Literature DB >> 7791255

Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.

D W Bates1, D J Cullen, N Laird, L A Petersen, S D Small, D Servi, G Laffel, B J Sweitzer, B F Shea, R Hallisey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess incidence and preventability of adverse drug events (ADEs) and potential ADEs. To analyze preventable events to develop prevention strategies.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All 4031 adult admissions to a stratified random sample of 11 medical and surgical units in two tertiary care hospitals over a 6-month period. Units included two medical and three surgical intensive care units and four medical and two surgical general care units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse drug events and potential ADEs.
METHODS: Incidents were detected by stimulated self-report by nurses and pharmacists and by daily review of all charts by nurse investigators. Incidents were subsequently classified by two independent reviewers as to whether they represented ADEs or potential ADEs and as to severity and preventability.
RESULTS: Over 6 months, 247 ADEs and 194 potential ADEs were identified. Extrapolated event rates were 6.5 ADEs and 5.5 potential ADEs per 100 nonobstetrical admissions, for mean numbers per hospital per year of approximately 1900 ADEs and 1600 potential ADEs. Of all ADEs, 1% were fatal (none preventable), 12% life-threatening, 30% serious, and 57% significant. Twenty-eight percent were judged preventable. Of the life-threatening and serious ADEs, 42% were preventable, compared with 18% of significant ADEs. Errors resulting in preventable ADEs occurred most often at the stages of ordering (56%) and administration (34%); transcription (6%) and dispensing errors (4%) were less common. Errors were much more likely to be intercepted if the error occurred earlier in the process: 48% at the ordering stage vs 0% at the administration stage.
CONCLUSION: Adverse drug events were common and often preventable; serious ADEs were more likely to be preventable. Most resulted from errors at the ordering stage, but many also occurred at the administration stage. Prevention strategies should target both stages of the drug delivery process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7791255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  691 in total

1.  Notification of real-time clinical alerts generated by pharmacy expert systems.

Authors:  J E Miller; R M Reichley; L A McNamee; S A Steib; T C Bailey
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Setting up a database of medical error in general practice: conceptual and methodological considerations.

Authors:  A Sheikh; B Hurwitz
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Reducing errors in medicine.

Authors:  D M Berwick; L L Leape
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-17

4.  A conversation on medical injury.

Authors:  L L Leape; D S Swankin; M R Yessian
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  A national database of medical error.

Authors:  A Sheikh; B Hurwitz
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Drug interactions avoided-a useful indicator of good prescribing practice.

Authors:  D Williams; A Kelly; J Feely
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Incidence and types of preventable adverse events in elderly patients: population based review of medical records.

Authors:  E J Thomas; T A Brennan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

8.  Let's talk about error.

Authors:  J L Reinertsen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

9.  System changes to improve patient safety.

Authors:  T W Nolan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

10.  Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals.

Authors:  D W Bates
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.