Literature DB >> 19559529

Factors contributing to large analgesic effects in placebo mechanism studies conducted between 2002 and 2007.

Lene Vase1, Gitte Laue Petersen, Joseph L Riley, Donald D Price.   

Abstract

Recent meta-analyses find various magnitudes of placebo analgesia effects in placebo mechanism trials versus placebo control trials, which have led to debate. To further investigate the magnitude of placebo analgesia in placebo mechanism trials the databases "PubMed", "PsycINFO" and "Web of Science" (2002-2007) were searched with the term "placebo analgesia". Twenty-one articles including 24 studies fulfilled the selection criteria (concerning: mechanisms, control, placebo treatment, randomization and pain measures). The validity of studies was assessed by the authors and effect sizes were calculated via difference scores. The magnitude of placebo analgesia in placebo mechanism studies was large (d=1.00) and about five times larger than placebo analgesia effects in placebo control studies (d=0.15-0.27). Differences in magnitude between the two types of studies appear to result from different types of suggestions given for pain relief. The magnitude of placebo effects was larger in studies that used long-term pain stimuli >20s (d=0.96) as opposed to short-term stimuli (d=0.81) and the largest placebo effects were found in studies wherein hyperalgesia was present (d=1.88). These results replicate our previous finding that placebo analgesic effects are higher in mechanism studies than in placebo control studies. However, since magnitudes of placebo analgesic effects are highly variable it may be valuable to investigate the factors and mechanisms that contribute to this variability as well as differences in magnitudes across types of studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19559529     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  52 in total

Review 1.  [Placebo responders in randomized controlled drug trials of fibromyalgia syndrome : Systematic review and meta-analysis].

Authors:  W Häuser; E Bartram-Wunn; C Bartram; T R Tölle
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Placebo response to manual therapy: something out of nothing?

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

3.  Expectations contribute to reduced pain levels during prayer in highly religious participants.

Authors:  Else-Marie Elmholdt Jegindø; Lene Vase; Joshua Charles Skewes; Astrid Juhl Terkelsen; John Hansen; Armin W Geertz; Andreas Roepstorff; Troels Staehelin Jensen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-07-07

Review 4.  [Mechanisms of endogenous pain modulation illustrated by placebo analgesia : functional imaging findings].

Authors:  U Bingel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-30

Review 6.  Mechanisms and clinical implications of the placebo effect: is there a potential for the elderly? A mini-review.

Authors:  Ulrike Bingel; Luana Colloca; Lene Vase
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 5.140

7.  The Placebo Effect in Pain Therapies.

Authors:  Luana Colloca
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 13.820

8.  Placebo Effects on the Neurologic Pain Signature: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Matthias Zunhammer; Ulrike Bingel; Tor D Wager
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 9.  Clinical Use of Placebo Effects in Patients With Pain Disorders.

Authors:  Regine Klinger; Julia Stuhlreyer; Marie Schwartz; Julia Schmitz; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.230

10.  Innovative treatment of clinically diagnosed meniscal tears: a randomized sham-controlled trial of the Mulligan concept 'squeeze' technique.

Authors:  Robinetta Hudson; Amy Richmond; Belinda Sanchez; Valerie Stevenson; Russell T Baker; James May; Alan Nasypany; Don Reordan
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.