Alex V Rowlands1,2,3, Stuart J Fairclough4, Tom Yates1,2, Charlotte L Edwardson1,2, Melanie Davies1,2, Fehmidah Munir5, Kamlesh Khunti1,2,6, Victoria H Stiles7. 1. Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UNITED KINGDOM. 2. NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UNITED KINGDOM. 3. Division of Health Sciences, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, AUSTRALIA. 4. Movement Behaviours, Health, and Wellbeing Research Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UNITED KINGDOM. 5. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UNITED KINGDOM. 6. NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, Leicester General Hospital, UNITED KINGDOM. 7. Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UNITED KINGDOM.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The physical activity profile can be described from accelerometer data using two population-independent metrics: average acceleration (ACC, volume) and intensity gradient (IG, intensity). This article aims 1) to demonstrate how these metrics can be used to investigate the relative contributions of volume and intensity of physical activity for a range of health markers across data sets and 2) to illustrate the future potential of the metrics for generation of age and sex-specific percentile norms. METHODS: Secondary data analyses were conducted on five diverse data sets using wrist-worn accelerometers (ActiGraph/GENEActiv/Axivity): children (n = 145), adolescent girls (n = 1669), office workers (n = 114), premenopausal (n = 1218) and postmenopausal (n = 1316) women, and adults with type 2 diabetes (n = 475). Open-source software (GGIR) was used to generate ACC and IG. Health markers were (a) zBMI (children), (b) %fat (adolescent girls and adults), (c) bone health (pre- and postmenopausal women), and (d) physical function (adults with type 2 diabetes). RESULTS: Multiple regression analyses showed that IG, but not ACC, was independently associated with zBMI/%fat in children and adolescents. In adults, associations were stronger and the effects of ACC and IG were additive. For bone health and physical function, interactions showed associations were strongest if IG was high, largely irrespective of ACC. Exemplar illustrative percentile "norms" showed the expected age-related decline in physical activity, with greater drops in IG across age than ACC. CONCLUSION: The ACC and the IG accelerometer metrics facilitate the investigation of whether volume and intensity of physical activity have independent, additive, or interactive effects on health markers. In future studies, the adoption of data-driven metrics would facilitate the generation of age- and sex-specific norms that would be beneficial to researchers.
PURPOSE: The physical activity profile can be described from accelerometer data using two population-independent metrics: average acceleration (ACC, volume) and intensity gradient (IG, intensity). This article aims 1) to demonstrate how these metrics can be used to investigate the relative contributions of volume and intensity of physical activity for a range of health markers across data sets and 2) to illustrate the future potential of the metrics for generation of age and sex-specific percentile norms. METHODS: Secondary data analyses were conducted on five diverse data sets using wrist-worn accelerometers (ActiGraph/GENEActiv/Axivity): children (n = 145), adolescent girls (n = 1669), office workers (n = 114), premenopausal (n = 1218) and postmenopausal (n = 1316) women, and adults with type 2 diabetes (n = 475). Open-source software (GGIR) was used to generate ACC and IG. Health markers were (a) zBMI (children), (b) %fat (adolescent girls and adults), (c) bone health (pre- and postmenopausal women), and (d) physical function (adults with type 2 diabetes). RESULTS: Multiple regression analyses showed that IG, but not ACC, was independently associated with zBMI/%fat in children and adolescents. In adults, associations were stronger and the effects of ACC and IG were additive. For bone health and physical function, interactions showed associations were strongest if IG was high, largely irrespective of ACC. Exemplar illustrative percentile "norms" showed the expected age-related decline in physical activity, with greater drops in IG across age than ACC. CONCLUSION: The ACC and the IG accelerometer metrics facilitate the investigation of whether volume and intensity of physical activity have independent, additive, or interactive effects on health markers. In future studies, the adoption of data-driven metrics would facilitate the generation of age- and sex-specific norms that would be beneficial to researchers.
Authors: Alex V Rowlands; Nathan P Dawkins; Ben Maylor; Charlotte L Edwardson; Stuart J Fairclough; Melanie J Davies; Deirdre M Harrington; Kamlesh Khunti; Tom Yates Journal: Sports Med Open Date: 2019-12-05
Authors: Alex V Rowlands; Joseph J Henson; Nicole A Coull; Charlotte L Edwardson; Emer Brady; Andrew Hall; Kamlesh Khunti; Melanie Davies; Tom Yates Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 4.213
Authors: Tomas Vetrovsky; Dan Omcirk; Jan Malecek; Petr Stastny; Michal Steffl; James J Tufano Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Alex V Rowlands; Paddy C Dempsey; Clare Gillies; David E Kloecker; Cameron Razieh; Yogini Chudasama; Nazrul Islam; Francesco Zaccardi; Claire Lawson; Tom Norris; Melanie J Davies; Kamlesh Khunti; Tom Yates Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2021-08-20
Authors: Jan Dygrýn; María Medrano; Pablo Molina-Garcia; Lukáš Rubín; Lukáš Jakubec; David Janda; Aleš Gába Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 3.674
Authors: Anne Backes; Tripti Gupta; Susanne Schmitz; Guy Fagherazzi; Vincent van Hees; Laurent Malisoux Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 4.645
Authors: Joseph Henson; Alex V Rowlands; Emma Baldry; Emer M Brady; Melanie J Davies; Charlotte L Edwardson; Thomas Yates; Andrew P Hall Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-07
Authors: Timo Rantalainen; Nicola D Ridgers; Ying Gao; Daniel L Belavý; Eero A Haapala; Taija Finni Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 3.078