Hong-Jie Dai1,2, Chu-Hsien Su3, Chi-Shin Wu3. 1. Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 3. Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: An adverse drug event (ADE) refers to an injury resulting from medical intervention related to a drug including harm caused by drugs or from the usage of drugs. Extracting ADEs from clinical records can help physicians associate adverse events to targeted drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We proposed a cascading architecture to recognize medical concepts including ADEs, drug names, and entities related to drugs. The architecture includes a preprocessing method and an ensemble of conditional random fields (CRFs) and neural network-based models to respectively address the challenges of surrogate string and overlapping annotation boundaries observed in the employed ADEs and medication extraction (ADME) corpus. The effectiveness of applying different pretrained and postprocessed word embeddings for the ADME task was also studied. RESULTS: The empirical results showed that both CRFs and neural network-based models provide promising solution for the ADME task. The neural network-based models particularly outperformed CRFs in concept types involving narrative descriptions. Our best run achieved an overall micro F-score of 0.919 on the employed corpus. Our results also suggested that the Global Vectors for word representation embedding in general domain provides a very strong baseline, which can be further improved by applying the principal component analysis to generate more isotropic vectors. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the proposed cascading architecture can handle the problem of overlapped annotations and further improve the overall recall and F-scores because the architecture enables the developed models to exploit more context information and forms an ensemble for creating a stronger recognizer.
OBJECTIVE: An adverse drug event (ADE) refers to an injury resulting from medical intervention related to a drug including harm caused by drugs or from the usage of drugs. Extracting ADEs from clinical records can help physicians associate adverse events to targeted drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We proposed a cascading architecture to recognize medical concepts including ADEs, drug names, and entities related to drugs. The architecture includes a preprocessing method and an ensemble of conditional random fields (CRFs) and neural network-based models to respectively address the challenges of surrogate string and overlapping annotation boundaries observed in the employed ADEs and medication extraction (ADME) corpus. The effectiveness of applying different pretrained and postprocessed word embeddings for the ADME task was also studied. RESULTS: The empirical results showed that both CRFs and neural network-based models provide promising solution for the ADME task. The neural network-based models particularly outperformed CRFs in concept types involving narrative descriptions. Our best run achieved an overall micro F-score of 0.919 on the employed corpus. Our results also suggested that the Global Vectors for word representation embedding in general domain provides a very strong baseline, which can be further improved by applying the principal component analysis to generate more isotropic vectors. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the proposed cascading architecture can handle the problem of overlapped annotations and further improve the overall recall and F-scores because the architecture enables the developed models to exploit more context information and forms an ensemble for creating a stronger recognizer.
Authors: D W Bates; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; D Servi; G Laffel; B J Sweitzer; B F Shea; R Hallisey Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Foster R Goss; Li Zhou; Joseph M Plasek; Carol Broverman; George Robinson; Blackford Middleton; Roberto A Rocha Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-02-09 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: L L Leape; D W Bates; D J Cullen; J Cooper; H J Demonaco; T Gallivan; R Hallisey; J Ives; N Laird; G Laffel Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alistair E W Johnson; Tom J Pollard; Lu Shen; Li-Wei H Lehman; Mengling Feng; Mohammad Ghassemi; Benjamin Moody; Peter Szolovits; Leo Anthony Celi; Roger G Mark Journal: Sci Data Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Marco Spruit; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Klaske R Siegersma; Maxime Evers; Sophie H Bots; Floor Groepenhoff; Yolande Appelman; Leonard Hofstra; Igor I Tulevski; G Aernout Somsen; Hester M den Ruijter Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2022-01-25