Literature DB >> 24578196

Placebo analgesia and reward processing: integrating genetics, personality, and intrinsic brain activity.

Rongjun Yu1, Randy L Gollub, Mark Vangel, Ted Kaptchuk, Jordan W Smoller, Jian Kong.   

Abstract

Our expectations about an event can strongly shape our subjective evaluation and actual experience of events. This ability, applied to the modulation of pain, has the potential to affect therapeutic analgesia substantially and constitutes a foundation for non-pharmacological pain relief. A typical example of such modulation is the placebo effect. Studies indicate that placebo may be regarded as a reward, and brain activity in the reward system is involved in this modulation process. In the present study, we combined resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) measures, genotype at a functional COMT polymorphism (Val158Met), and personality measures in a model to predict the magnitude of placebo conditioning effect indicated by subjective pain rating reduction to calibrated noxious stimuli. We found that the regional homogeneity (ReHo), an index of local neural coherence, in the ventral striatum, was significantly associated with conditioning effects on pain rating changes. We also found that the number of Met alleles at the COMT polymorphism was linearly correlated to the suppression of pain. In a fitted regression model, we found the ReHo in the ventral striatum, COMT genotype, and Openness scores accounted for 59% of the variance in the change in pain ratings. The model was further tested using a separate data set from the same study. Our findings demonstrate the potential of combining resting-state connectivity, genetic information, and personality to predict placebo effect.
Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conditioning; fMRI; placebo analgesia; regional homogeneity; resting state

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24578196      PMCID: PMC4107077          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  86 in total

1.  Opponent appetitive-aversive neural processes underlie predictive learning of pain relief.

Authors:  Ben Seymour; John P O'Doherty; Martin Koltzenburg; Katja Wiech; Richard Frackowiak; Karl Friston; Raymond Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-21       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Dispositional optimism predicts placebo analgesia.

Authors:  Andrew L Geers; Justin A Wellman; Stephanie L Fowler; Suzanne G Helfer; Christopher R France
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Personality trait predictors of placebo analgesia and neurobiological correlates.

Authors:  Marta Peciña; Hamdan Azhar; Tiffany M Love; Tingting Lu; Barbara L Fredrickson; Christian S Stohler; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Validity and sensitivity of ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors: manipulation of affect by diazepam.

Authors:  R H Gracely; P McGrath; R Dubner
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Nonconscious activation of placebo and nocebo pain responses.

Authors:  Karin B Jensen; Ted J Kaptchuk; Irving Kirsch; Jacqueline Raicek; Kara M Lindstrom; Chantal Berna; Randy L Gollub; Martin Ingvar; Jian Kong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Increased placebo analgesia over time in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients is associated with desire and expectation but not endogenous opioid mechanisms.

Authors:  Lene Vase; Michael E Robinson; G Nicholas Verne; Donald D Price
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Brain networks predicting placebo analgesia in a clinical trial for chronic back pain.

Authors:  Javeria A Hashmi; Alex T Baria; Marwan N Baliki; Lejian Huang; Thomas J Schnitzer; Vania A Apkarian
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination in boys.

Authors:  A Taddio; M Goldbach; M Ipp; B Stevens; G Koren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-02-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Conditioning and hyperalgesia in newborns exposed to repeated heel lances.

Authors:  Anna Taddio; Vibhuti Shah; Cheryl Gilbert-MacLeod; Joel Katz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  COMT val158met polymorphism and neural pain processing.

Authors:  Christian Schmahl; Petra Ludäscher; Wolfgang Greffrath; Anja Kraus; Gabriele Valerius; Thomas G Schulze; Jens Treutlein; Marcella Rietschel; Michael N Smolka; Martin Bohus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  The placebo effect: From concepts to genes.

Authors:  B Colagiuri; L A Schenk; M D Kessler; S G Dorsey; L Colloca
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Between placebo and nocebo: Response to control treatment is mediated by amygdala activity and connectivity.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Fabrizio Benedetti; Randy L Gollub; Jian Kong
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Systems pharmacogenomics - gene, disease, drug and placebo interactions: a case study in COMT.

Authors:  Kathryn T Hall; Joseph Loscalzo; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 4.  Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: A dual-process model informed by insights from cross-species comparisons.

Authors:  Scott M Schafer; Stephan Geuter; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  A Functional Neuroimaging Study of Expectancy Effects on Pain Response in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Randy L Gollub; Irving Kirsch; Nasim Maleki; Ajay D Wasan; Robert R Edwards; Yiheng Tu; Ted J Kaptchuk; Jian Kong
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  In the face of pain: The choice of visual cues in pain conditioning matters.

Authors:  N Egorova; J Park; J Kong
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 7.  Age and sex as moderators of the placebo response – an evaluation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses across medicine.

Authors:  Katja Weimer; Luana Colloca; Paul Enck
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 8.  Genetics and the placebo effect: the placebome.

Authors:  Kathryn T Hall; Joseph Loscalzo; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 11.951

9.  Network analysis of the genomic basis of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Rui-Sheng Wang; Kathryn T Hall; Franco Giulianini; Dani Passow; Ted J Kaptchuk; Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-06-02

10.  A neural mechanism of direct and observational conditioning for placebo and nocebo responses.

Authors:  Yiheng Tu; Joel Park; Seppo P Ahlfors; Sheraz Khan; Natalia Egorova; Courtney Lang; Jin Cao; Jian Kong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.