| Literature DB >> 34118885 |
Jan Dygrýn1, María Medrano1, Pablo Molina-Garcia1, Lukáš Rubín1,2, Lukáš Jakubec1, David Janda1, Aleš Gába3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Further research is required to explore the associations between 24-h movement behaviours and health outcomes in the paediatric population. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the associations between novel data-driven 24-h activity metrics and adiposity among children and adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: Accelerometer; Body composition; Health; Measurement; Youth
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34118885 PMCID: PMC8199825 DOI: 10.1186/s12199-021-00987-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Prev Med ISSN: 1342-078X Impact factor: 3.674
Characteristics of all the participants, children, and adolescents and the differences between them
| All ( | Children ( | Adolescents ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 13.9 (2.8) | 11.7 (1.6) | 16.4 (1.3) | |
| Girls (% of | 56.2 | 56.2 | 55.9 | 0.866 |
| Height (cm) | 160.5 (14.2) | 151.6 (12.1) | 170.5 (8.7) | |
| Weight (kg) | 53.1 (15.4) | 43.8 (11.5) | 63.7 (12.0) | |
| BMI | 0.25 (1.09) | 0.27 (1.15) | 0.23 (1.02) | 0.691 |
| Overweight and obesity prevalence (% of | 23.6 | 25.4 | 21.6 | 0.231 |
| FM% | 20.1 (8.7) | 19.5 (8.2) | 20.7 (9.2) | 0.065 |
| Visceral adipose tissue (cm2) | 49.2 (31.5) | 43.5 (27.8) | 55.6 (34.2) | |
| AvAcc (m | 37.3 (10.9) | 41.6 (11.2) | 32.5 (8.2) | |
| IG | –2.19 (0.20) | –2.09 (0.16) | –2.31 (0.18) | |
| MX metrics (m | ||||
| M2 | 951.0 (448.2) | 1180.3 (434.4) | 691.8 (297.0) | |
| M5 | 665.8 (315.7) | 817.6 (322.0) | 494.3 (199.5) | |
| M15 | 398.7 (174.0) | 472.2 (189.2) | 315.6 (105.2) | |
| M30 | 275.0 (98.7) | 312.8 (108.8) | 232.3 (63.1) | |
| M60 | 158.3 (51.3) | 202.7 (55.5) | 165.7 (37.5) | |
| M120 | 116.1 (30.0) | 124.9 (30.8) | 106.0 (25.6) | |
| M1/3Day | 20.3 (6.3) | 21.8 (6.5) | 18.7 (5.7) | |
| Wear time (min/day) | 1413.7 (41.1) | 1414.1 (39.0) | 1413.3 (43.4) | 0.784 |
| Valid days | 6.9 (0.2) | 6.9 (0.2) | 7.0 (0.1) | |
BMI, body mass index; FM%, fat mass percentage; AvAcc, average acceleration; IG, intensity gradient; M2, M5, M15, M30, M60, M120, and M1/3, the acceleration above which the most active 2, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and min, and 8 h are accumulated, respectively
Values are presented as mean (SD) or percentage. The differences between children and adolescents were evaluated using the chi-square test and Student’s t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Boldfaced values: p < 0.05
Fig. 1Radar plots illustrating differences in MX metrics between children and adolescents. MX metrics representing the acceleration (mg) above which the most active 2 min (M2), 5 min (M5), 15 min (M15), 30 min (M30), 60 min (M60), 120 min (M120), and 8 h (M1/3DAY) of the day are accumulated; PA, physical activity; *p < 0.05
Linear regression analysis of associations between 24-h activity metrics and adiposity indicators among children (n = 382)
| BMI | FM% | VAT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |||||||
| AvAcc (m | 0.00 | (−0.01, 0.02) | 0.940 | −0.06 | (−0.16, 0.04) | 0.214 | −0.29 | (−0.62, −0.04) | 0.086 |
| IG | −0.19 | (−1.22, 0.85) | 0.720 | −2.06 | (−9.07, 4.95) | 0.564 | −18.73 | (−43.15, 5.69) | 0.132 |
| M2 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.591 | −0.002 | (0.00, 0.00) | −0.014 | (−0.20, −0.01) | ||
| M5 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.276 | −0.004 | (−0.01, −0.00) | −0.021 | (−0.03, −0.01) | ||
| M15 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.263 | −0.006 | (−0.01, −0.00) | −0.034 | (−0.05, −0.02) | ||
| M30 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.577 | −0.009 | (−0.02, −0.00) | −0.051 | (−0.08, −0.03) | ||
| M60 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.983 | −0.013 | (−0.03, 0.00) | 0.074 | −0.080 | (−0.13, −0.03) | |
| M120 | 0.001 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.753 | −0.023 | (−0.05, 0.00) | 0.086 | −0.122 | (−0.21, −0.03) | |
| M1/3Day | 0.003 | (−0.01, 0.02) | 0.721 | −0.063 | (−0.19, 0.06) | 0.308 | −0.419 | (−0.85, 0.01) | 0.055 |
BMI, body mass index; FM%, fat mass percentage; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; B, unstandardized beta; CI, confidence interval; AvAcc, average acceleration; IG, intensity gradient; MX metrics (M2, M5, M15, M30, M60, M120, and M1/3), the acceleration above which the most active 2, 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min, and 8 h are accumulated, respectively
Analyses were adjusted for sex, maternal education level, maternal overweight and obesity, and wear time. The model with average acceleration was in addition adjusted for intensity gradient and vice versa. Boldfaced values: p < 0.05
Linear regression analysis of associations between 24-h activity metrics and adiposity indicators among adolescents (n = 338)
| BMI | FM% | VAT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |||||||
| AvAcc (m | 0.00 | (−0.01, 0.02) | 0.822 | −0.04 | (−0.16, 0.07) | 0.469 | −0.17 | (−0.68, 0.35) | 0.522 |
| IG | −0.25 | (−0.99, 0.49) | 0.512 | −8.35 | (−13.61, −3.09) | −32.5 | (−55.98, −8.92) | ||
| MX metrics (m | |||||||||
| M2 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.524 | −0.006 | (−0.01, −0.00) | −0.025 | (−0.04, −0.01) | ||
| M5 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.655 | −0.008 | (−0.01, −0.00) | −0.033 | (−0.05, −0.02) | ||
| M15 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.633 | −0.014 | (−0.02, −0.01) | −0.059 | (−0.09, −0.03) | ||
| M30 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.717 | −0.023 | (−0.03, −0.01) | −0.091 | (−0.15, −0.04) | ||
| M60 | 0.000 | (0.00, 0.00) | 0.934 | −0.034 | (−0.05, −0.01) | −0.132 | (−0.22, −0.04) | ||
| M120 | 0.001 | (0.00, 0.01) | 0.753 | −0.041 | (−0.07, −0.01) | −0.156 | (−0.29, −0.02) | ||
| M1/3Day | 0.005 | (−0.01, 0.02) | 0.604 | −0.073 | (−0.21, 0.06) | 0.292 | −0.282 | (−0.89, −0.32) | 0.358 |
BMI, body mass index; FM%, fat mass percentage; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; B, unstandardized beta; CI, confidence interval; AvAcc, average acceleration; IG, intensity gradient; MX metrics (M2, M5, M15, M30, M60, M120, and M1/3Day), the acceleration above which the most active 2, 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min, and 8 h are accumulated, respectively
Analyses were adjusted for sex, maternal education level, maternal overweight and obesity, and wear time. The model with average acceleration was in addition adjusted for intensity gradient and vice versa. Boldfaced values: p < 0.05