Literature DB >> 34753738

Neural Presbyacusis in Humans Inferred from Age-Related Differences in Auditory Nerve Function and Structure.

Kelly C Harris1, Jayne B Ahlstrom2, James W Dias2, Lilyana B Kerouac2, Carolyn M McClaskey2, Judy R Dubno2, Mark A Eckert2.   

Abstract

A common complaint of older adults is difficulty understanding speech, particularly in challenging listening conditions. Accumulating evidence suggests that these difficulties may reflect a loss and/or dysfunction of auditory nerve (AN) fibers. We used a novel approach to study age-related changes in AN structure and several measures of AN function, including neural synchrony, in 58 older adults and 42 younger adults. AN activity was measured in response to an auditory click (compound action potential; CAP), presented at stimulus levels ranging from 70 to 110 dB pSPL. Poorer AN function was observed for older than younger adults across CAP measures at higher but not lower stimulus levels. Associations across metrics and stimulus levels were consistent with age-related AN disengagement and AN dyssynchrony. High-resolution T2-weighted structural imaging revealed age-related differences in the density of cranial nerve VIII, with lower density in older adults with poorer neural synchrony. Individual differences in neural synchrony were the strongest predictor of speech recognition, such that poorer synchrony predicted poorer recognition of time-compressed speech and poorer speech recognition in noise for both younger and older adults. These results have broad clinical implications and are consistent with an interpretation that age-related atrophy at the level of the AN contributes to poorer neural synchrony and may explain some of the perceptual difficulties of older adults.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Differences in auditory nerve (AN) pathophysiology may contribute to the large variations in hearing and communication abilities of older adults. However, current diagnostics focus largely on the increase in detection thresholds, which is likely because of the absence of indirect measures of AN function in standard clinical test batteries. Using novel metrics of AN function, combined with estimates of AN structure and auditory function, we identified age-related differences across measures that we interpret to represent age-related reductions in AN engagement and poorer neural synchrony. Structure-function associations are consistent with an explanation of AN deficits that arise from age-related atrophy of the AN. Associations between neural synchrony and speech recognition suggest that individual and age-related deficits in neural synchrony contribute to speech recognition deficits.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; auditory nerve; compound action potential; neural synchrony; speech recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34753738      PMCID: PMC8672696          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1747-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  65 in total

1.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Kimberly Jenkins; Rachel Lieberman; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex.

Authors:  P Heil; D R Irvine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Recognition of rapid speech by blind and sighted older adults.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Sarah A Friedman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Middle Ear Muscle Reflex and Word Recognition in "Normal-Hearing" Adults: Evidence for Cochlear Synaptopathy?

Authors:  Anita M Mepani; Sarah A Kirk; Kenneth E Hancock; Kara Bennett; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-12

6.  Sustained envelope periodicity representations are associated with speech-in-noise performance in difficult listening conditions for younger and older adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Noise-induced and age-related hearing loss:  new perspectives and potential therapies.

Authors:  M Charles Liberman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-06-16

8.  PsyAcoustX: A flexible MATLAB(®) package for psychoacoustics research.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-12

9.  Effects of Age, Cognition, and Neural Encoding on the Perception of Temporal Speech Cues.

Authors:  Lindsey Roque; Hanin Karawani; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Auditory Brainstem Response Latency in Noise as a Marker of Cochlear Synaptopathy.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Ann E Hickox; Hari M Bharadwaj; Hannah Goldberg; Sarah Verhulst; M Charles Liberman; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Afferent loss, GABA, and Central Gain in older adults: Associations with speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Jeffrey Rumschlag; James Prisciandaro; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Predicting neural deficits in sensorineural hearing loss from word recognition scores.

Authors:  Kelsie J Grant; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Viacheslav Vasilkov; Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter; Maria E Freitas; Victor de Gruttola; Daniel B Polley; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Two distinct types of nodes of Ranvier support auditory nerve function in the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Clarisse H Panganiban; Jeremy L Barth; Junying Tan; Kenyaria V Noble; Carolyn M McClaskey; Blake A Howard; Shabih H Jafri; James W Dias; Kelly C Harris; Hainan Lang
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 8.073

5.  Age-related central gain with degraded neural synchrony in the auditory brainstem of mice and humans.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rumschlag; Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Lilyana B Kerouac; Kenyaria V Noble; Clarisse Panganiban; Hainan Lang; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.133

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.