Literature DB >> 33588116

Segmentation evaluation with sparse ground truth data: Simulating true segmentations as perfect/imperfect as those generated by humans.

Jieyu Li1, Jayaram K Udupa2, Yubing Tong3, Lisheng Wang4, Drew A Torigian3.   

Abstract

Fully annotated data sets play important roles in medical image segmentation and evaluation. Expense and imprecision are the two main issues in generating ground truth (GT) segmentations. In this paper, in an attempt to overcome these two issues jointly, we propose a method, named SparseGT, which exploit variability among human segmenters to maximally save manual workload in GT generation for evaluating actual segmentations by algorithms. Pseudo ground truth (p-GT) segmentations are created by only a small fraction of workload and with human-level perfection/imperfection, and they can be used in practice as a substitute for fully manual GT in evaluating segmentation algorithms at the same precision. p-GT segmentations are generated by first selecting slices sparsely, where manual contouring is conducted only on these sparse slices, and subsequently filling segmentations on other slices automatically. By creating p-GT with different levels of sparseness, we determine the largest workload reduction achievable for each considered object, where the variability of the generated p-GT is statistically indistinguishable from inter-segmenter differences in full manual GT segmentations for that object. Furthermore, we investigate the segmentation evaluation errors introduced by variability in manual GT by applying p-GT in evaluation of actual segmentations by an algorithm. Experiments are conducted on ∼500 computed tomography (CT) studies involving six objects in two body regions, Head & Neck and Thorax, where optimal sparseness and corresponding evaluation errors are determined for each object and each strategy. Our results indicate that creating p-GT by the concatenated strategy of uniformly selecting sparse slices and filling segmentations via deep-learning (DL) network show highest manual workload reduction by ∼80-96% without sacrificing evaluation accuracy compared to fully manual GT. Nevertheless, other strategies also have obvious contributions in different situations. A non-uniform strategy for slice selection shows its advantage for objects with irregular shape change from slice to slice. An interpolation strategy for filling segmentations can achieve ∼60-90% of workload reduction in simulating human-level GT without the need of an actual training stage and shows potential in enlarging data sets for training p-GT generation networks. We conclude that not only over 90% reduction in workload is feasible without sacrificing evaluation accuracy but also the suitable strategy and the optimal sparseness level achievable for creating p-GT are object- and application-specific.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ground truth generation; Inter-segmenter variability; Medical image segmentation; Segmentation evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33588116      PMCID: PMC7933105          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.101980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  36 in total

1.  Shape-based interpolation of multidimensional objects.

Authors:  S P Raya; J K Udupa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Evaluation of uterine cervix segmentations using ground truth from multiple experts.

Authors:  Shiri Gordon; Shelly Lotenberg; Rodney Long; Sameer Antani; Jose Jeronimo; Hayit Greenspan
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  A convolutional neural network algorithm for automatic segmentation of head and neck organs at risk using deep lifelong learning.

Authors:  Jason W Chan; Vasant Kearney; Samuel Haaf; Susan Wu; Madeleine Bogdanov; Mariah Reddick; Nayha Dixit; Atchar Sudhyadhom; Josephine Chen; Sue S Yom; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Vision 20/20: perspectives on automated image segmentation for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gregory Sharp; Karl D Fritscher; Vladimir Pekar; Marta Peroni; Nadya Shusharina; Harini Veeraraghavan; Jinzhong Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Automatic Segmentation of MR Brain Images With a Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Pim Moeskops; Max A Viergever; Adrienne M Mendrik; Linda S de Vries; Manon J N L Benders; Ivana Isgum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  An Empirical Study Into Annotator Agreement, Ground Truth Estimation, and Algorithm Evaluation.

Authors:  Thomas A Lampert; Andre Stumpf; Pierre Gancarski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 10.856

7.  Shape constrained fully convolutional DenseNet with adversarial training for multiorgan segmentation on head and neck CT and low-field MR images.

Authors:  Nuo Tong; Shuiping Gou; Shuyuan Yang; Minsong Cao; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  AAR-RT - A system for auto-contouring organs at risk on CT images for radiation therapy planning: Principles, design, and large-scale evaluation on head-and-neck and thoracic cancer cases.

Authors:  Xingyu Wu; Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; Dewey Odhner; Gargi V Pednekar; Charles B Simone; David McLaughlin; Chavanon Apinorasethkul; Ontida Apinorasethkul; John Lukens; Dimitris Mihailidis; Geraldine Shammo; Paul James; Akhil Tiwari; Lisa Wojtowicz; Joseph Camaratta; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Body-wide hierarchical fuzzy modeling, recognition, and delineation of anatomy in medical images.

Authors:  Jayaram K Udupa; Dewey Odhner; Liming Zhao; Yubing Tong; Monica M S Matsumoto; Krzysztof C Ciesielski; Alexandre X Falcao; Pavithra Vaideeswaran; Victoria Ciesielski; Babak Saboury; Syedmehrdad Mohammadianrasanani; Sanghun Sin; Raanan Arens; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Interactive Medical Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning With Image-Specific Fine Tuning.

Authors:  Guotai Wang; Wenqi Li; Maria A Zuluaga; Rosalind Pratt; Premal A Patel; Michael Aertsen; Tom Doel; Anna L David; Jan Deprest; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  1 in total

1.  ID-Seg: an infant deep learning-based segmentation framework to improve limbic structure estimates.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Fateme Sadat Haghpanah; Xuzhe Zhang; Katie Santamaria; Gabriela Koch da Costa Aguiar Alves; Elizabeth Bruno; Natalie Aw; Alexis Maddocks; Cristiane S Duarte; Catherine Monk; Andrew Laine; Jonathan Posner
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2022-05-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.