Literature DB >> 30457880

Error in radiology-where are we now?

Giles Maskell1.   

Abstract

Error is inherent in radiological practice. Our awareness of the extent of this and the reasons behind it has increased in recent times. Our next step must be the development of a shared understanding with our patients of the limitations as well as the huge benefits of medical imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30457880      PMCID: PMC6540865          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  9 in total

1.  Variation between experienced observers in the interpretation of accident and emergency radiographs.

Authors:  P J Robinson; D Wilson; A Coral; A Murphy; P Verow
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The tyranny of accuracy in radiologic education.

Authors:  Richard B Gunderman; James M Nyce
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists.

Authors:  Hani H Abujudeh; Giles W Boland; Rathachai Kaewlai; Pavel Rabiner; Elkarn F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle; James H Thrall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The effect of voice recognition software on comparative error rates in radiology reports.

Authors:  S McGurk; K Brauer; T V Macfarlane; K A Duncan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Cindy S Lee; Paul G Nagy; Sallie J Weaver; David E Newman-Toker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image.

Authors:  P J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Missed lesions at abdominal oncologic CT: lessons learned from quality assurance.

Authors:  Bettina Siewert; Jacob Sosna; Ann McNamara; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Jonathan B Kruskal
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Now you see it, now you don't: visual illusions in radiology.

Authors:  Christopher E Buckle; Viyan Udawatta; Christopher M Straus
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable?

Authors:  Adrian P Brady
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-12-07
  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Radiology and patient communication: if not now, then when?

Authors:  Julie Cox; Yitka Graham
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Automated Color-Coding of Lesion Changes in Contrast-Enhanced 3D T1-Weighted Sequences for MRI Follow-up of Brain Metastases.

Authors:  D Zopfs; K Laukamp; R Reimer; N Grosse Hokamp; C Kabbasch; J Borggrefe; L Pennig; A C Bunck; M Schlamann; S Lennartz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Evaluation of neuroradiology emergency MRI interpretations: low discrepancy rates between on-call radiology residents' preliminary interpretations and neuroradiologists' final reports.

Authors:  Diana Salca; François Lersy; Thibault Willaume; Marie Stoessel; Agnieszka Lefèvre; François-Daniel Ardellier; Caroline Nicolaï; Abtine Nouri; Seyyid Baloglu; Guillaume Bierry; Agathe Chammas; Stéphane Kremer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Communicating with patients in the age of online portals-challenges and opportunities on the horizon for radiologists.

Authors:  Christoph D Becker; Elmar Kotter
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  The role of radiologist in the changing world of healthcare: a White Paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR).

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-06-04

6.  Repeatability of radiographic assessments for feline hip dysplasia suggest consensus scores in radiology are more uncertain than commonly assumed.

Authors:  Elisabeth Ball; Margareta Uhlhorn; Per Eksell; Ulrika Olsson; Åsa Ohlsson; Matthew Low
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Radiologists and Clinical Trials: Part 1 The Truth About Reader Disagreements.

Authors:  Annette M Schmid; David L Raunig; Colin G Miller; Richard C Walovitch; Robert W Ford; Michael O'Connor; Guenther Brueggenwerth; Josy Breuer; Liz Kuney; Robert R Ford
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 8.  Visual Illusions in Radiology: Untrue Perceptions in Medical Images and Their Implications for Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Fahd Yazdanie; Stephen Waite; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Srinivas Kolla; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.152

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.