Tomas Vetrovsky1, Dan Omcirk2, Jan Malecek2, Petr Stastny3, Michal Steffl2, James J Tufano2. 1. Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Jose Martiho 269/31, 162 52, Prague, Czech Republic. tomas.vetrovsky@gmail.com. 2. Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Jose Martiho 269/31, 162 52, Prague, Czech Republic. 3. Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exercise training is crucial for maintaining physical and mental health in aging populations. However, as people participate in structured exercise training, they tend to behaviorally compensate by decreasing their non-exercise physical activity, thus potentially blunting the benefits of the training program. Furthermore, physical activity of older adults is substantially influenced by physical feelings such as fatigue. Nevertheless, how older people react to day-to-day fluctuations of fatigue and whether fatigue plays a role in non-exercise physical activity compensation is not known. Thus, the purpose of this study was twofold: (1) To explore whether the volume and intensity of habitual physical activity in older adults were affected by morning fatigue. (2) To investigate the effect of attending power and resistance exercise sessions on the levels of non-exercise physical activity later that day and the following day. METHODS: Twenty-eight older adults wore an accelerometer during a 4-week low-volume, low-intensity resistance and power training program with three exercise sessions per week and for 3 weeks preceding and 1 week following the program. During the same period, the participants were prompted every morning, using text messages, to rate their momentary fatigue on a scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS: Greater morning fatigue was associated with lower volume (p = 0.002) and intensity (p = 0.017) of daily physical activity. Specifically, one point greater on the fatigue scale was associated with 3.2 min (SE 1.0) less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Furthermore, attending an exercise session was associated with less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity later that day by 3.7 min (SE 1.9, p = 0.049) compared to days without an exercise session. During the next day, the volume of physical activity was greater, but only in participants with a body mass index up to 23 (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Following low-volume exercise sessions, fit and healthy older adults decreased their non-exercise physical activity later that day, but this compensation did not carry over into the next day. As momentary morning fatigue negatively affects daily physical activity, we suggest that the state level of fatigue should be monitored during intensive exercise programs, especially in less fit older adults with increased fatigability.
BACKGROUND: Exercise training is crucial for maintaining physical and mental health in aging populations. However, as people participate in structured exercise training, they tend to behaviorally compensate by decreasing their non-exercise physical activity, thus potentially blunting the benefits of the training program. Furthermore, physical activity of older adults is substantially influenced by physical feelings such as fatigue. Nevertheless, how older people react to day-to-day fluctuations of fatigue and whether fatigue plays a role in non-exercise physical activity compensation is not known. Thus, the purpose of this study was twofold: (1) To explore whether the volume and intensity of habitual physical activity in older adults were affected by morning fatigue. (2) To investigate the effect of attending power and resistance exercise sessions on the levels of non-exercise physical activity later that day and the following day. METHODS: Twenty-eight older adults wore an accelerometer during a 4-week low-volume, low-intensity resistance and power training program with three exercise sessions per week and for 3 weeks preceding and 1 week following the program. During the same period, the participants were prompted every morning, using text messages, to rate their momentary fatigue on a scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS: Greater morning fatigue was associated with lower volume (p = 0.002) and intensity (p = 0.017) of daily physical activity. Specifically, one point greater on the fatigue scale was associated with 3.2 min (SE 1.0) less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Furthermore, attending an exercise session was associated with less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity later that day by 3.7 min (SE 1.9, p = 0.049) compared to days without an exercise session. During the next day, the volume of physical activity was greater, but only in participants with a body mass index up to 23 (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Following low-volume exercise sessions, fit and healthy older adults decreased their non-exercise physical activity later that day, but this compensation did not carry over into the next day. As momentary morning fatigue negatively affects daily physical activity, we suggest that the state level of fatigue should be monitored during intensive exercise programs, especially in less fit older adults with increased fatigability.
Authors: Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Marie Löf; Irene Esteban-Cornejo; Pablo Molina-Garcia; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Maria Rodriguez-Ayllon; Eduardo Garcia-Marmol; Ulf Ekelund; Francisco B Ortega Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Thorlene Egerton; Sebastien F M Chastin; Dorthe Stensvold; Jorunn L Helbostad Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Katrina L Piercy; Richard P Troiano; Rachel M Ballard; Susan A Carlson; Janet E Fulton; Deborah A Galuska; Stephanie M George; Richard D Olson Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: James J Tufano; Jan Malecek; Michal Steffl; Petr Stastny; Vladimir Hojka; Tomas Vetrovsky Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Louise Poppe; Annick L De Paepe; Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem; Delfien Van Dyck; Iris Maes; Geert Crombez Journal: PeerJ Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 2.984