Literature DB >> 31359123

Radiology and patient communication: if not now, then when?

Julie Cox1,2, Yitka Graham3,4.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: • Communication with patients in radiology is, in general, indirect using the referrer as a conduit. • Direct patient communication may be beneficial for radiology departments and radiologists to improve patient awareness about the nature of our role and also to provide correct and measured information about the nature and frequency of discrepancies in radiology.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31359123     DOI： 10.1007/s00330-019-06349-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN： 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  9 in total

Review 1.  Communicating results of all radiologic examinations directly to patients: has the time come?

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Clinicians' perceptions of the quality of outsourced radiology and actions taken around perceived imaging errors in practice.

Authors:  Yitka Graham; Catherine Hayes; Pallavi Mehrotra; Jonathan Spratt; Kathryn Siddle; Julie Cox
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care?

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Regine Heiland; Sonja Sudarski; Johannes M Froehlich; Klaus Hergan; Matthias Meissnitzer; Sebastian Kos; Peter Bertke; Orpheus Kolokythas; Dow M Koh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Error in radiology-where are we now?

Authors:  Giles Maskell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Access to radiologic reports via a patient portal: clinical simulations to investigate patient preferences.

Authors:  Annette J Johnson; Doug Easterling; Roman Nelson; Michael Y Chen; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Patients' opinion of mammography screening services: immediate results versus delayed results due to interpretation by two observers.

Authors:  C A Hulka; P J Slanetz; E F Halpern; D A Hall; K A McCarthy; R Moore; S Boutin; D B Kopans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  How do breast imaging centers communicate results to women with limited English proficiency and other barriers to care?

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Monica Yepes; Lee Sanders
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

Review 8.  Web-based results distribution: new channels of communication from radiologists to patients.

Authors:  Annette J Johnson; Hugh Hawkins; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  How often do patients ask for the results of their radiological studies?

Authors:  Enrico Capaccio; Andrea Podestà; Daniele Morcaldi; Maria Pia Sormani; Lorenzo Egildo Derchi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-01-28
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Direct communication between radiologists and patients improves the quality of imaging reports.

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Elisabeth Sartoretti; Clemens Reisinger; Janusch Blautzik; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; Sebastian Kos; Arne Fischmann; Ricardo Donners; Dorothee Harder; Matthias Meissnitzer; Klaus Hergan; Selina Largiadèr; Rosemarie Forstner; Johannes M Froehlich; Carolin Reischauer; Simon Matoori; Dow Mu Koh; Thomas Sartoretti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Communicating with patients in the age of online portals-challenges and opportunities on the horizon for radiologists.

Authors:  Christoph D Becker; Elmar Kotter
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  What radiologists need to know about patients' expectations: P.A.T.I.E.N.T.S C.A.R.E.R.S A.I.M.S.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-03-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.