Literature DB >> 31358460

Annotated normal CT data of the abdomen for deep learning: Challenges and strategies for implementation.

S Park1, L C Chu1, E K Fishman1, A L Yuille2, B Vogelstein3, K W Kinzler3, K M Horton1, R H Hruban4, E S Zinreich1, D Fadaei Fouladi1, S Shayesteh1, J Graves1, S Kawamoto5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report procedures developed to annotate abdominal computed tomography (CT) images from subjects without pancreatic disease that will be used as the input for deep convolutional neural networks (DNN) for development of deep learning algorithms for automatic recognition of a normal pancreas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dual-phase contrast-enhanced volumetric CT acquired from 2005 to 2009 from potential kidney donors were retrospectively assessed. Four trained human annotators manually and sequentially annotated 22 structures in each datasets, then expert radiologists confirmed the annotation. For efficient annotation and data management, a commercial software package that supports three-dimensional segmentation was used.
RESULTS: A total of 1150 dual-phase CT datasets from 575 subjects were annotated. There were 229 men and 346 women (mean age: 45±12years; range: 18-79years). The mean intra-observer intra-subject dual-phase CT volume difference of all annotated structures was 4.27mL (7.65%). The deep network prediction for multi-organ segmentation showed high fidelity with 89.4% and 1.29mm in terms of mean Dice similarity coefficients and mean surface distances, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A reliable data collection/annotation process for abdominal structures was developed. This process can be used to generate large datasets appropriate for deep learning.
Copyright © 2019 Société française de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal computed tomography (CT); Artificial intelligence (AI); Image segmentation; Machine learning; Normal structures

Year:  2019        PMID: 31358460     DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging        ISSN: 2211-5684            Impact factor:   4.026


  10 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response.

Authors:  Bradley Spieler; Carl Sabottke; Ahmed W Moawad; Ahmed M Gabr; Mustafa R Bashir; Richard Kinh Gian Do; Vahid Yaghmai; Radu Rozenberg; Marielia Gerena; Joseph Yacoub; Khaled M Elsayes
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence: a critical review of current applications in pancreatic imaging.

Authors:  Maxime Barat; Guillaume Chassagnon; Anthony Dohan; Sébastien Gaujoux; Romain Coriat; Christine Hoeffel; Christophe Cassinotto; Philippe Soyer
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  CT and MRI of pancreatic tumors: an update in the era of radiomics.

Authors:  Marion Bartoli; Maxime Barat; Anthony Dohan; Sébastien Gaujoux; Romain Coriat; Christine Hoeffel; Christophe Cassinotto; Guillaume Chassagnon; Philippe Soyer
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Learning rate of students detecting and annotating pediatric wrist fractures in supervised artificial intelligence dataset preparations.

Authors:  Eszter Nagy; Robert Marterer; Franko Hržić; Erich Sorantin; Sebastian Tschauner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  EASY-APP: An artificial intelligence model and application for early and easy prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Balázs Kui; József Pintér; Roland Molontay; Marcell Nagy; Nelli Farkas; Noémi Gede; Áron Vincze; Judit Bajor; Szilárd Gódi; József Czimmer; Imre Szabó; Anita Illés; Patrícia Sarlós; Roland Hágendorn; Gabriella Pár; Mária Papp; Zsuzsanna Vitális; György Kovács; Eszter Fehér; Ildikó Földi; Ferenc Izbéki; László Gajdán; Roland Fejes; Balázs Csaba Németh; Imola Török; Hunor Farkas; Artautas Mickevicius; Ville Sallinen; Shamil Galeev; Elena Ramírez-Maldonado; Andrea Párniczky; Bálint Erőss; Péter Jenő Hegyi; Katalin Márta; Szilárd Váncsa; Robert Sutton; Peter Szatmary; Diane Latawiec; Chris Halloran; Enrique de-Madaria; Elizabeth Pando; Piero Alberti; Maria José Gómez-Jurado; Alina Tantau; Andrea Szentesi; Péter Hegyi
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

6.  Segmentation evaluation with sparse ground truth data: Simulating true segmentations as perfect/imperfect as those generated by humans.

Authors:  Jieyu Li; Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; Lisheng Wang; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 7.  The genetics of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the year 2020: dramatic progress, but far to go.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Thompson; Nicholas J Roberts; Laura D Wood; James R Eshleman; Michael G Goggins; Scott E Kern; Alison P Klein; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Machine learning based tissue analysis reveals Brachyury has a diagnosis value in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kaichun Li; Qiaoyun Wang; Yanyan Lu; Xiaorong Pan; Long Liu; Shiyu Cheng; Bingxiang Wu; Zongchang Song; Wei Gao
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 9.  Application of artificial intelligence to pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Ruibiao Fu; Qian Shao; Yan Chen; Qinghuang Ye; Sheng Li; Xiongxiong He; Jinhui Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 10.  Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance and Artificial Intelligence: Frontiers of Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  José S Enriquez; Yan Chu; Shivanand Pudakalakatti; Kang Lin Hsieh; Duncan Salmon; Prasanta Dutta; Niki Zacharias Millward; Eugene Lurie; Steven Millward; Florencia McAllister; Anirban Maitra; Subrata Sen; Ann Killary; Jian Zhang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Pratip K Bhattacharya; Shayan Shams
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-06-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.