3, Yusuke Matsuda3,4, Chris Bowler1, Tsuyoshi Tanaka5, Richard G Dorrell6.
Abstract
: Of all the eukaryotic algal groups, diatoms make the most substantial contributions to photosynthesis in the contemporary ocean. Understanding the biological innovations that have occurred in the diatom chloroplast may provide us with explanations to the ecological success of this lineage and clues as to how best to exploit the biology of these organisms for biotechnology. In this paper, we use multi-species transcriptome datasets to compare chloroplast metabolism pathways in diatoms to other algal lineages. We identify possible diatom-specific innovations in chloroplast metabolism, including the completion of tocopherol synthesis via a chloroplast-targeted tocopherol cyclase, a complete chloroplast ornithine cycle, and chloroplast-targeted proteins involved in iron acquisition and CO2 concentration not shared between diatoms and their closest relatives in the stramenopiles. We additionally present a detailed investigation of the chloroplast metabolism of the oil-producing diatom Fistulifera solaris, which is of industrial interest for biofuel production. These include modified amino acid and pyruvate hub metabolism that might enhance acetyl-coA production for chloroplast lipid biosynthesis and the presence of a chloroplast-localised squalene synthesis pathway unknown in other diatoms. Our data provides valuable insights into the biological adaptations underpinning an ecologically critical lineage, and how chloroplast metabolism can change even at a species level in extant algae.Entities:
Keywords: MMETSP; biotechnology; isoprenoids; plastid proteome; secondary endosymbiosis; stramenopiles
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31366180 PMCID: PMC6723447 DOI: 10.3390/biom9080322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Diatom diversity and origins. Panel (A) shows scanning electron micrograph images of (i) Thalassiosira pseudonana (polar centric diatom, scale bar: 2 µm; [30]); (ii) Leptocylindrus hargravesii (radial centric diatom, scale bar: 5 µm); (iii) Fragilariopsis cylindrus (raphid pennate diatom, [31]); (iv) Fistulifera solaris JPCC DA0580 (raphid pennate diatom, authors’ own image). Panel (B) shows a global timeline of atmospheric CO2 (orange) and O2 concentrations (blue), adapted from [32], with key events in diatom evolution, as described in [33,34,35]. Abbreviated geological epochs are as follows: Camb., Cambrian; Ordo., Ordovician; Sil., Silurian; Dev., Devonian; Carb., Carboniferous. Green arrows show key points in diatom evolution: (A), median inferred radiation from molecular clock data of photosynthetic stramenopiles (>600 MYA); (B), median inferred date from molecular clock data for divergence of diatoms and bolidophytes (350 MYA); (C), earliest identifiable diatom fossils (250 MYA); (D), earliest identifiable pennate diatom fossils (125 MYA); (E), earliest identifiable polar centric diatom fossils (95 MYA); (F), earliest identifiable raphid pennate diatom fossils (20 MYA). Purple arrows show corresponding events in geological history that may have impacted diatom evolution and diversification: 1, subduction of Tethyan trench (150 MYA); 2, uplift of Himalayan plateau and opening of Drake passage and Southern circumpolar current (between 55 and 41 MYA). Figure 1Ai: Reproduced with permission from Eike Brunner, Patrick Richthammer, Hermann Ehrlich, Silvia Paasch, Paul Simon, Susanne Ueberlein, Karl-Heinz van Pée, Angewandte Chemie International Edition; published by John Wiley and Sons, 2009. Figure 1Aii: Reproduced with permission from Deepak Nanjappa, Wiebe H. C. F. Kooistra, Adriana Zingone, Journal of Phycology; published by John Wileyand Sons, 2013. Figure 1Aiii: Reproduced under the Creative Commons license from Thomas Mock, Robert P. Otillar, Jan Strauss, Mark McMullan, Pirita Paajanen, Jeremy Schmutz, Asaf Salamov, Remo Sanges, Andrew Toseland, Ben J. Ward, Andrew E. Allen, Christopher L. Dupont, Stephan Frickenhaus, Florian Maumus, Alaguraj Veluchamy, Taoyang Wu, Kerrie W. Barry, Angela Falciatore, Maria I. Ferrante, Antonio E. Fortunato, Gernot Glöckner, Ansgar Gruber, Rachel Hipkin, Michael G. Janech, Peter G. Kroth, Florian Leese, Erika A. Lindquist, Barbara R. Lyon, Joel Martin, Christoph Mayer, Micaela Parker, Hadi Quesneville, James A. Raymond, Christiane Uhlig, Ruben E. Valas, Klaus U. Valentin, Alexandra Z. Worden, E. Virginia Armbrust, Matthew D. Clark, Chris Bowler, Beverley R. Green, Vincent Moulton, Cock van Oosterhout, Igor V. Grigoriev, Nature; published by Springer Nature Publishing AG, 2017. Figure 1B: Reproduced with permission from Richard G. Dorrell, Alison G. Smith, Eukaryotic Cell; published by American Society for Microbiology, 2011.
Figure 2Origins and structure of the diatom chloroplast. This schematic figure shows two alternative hypotheses for the origins of the diatom chloroplast [4,25,42]: (a) secondary endosymbiosis of a red alga by a common ancestor of photosynthetic stramenopiles or (b) tertiary endosymbiosis of a cryptomonad-like organism, itself harbouring a chloroplast of secondary, red algal endosymbiotic origin. Either the host or the endosymbionts may have possessed genes retained from a cryptic endosymbiont of green algal origin [25,43,44,45], although this remains debated [44,45]. Other chloroplast-targeted proteins (indicated by the presence of coloured diamonds) may have been recruited from bacterial sources, either in the host or symbiont, proteins or paralogous copies of proteins previously targeted to other host cell organelles or may even have evolved de novo at the point of endosymbiosis [25]. (c) shows a schematic diagram of the four membranes surrounding the diatom chloroplast, adapted from [4]. Abbreviations are as follows: cERM; chloroplast endoplasmic reticular membrane; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; iEM, inner envelope membrane; IMS, intermembrane space; oEM, outer envelope membrane; PPC, periplastid compartment; PPM, periplastid membrane.
Figure 3Innovations in metabolic complexity in the diatom chloroplast. Panel (A) shows KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways that could be assigned to the chloroplasts of diatoms and their close relatives, based on the evolutionary distributions of 9531 chloroplast-targeted proteins identified by Dorrell et al. [25,58]. KEGG functions were identified using KEGG mapper [63], and key chloroplast metabolism pathways are annotated following [60]. Blue lines show metabolic pathways present in the common ancestor of diatoms, bolidophytes, pelagophytes, and dictyochophytes; red lines show pathways subsequently gained by a common ancestor of the chloroplasts of pennate and polar centric diatoms; and green lines show pathways conserved between but performed by different enzymes in each lineage. Panel (B) compares the protein sets identified in the ochrophyte common ancestor; the common ancestor of diatoms, bolidophytes, pelagophytes, and dictyochophytes; and the common ancestor of pennate and polar centric diatoms to published experimental and phylogenomic plastid protein datasets for Arabidopsis [60], the green alga Chlamydomonas [61], the red alga Cyanidioschyzon [62], and the glaucophyte Cyanophora [59]. Protein co-occurrence is detected by reciprocal BLASTp/BLASTp search best-hit between each dataset with bidirectional threshold evalue 1 × 10−5. Complete plastid proteome outputs for each species, and reciprocal BLAST best hit analysis between proteome datasets, are provided in Table S1.
Figure 4Evolutionary distributions of chloroplast proteins restricted to diatoms and their close relatives. This figure shows the evolutionary distributions of chloroplast-targeted proteins involved in (A) iron metabolism, (B) ornithine metabolism, and (C) organic compound synthesis, inferred from the pipeline used in Figure 3A, across photosynthetic stramenopiles, haptophytes, and cryptomonads. Lineages are arranged into monophyletic taxonomic groups, following published phylogenies [36,69]. The inner wheel of each diagram (bounded with black lines) shows the total numbers of species within a given lineage for which chloroplast-targeted proteins were identified, and the outer wheel of each diagram shows the number of species within a given lineage for any protein homologue (including those with non-chloroplast or ambiguous targeting signals) could be identified. Exemplar GFP localisations for enzymes associated with the probable diatom chloroplast ornithine cycle are shown in Figure S1. Presence and absence distributions of each protein, listed by species, are provided in Table S1.
Figure 5Evolution of chloroplast-targeted diatom carbonic anhydrases. Panel (A) shows the number (labels) and proportion of chloroplast-targeted sequences (bars) identified for theta and iota carbonic anhydrases in diatoms and other stramenopile, cryptomonad and haptophyte lineages, by reciprocal BLAST best hit analysis. Detailed outputs are provided for the distribution of theta, alpha, and beta carbonic anhydrases and iota carbonic anhydrases, across diatom species in Figures S2 and S3, respectively. Panel (B) shows the consensus Bayesian topology of a 204 taxa × 210 aa alignment of theta-carbonic anhydrase sequences across the tree of life. Three clades of diatom chloroplast-targeted proteins are shown with circular brackets. Sequence names are shaded by taxonomic origin and are labelled with predicted localisations (chloroplast, endomembrane system, and/or mitochondria). Alignment and tree topologies under each programme and matrix considered are shown in Table S2.
Figure 6Innovations in the Fistulifera solaris chloroplast. Panel (A) shows a Fistulifera solaris cell visualized under bright field and fluorescence microscopy. The conspicuous lipid droplets (LD) are visualized using BODIPY (boron-dipyrromethene) 505/515 staining (in green) and chlorophyll fluorescence (Chl) is shown in red; scale bar = 5 µm. Panel (B) shows schematic pathway diagrams for (i) pyruvate hub metabolism; (ii) branched chain amino acid synthesis; and (iii) isoprenoid metabolism as inferred from the F. solaris genome [21]. Each circle equates to one distinct copy of each gene. Genes labelled in red are those for which F. solaris has different metabolic arrangements to other diatom species considered. Panel (C) shows detailed localisation predictions for homologues of key enzymes implicated in modified chloroplast metabolism in F. solaris [21], alongside equivalent data for (i) T. pseudonana, P. tricornutum, and F. cylindrus [94], (ii) T. pseudonana and P. tricornutum [91], and (iii) P. tricornutum and R. setigera [24,95]. The symbol ‘?’ depicts a sequence without a cleavable signal peptide but predicted as a transmembrane protein. Sequence IDs shown in this figure are provided in Table S3. Panel (D) shows a three-dimensional fluorescence microscope image of a line of F. solaris expressing a C-terminal GFP full length fusion construct of native squalene synthase protein, following previous methodology [21,25,96]. Cells visualised show two localisation patterns, both previously indicated to the periplastid compartment [97]—either (i) elongated localisation along the chloroplast periphery or (ii) across the mid-band of dividing chloroplasts. A diagram of the targeting sequence of this protein is provided in Figure S4.