Literature DB >> 31359571

Forecasting species range dynamics with process-explicit models: matching methods to applications.

Natalie J Briscoe1, Jane Elith1, Roberto Salguero-Gómez2,3,4, José J Lahoz-Monfort1, James S Camac1, Katherine M Giljohann1, Matthew H Holden3, Bronwyn A Hradsky1, Michael R Kearney1, Sean M McMahon5, Ben L Phillips1, Tracey J Regan1,6, Jonathan R Rhodes7, Peter A Vesk1, Brendan A Wintle1, Jian D L Yen1, Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita1.   

Abstract

Knowing where species occur is fundamental to many ecological and environmental applications. Species distribution models (SDMs) are typically based on correlations between species occurrence data and environmental predictors, with ecological processes captured only implicitly. However, there is a growing interest in approaches that explicitly model processes such as physiology, dispersal, demography and biotic interactions. These models are believed to offer more robust predictions, particularly when extrapolating to novel conditions. Many process-explicit approaches are now available, but it is not clear how we can best draw on this expanded modelling toolbox to address ecological problems and inform management decisions. Here, we review a range of process-explicit models to determine their strengths and limitations, as well as their current use. Focusing on four common applications of SDMs - regulatory planning, extinction risk, climate refugia and invasive species - we then explore which models best meet management needs. We identify barriers to more widespread and effective use of process-explicit models and outline how these might be overcome. As well as technical and data challenges, there is a pressing need for more thorough evaluation of model predictions to guide investment in method development and ensure the promise of these new approaches is fully realised.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  Demography; mechanistic; population dynamics; process-based models; species distribution model

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31359571     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  12 in total

1.  Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy.

Authors:  David Leclère; Michael Obersteiner; Mike Barrett; Stuart H M Butchart; Abhishek Chaudhary; Adriana De Palma; Fabrice A J DeClerck; Moreno Di Marco; Jonathan C Doelman; Martina Dürauer; Robin Freeman; Michael Harfoot; Tomoko Hasegawa; Stefanie Hellweg; Jelle P Hilbers; Samantha L L Hill; Florian Humpenöder; Nancy Jennings; Tamás Krisztin; Georgina M Mace; Haruka Ohashi; Alexander Popp; Andy Purvis; Aafke M Schipper; Andrzej Tabeau; Hugo Valin; Hans van Meijl; Willem-Jan van Zeist; Piero Visconti; Rob Alkemade; Rosamunde Almond; Gill Bunting; Neil D Burgess; Sarah E Cornell; Fulvio Di Fulvio; Simon Ferrier; Steffen Fritz; Shinichiro Fujimori; Monique Grooten; Thomas Harwood; Petr Havlík; Mario Herrero; Andrew J Hoskins; Martin Jung; Tom Kram; Hermann Lotze-Campen; Tetsuya Matsui; Carsten Meyer; Deon Nel; Tim Newbold; Guido Schmidt-Traub; Elke Stehfest; Bernardo B N Strassburg; Detlef P van Vuuren; Chris Ware; James E M Watson; Wenchao Wu; Lucy Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Individual-based eco-evolutionary models for understanding adaptation in changing seas.

Authors:  Amanda Xuereb; Quentin Rougemont; Peter Tiffin; Huijie Xue; Megan Phifer-Rixey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Dynamic Energy Budget models: fertile ground for understanding resource allocation in plants in a changing world.

Authors:  Sabrina E Russo; Glenn Ledder; Erik B Muller; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Global implications of crop-based bioenergy with carbon capture and storage for terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity.

Authors:  Steef V Hanssen; Zoran J N Steinmann; Vassilis Daioglou; Mirza Čengić; Detlef P Van Vuuren; Mark A J Huijbregts
Journal:  Glob Change Biol Bioenergy       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.957

5.  Paninvasion severity assessment of a U.S. grape pest to disrupt the global wine market.

Authors:  Nicholas A Huron; Jocelyn E Behm; Matthew R Helmus
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-07-04

6.  Racing against change: understanding dispersal and persistence to improve species' conservation prospects.

Authors:  Jeremy T Kerr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Roughing it: terrain is crucial in identifying novel translocation sites for the vulnerable brush-tailed rock-wallaby (Petrogale pencillata).

Authors:  Shane D Morris; Christopher N Johnson; Barry W Brook
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  The shadow model: how and why small choices in spatially explicit species distribution models affect predictions.

Authors:  Christian J C Commander; Lewis A K Barnett; Eric J Ward; Sean C Anderson; Timothy E Essington
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Autumn larval cold tolerance does not predict the northern range limit of a widespread butterfly species.

Authors:  Philippe Tremblay; Heath A MacMillan; Heather M Kharouba
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Explicit integration of dispersal-related metrics improves predictions of SDM in predatory arthropods.

Authors:  Jérémy Monsimet; Olivier Devineau; Julien Pétillon; Denis Lafage
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.