Literature DB >> 34740998

Who are the placebo responders? A cross-sectional cohort study for psychological determinants.

Yang Wang1,2, Esther Chan1, Susan G Dorsey1,2,3, Claudia M Campbell4, Luana Colloca1,2,5.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: A number of studies have demonstrated substantial individual differences in placebo effects. We aimed to identify individual psychological factors that potentially predicted the magnitude of placebo hypoalgesia and individual responsiveness. The Research Domain Criteria framework and a classical conditioning with suggestions paradigm were adopted as experimental models to study placebo phenotypes in a cohort of 397 chronic pain participants with a primary diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and 397 healthy control (HC) participants. The magnitude of placebo hypoalgesia was operationalized as the average difference in pain ratings between the placebo and control conditions. The individual placebo responsiveness was identified as the status of placebo responders and nonresponders based on a permutation test. We observed significant placebo effects in both TMD and HC participants. A greater level of emotional distress was a significant predictor of smaller magnitude (slope b = -0.07) and slower extinction rate (slope b = 0.51) of placebo effects in both TMD and HC participants. Greater reward seeking was linked to greater postconditioning expectations (ie, reinforced expectations) in TMD (slope b = 0.16), but there was no such a prediction in HC participants. These findings highlight that negative valence systems might play a role in impairing placebo effects, with a larger impact in chronic pain participants than in healthy participants, suggesting that individuals reporting emotional distress and maladaptive cognitive appraisals of pain may benefit less from placebo effects.
Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34740998      PMCID: PMC8907332          DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   7.926


  60 in total

1.  Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: the NIMH Research Domain Criteria project.

Authors:  Bruce N Cuthbert; Thomas R Insel
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought.

Authors:  Donald D Price; Damien G Finniss; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

4.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

5.  Neuroticism is a fundamental domain of personality with enormous public health implications.

Authors:  Thomas A Widiger; Joshua R Oltmanns
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 49.548

6.  Exploring the factor structure of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ).

Authors:  E Keogh; J Reidy
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2000-02

7.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

Review 8.  New evidence for a pain personality? A critical review of the last 120 years of pain and personality.

Authors:  Brooke Naylor; Simon Boag; Sylvia Maria Gustin
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2017-07-28

9.  Method for quantitative estimation of thermal thresholds in patients.

Authors:  H Fruhstorfer; U Lindblom; W C Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 10.  Endogenous opioid system dysregulation in depression: implications for new therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Marta Peciña; Jordan F Karp; Sanjay Mathew; Mark S Todtenkopf; Elliot W Ehrich; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  2 in total

1.  Do individual psychological characteristics predict induction and generalization of nocebo and placebo effects on pain and itch?

Authors:  Lingling Weng; Antoinette I M van Laarhoven; Kaya J Peerdeman; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  Editorial: Harnessing placebo mechanisms.

Authors:  Chamindi Seneviratne; Jason Noel; Patricia D Franklin; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 5.435

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.