Literature DB >> 36128259

Dynamic Energy Budget models: fertile ground for understanding resource allocation in plants in a changing world.

Sabrina E Russo1,2, Glenn Ledder3, Erik B Muller4,5, Roger M Nisbet4,6.   

Abstract

Climate change is having dramatic effects on the diversity and distribution of species. Many of these effects are mediated by how an organism's physiological patterns of resource allocation translate into fitness through effects on growth, survival and reproduction. Empirically, resource allocation is challenging to measure directly and so has often been approached using mathematical models, such as Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) models. The fact that all plants require a very similar set of exogenous resources, namely light, water and nutrients, integrates well with the DEB framework in which a small number of variables and processes linked through pathways represent an organism's state as it changes through time. Most DEB theory has been developed in reference to animals and microorganisms. However, terrestrial vascular plants differ from these organisms in fundamental ways that make resource allocation, and the trade-offs and feedbacks arising from it, particularly fundamental to their life histories, but also challenging to represent using existing DEB theory. Here, we describe key features of the anatomy, morphology, physiology, biochemistry, and ecology of terrestrial vascular plants that should be considered in the development of a generic DEB model for plants. We then describe possible approaches to doing so using existing DEB theory and point out features that may require significant development for DEB theory to accommodate them. We end by presenting a generic DEB model for plants that accounts for many of these key features and describing gaps that would need to be addressed for DEB theory to predict the responses of plants to climate change. DEB models offer a powerful and generalizable framework for modelling resource allocation in terrestrial vascular plants, and our review contributes a framework for expansion and development of DEB theory to address how plants respond to anthropogenic change.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36128259      PMCID: PMC9477497          DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coac061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Physiol        ISSN: 2051-1434            Impact factor:   3.252


  133 in total

1.  The raison d'ĕtre of secondary plant substances; these odd chemicals arose as a means of protecting plants from insects and now guide insects to food.

Authors:  G S FRAENKEL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1959-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Functional traits determine trade-offs and niches in a tropical forest community.

Authors:  Frank Sterck; Lars Markesteijn; Feike Schieving; Lourens Poorter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate.

Authors:  A B Nicotra; O K Atkin; S P Bonser; A M Davidson; E J Finnegan; U Mathesius; P Poot; M D Purugganan; C L Richards; F Valladares; M van Kleunen
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Baobab trees (Adansonia) in Madagascar use stored water to flush new leaves but not to support stomatal opening before the rainy season.

Authors:  Saharah Moon Chapotin; Juvet H Razanameharizaka; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Self-shading, carbon gain and leaf dynamics: a test of alternative optimality models.

Authors:  David Ackerly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Geographical limits to species-range shifts are suggested by climate velocity.

Authors:  Michael T Burrows; David S Schoeman; Anthony J Richardson; Jorge García Molinos; Ary Hoffmann; Lauren B Buckley; Pippa J Moore; Christopher J Brown; John F Bruno; Carlos M Duarte; Benjamin S Halpern; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Carrie V Kappel; Wolfgang Kiessling; Mary I O'Connor; John M Pandolfi; Camille Parmesan; William J Sydeman; Simon Ferrier; Kristen J Williams; Elvira S Poloczanska
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity.

Authors:  Mark C Brundrett; Leho Tedersoo
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 8.  How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology.

Authors:  Leho Tedersoo; Mohammad Bahram; Martin Zobel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Lithological constraints on resource economies shape the mycorrhizal composition of a Bornean rain forest.

Authors:  Monique Weemstra; Kabir G Peay; Stuart J Davies; Mohizah Mohamad; Akira Itoh; Sylvester Tan; Sabrina E Russo
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Stomatal conductance limited the CO2 response of grassland in the last century.

Authors:  Juan C Baca Cabrera; Regina T Hirl; Rudi Schäufele; Andy Macdonald; Hans Schnyder
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.