Literature DB >> 31335650

OPRM1 rs1799971, COMT rs4680, and FAAH rs324420 genes interact with placebo procedures to induce hypoalgesia.

Luana Colloca1,2,3, Yang Wang1,3, Pedro E Martinez4, Yen-Pei C Chang5, Kathleen A Ryan5, Colin Hodgkinson6, David Goldman6, Susan G Dorsey1,2,3.   

Abstract

Genetics studies on the placebo hypoalgesic effect highlight a promising link between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the dopamine, opioid, and endocannabinoid genes and placebo hypoalgesia. However, epistasis and replication studies are missing. In this study, we expanded on previous findings related to the 3 SNPs in the opioid receptor mu subunit (OPRM1 rs1799971), catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT rs4680), and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH rs324420) genes associated with placebo hypoalgesia and tested the effect of a 3-way interaction on placebo hypoalgesia. Using 2 well-established placebo procedures (verbal suggestion and learning paradigm), we induced significant placebo hypoalgesic effects in 160 healthy participants. We found that individuals with OPRM1 AA combined with FAAH Pro/Pro and those carrying COMT met/met together with FAAH Pro/Pro showed significant placebo effects. Participants with COMT met/val alleles showed significant placebo effects independently of OPRM1 and FAAH allele combinations. Finally, the model that included the placebo procedure and genotypes predicted placebo responsiveness with a higher accuracy (area under the curve, AUC = 0.773) as compared to the SNPs alone indicating that genetic variants can only partially explain the placebo responder status. Our results suggest that the endogenous mu-opioid system with a larger activation in response to pain in the met/val allele carriers as well as the synergism between endogenous mu-opioid system and cannabinoids might play the most relevant role in driving hypoalgesic responses. Future epistasis studies with larger sample sizes will help us to fully understand the complexity of placebo effects and explain the mechanisms that underlie placebo responsiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31335650      PMCID: PMC6668362          DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   7.926


  61 in total

1.  An investigation of the placebo effect and age-related factors in the report of needle pain from venipuncture in children.

Authors:  B Goodenough; L Kampel; G D Champion; L Laubreaux; M K Nicholas; J B Ziegler; M McInerney
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  The Placebo Effect in Pain Therapies.

Authors:  Luana Colloca
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 13.820

3.  Factors contributing to large analgesic effects in placebo mechanism studies conducted between 2002 and 2007.

Authors:  Lene Vase; Gitte Laue Petersen; Joseph L Riley; Donald D Price
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Over a decade of neuroimaging studies of placebo analgesia in humans: what is next?

Authors:  M Peciña; J-K Zubieta
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 15.992

5.  Polymorphism of Opioid Receptors μ1 in Highly Hypnotizable Subjects.

Authors:  Silvano Presciuttini; Michele Curcio; Rosalia Sciarrino; Fabrizio Scatena; Mark P Jensen; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  Age and sex as moderators of the placebo response – an evaluation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses across medicine.

Authors:  Katja Weimer; Luana Colloca; Paul Enck
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.140

7.  Placebo analgesia and reward processing: integrating genetics, personality, and intrinsic brain activity.

Authors:  Rongjun Yu; Randy L Gollub; Mark Vangel; Ted Kaptchuk; Jordan W Smoller; Jian Kong
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Neuropharmacological dissection of placebo analgesia: expectation-activated opioid systems versus conditioning-activated specific subsystems.

Authors:  M Amanzio; F Benedetti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Heritability of spinal pain and consequences of spinal pain: a comprehensive genetic epidemiologic analysis using a population-based sample of 15,328 twins ages 20-71 years.

Authors:  Jan Hartvigsen; Jan Nielsen; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; Rene Fejer; Werner Vach; Ivan Iachine; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-10-15

10.  FAAH selectively influences placebo effects.

Authors:  M Peciña; M Martínez-Jauand; C Hodgkinson; C S Stohler; D Goldman; J K Zubieta
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  10 in total

1.  Prior Therapeutic Experiences, Not Expectation Ratings, Predict Placebo Effects: An Experimental Study in Chronic Pain and Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Titilola Akintola; Nathaniel R Haycock; Maxie Blasini; Sharon Thomas; Jane Phillips; Nicole Corsi; Lieven A Schenk; Yang Wang
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 17.659

2.  Who are the placebo responders? A cross-sectional cohort study for psychological determinants.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Esther Chan; Susan G Dorsey; Claudia M Campbell; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 7.926

3.  COMT Genotype and Efficacy of Propranolol for TMD Pain: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  G D Slade; R B Fillingim; R Ohrbach; H Hadgraft; J Willis; S J Arbes; I E Tchivileva
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Effects of placebo administration on immune mechanisms and relationships with central endogenous opioid neurotransmission.

Authors:  Alan Prossin; Alisa Koch; Phillip Campbell; Geoffroy Laumet; Christian S Stohler; Robert Dantzer; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 13.437

5.  Neural and behavioral changes driven by observationally-induced hypoalgesia.

Authors:  Nandini Raghuraman; Yang Wang; Lieven A Schenk; Andrew J Furman; Christina Tricou; David A Seminowicz; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Genetic susceptibility of opioid receptor genes polymorphism to drug addiction: A candidate-gene association study.

Authors:  Laith N Al-Eitan; Doaa M Rababa'h; Mansour A Alghamdi
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Effects of Mu-Opiate Receptor Gene Polymorphism rs1799971 (A118G) on the Antidepressant and Dissociation Responses in Esketamine Nasal Spray Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ziad Saad; Derrek Hibar; Maggie Fedgchin; Vanina Popova; Maura L Furey; Jaskaran B Singh; Hartmuth Kolb; Wayne C Drevets; Guang Chen
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.176

8.  Optimizing Aggregated N-Of-1 Trial Designs for Predictive Biomarker Validation: Statistical Methods and Theoretical Findings.

Authors:  Rebecca C Hendrickson; Ronald G Thomas; Nicholas J Schork; Murray A Raskind
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2020-08-28

9.  Are Individual Learning Experiences More Important Than Heritable Tendencies? A Pilot Twin Study on Placebo Analgesia.

Authors:  Katja Weimer; Elisabeth Hahn; Nils Mönnikes; Ann-Kathrin Herr; Andreas Stengel; Paul Enck
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Cutoff criteria for the placebo response: a cluster and machine learning analysis of placebo analgesia.

Authors:  Per M Aslaksen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.