Literature DB >> 22469376

Access to radiologic reports via a patient portal: clinical simulations to investigate patient preferences.

Annette J Johnson1, Doug Easterling, Roman Nelson, Michael Y Chen, Richard M Frankel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine (1) the patient-preferred timing characteristics of a system for online patient access to radiologic reports and (2) patient resource needs and preferences after exposure to reports.
METHODS: Adult outpatients from a single imaging center completed researcher-administered electronic questionnaires. Participants were exposed to 3 simulated clinical scenarios and asked to answer questions on the basis of what they thought they would do in each. Scenarios included symptomatology and written radiology reports that were nearly normal, seriously abnormal, and indeterminate, with reports containing typical medical terminology. Participants were asked about preferred timing for online access to reports, communication methods, educational resources, and alternative formats. McNemar's test correlated proportions and generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate responses.
RESULTS: Participants (n = 53) most often preferred immediate access to reports: 32 (60.2%) for the nearly normal scenario, 25 (47.2%) for the seriously abnormal scenario, and 24 (45.3%) for the indeterminate scenario. Three-day delayed access was next most commonly preferred: 15 (28.3%), 19 (35.8%), and 19 (35.8%), respectively. Forty-two participants (79.2%) preferred the portal method of notification over ways they have historically gotten results, with an increased proportion being satisfied with it overall (P < .04). Most would use a variety of educational resources and found alternative lay language conclusions and hyperlinks helpful.
CONCLUSIONS: Some outpatients want immediate online access to complete, written radiologic reports and would use multiple resources to understand report contents. Effects of immediate access on provider workflow and on anxiety and autonomy among a diverse population of patients still need to be studied.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22469376     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  19 in total

Review 1.  Interval examination: moving toward open notes.

Authors:  Jan Walker; Tom Delbanco
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Radiology and patient communication: if not now, then when?

Authors:  Julie Cox; Yitka Graham
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Supporting Families in Reviewing and Communicating about Radiology Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Matthew K Hong; Clayton Feustel; Meeshu Agnihotri; Max Silverman; Stephen F Simoneaux; Lauren Wilcox
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2017-05-02

4.  PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting.

Authors:  Seong Cheol Oh; Tessa S Cook; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Multi-institutional Experience with Patient Image Access Through Electronic Health Record Patient Portals.

Authors:  Hailey H Choi; Amy L Kotsenas; Joshua Vic Chen; Christina Bronsky; Christopher J Roth; Marc D Kohli
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Barriers to Patient Portal Access and Use: Evidence from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Sherine El-Toukhy; Alejandra Méndez; Shavonne Collins; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

7.  Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports?

Authors:  Caroline E Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Tessa S Cook; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Imaging informatics for consumer health: towards a radiology patient portal.

Authors:  Corey W Arnold; Mary McNamara; Suzie El-Saden; Shawn Chen; Ricky K Taira; Alex A T Bui
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.

Authors:  Taya Irizarry; Annette DeVito Dabbs; Christine R Curran
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Communicating laboratory test results for rheumatoid factor: what do patients and physicians want?

Authors:  Ariella Kelman; Caroline O Robinson; Elisenda Cochin; Nina J Ahluwalia; Julia Braverman; Emil Chiauzzi; Kristina Simacek
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.