| Literature DB >> 31314836 |
Simone Nascimento Dos Santos1,2, Monica Luiza de Alcantara3,4, Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire5, Armando Luis Cantisano6,7, José Aldo Ribeiro Teodoro8, Carmen Lucia Lascasas Porto9, Salomon Israel do Amaral3,4, Orlando Veloso10, Ana Cristina Lopes Albricker11,12, Ana Cláudia Gomes Pereira Petisco13, Fanilda Souto Barros14, Márcio Vinícius Lins Barros15, Mohamed Hassan Saleh13, Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira16,17,18.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31314836 PMCID: PMC6636370 DOI: 10.5935/abc.20190106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol ISSN: 0066-782X Impact factor: 2.000
Figure 1Schematic illustration showing examples of IMT and plaque measurements. IMT measurement (A). Different measurements of 3 carotid plaques: encroaching ≥ 0.5 mm on the arterial lumen (B); measurement > 50% of the surrounding IMT value (C); large plaque (D).
When to measure the intima-media thickness
| 1. Intermediate cardiovascular risk: use the
IMT measurement as an aggravating factor for high risk
reclassification[ |
| 2. Patients known to have a higher cardiovascular risk and hard clinical classification: |
| • Patients with familial
hypercholesterolemia[ |
| • Patients with autoimmune diseases or
who use immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, antiretroviral
drugs, or other medicines that induce elevation of
cholesterol[ |
| • History of early cardiovascular
disease in first-degree relatives[ |
| • Individuals < 60 years with a
severe abnormality in a risk factor[ |
| • Women < 60 years with at least two
risk factors[ |
IMT: intima-media thickness.
Protocol to measure intima-media thickness
| • Two-dimensional fundamental imaging |
| • Do not zoom |
| • Transducer with frequency > 7 MHz |
| • Proper gain adjustment; depth between 3.0 and 4.0 cm |
| • Longitudinal plane of the common carotid and carotid bifurcation |
| • Capture images in the anterior and posterior accesses or the sternocleidomastoid muscle, with the most rectilinear image possible and with a well-defined double-line pattern, and choose the best one |
ELSA Brasil:[13] individuals of both genders, aged 40 to 65 years, of white, multiracial, or black ethnicity
| Mean IMT LCCA (mm) | Mean IMT RCCA (mm) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | P 25 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.60 | White | P 25 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.59 | |||
| P 50 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.71 | P 50 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.69 | |||||
| P 75 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.81 | P 75 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.79 | |||||
| P 90 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.95 | P 90 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.90 | |||||
| Multiracial | P 25 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.61 | Multiracial | P 25 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.60 | |||
| P 50 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.73 | P 50 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.69 | |||||
| P 75 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.85 | P 75 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.82 | |||||
| P 90 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.97 | P 90 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.94 | |||||
| Black | P 25 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.65 | Black | P 25 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.64 | |||
| P 50 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.75 | P 50 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.74 | |||||
| P 75 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.86 | P 75 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.90 | |||||
| P 90 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 1.03 | P 90 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 1.02 | |||||
| White | P 25 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.59 | White | P 25 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.58 | |||
| P 50 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.66 | P 50 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.66 | |||||
| P 75 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.75 | P 75 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.75 | |||||
| P 90 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.86 | P 90 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.84 | |||||
| Multiracial | P 25 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.60 | Multiracial | P 25 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.59 | |||
| P 50 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.67 | P 50 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.68 | |||||
| P 75 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.77 | P 75 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.76 | |||||
| P 90 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.88 | P 90 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.87 | |||||
| Black | P 25 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.61 | Black | P 25 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.63 | |||
| P 50 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.70 | P 50 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.71 | |||||
| P 75 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.79 | P 75 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.80 | |||||
| P 90 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.94 | P 90 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.96 | |||||
RCCA: right common carotid artery; LCCA: left common carotid artery; IMT: intima-media thickness.
MESA table:15 individuals of both genders, aged 65 to 84 years, of white, black, Chinese, or Hispanic ethnicity
| Mean IMT RCCA | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| %25 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| %50 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.83 |
| %75 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1,02 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.96 |
| %25 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| %50 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.78 |
| %75 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.96 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.92 |
| %25 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.68 |
| %50 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.78 |
| %75 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.95 | 1,00 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1,02 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 0.91 |
| %25 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.68 |
| %50 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
| %75 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.87 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.91 |
RCCA: right common carotid artery; LCCA: left common carotid artery; IMT: intima-media thickness.
Figure 2Right carotid and its anatomical subdivisions recommended by the group (adapted from the Mannheim study).9 CC: common carotid; IB: internal branch; BCA: brachiocephalic artery.
Figure 3Recommendation from the Department of Cardiovascular Imaging of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology for the sequence of evaluation of carotid stenosis. PSV: peak systolic velocity.
Figure 4Normal flow patterns of carotid arteries. (A) Common carotid artery. (B) Internal carotid artery. (C) External carotid artery.
Figure 5(1) Diagram illustrating the placement of the cursor and the insonation angle. (A) Parallel to the jet in case of stenosis. (B) Parallel to the vessel. (2) Cursor and insonation angle toward the flow jet in case of stenosis (arrow).
Quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis (Department of Cardiovascular Imaging of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology)
| % Anat Dist St (Nascet) | PSV cm/s | EDV cm/s | PSV lC/ PSV CC | PSV IC / EDV CC | EDV IC / EDV CC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 50% | < 140 | < 40 | < 2.0 | < 8 | < 2.6 |
| 50 to 59% | 140 to 230 | 40 to 69 | 2.0 to 3.1 | 8 to 10 | 2.6 to 5.5 |
| 60 to 69% | – | 70 to 100 | 3.2 to 4.0 | 11 to 13 | – |
| 70 to 79% | > 230 | > 100 | > 4.0 | 14 to 21 | – |
| 80 to 89% | – | > 140 | – | 22 to 29 | > 5.5 |
| > 90% | > 400 | – | > 5.0 | > 30 | |
| Subocclusion | Variable – thin flow | Variable – thin flow | Variable – thin flow | Variable – thin flow | Variable – thin flow |
| Occlusion | Lack of flow | Lack of flow | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
The colors represent, from left to right, the most relevant criteria according to the literature. CC: common carotid; IC: internal carotid; EDV: end-diastolic velocity; PSV: peak systolic velocity.
Figure 6Measurement of lumen reduction. (A) Smooth atheromatous plaque in the lumen. (B) Irregular atheromatous plaque in the lumen.
Circumstances that can change the measurement of flow velocities
| Pathology | Abnormalities in VUS | Assessment alternatives |
|---|---|---|
| Stenosis proximal to the common carotid artery or brachiocephalic artery | Reduced absolute flow velocities (PSV and EDV) | Using the velocity ratio and evaluation by the anatomical criterion |
| Significant stenosis or contralateral carotid occlusion | Compensatory increase in flow velocities | Using the velocity ratio and evaluation by the anatomical criterion |
| Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation) | Variable velocity peaks | Waiting for the most regular period, or using an average of five beats and anatomical criterion |
| Aortic valve stenosis | Reduced absolute flow velocities (PSV and EDV) | Using the velocity ratio and evaluation by the anatomical criterion |
| Aortic valve insufficiency | Increase in PSV flow, with the possibility of retrograde diastolic flow | Using anatomical criterion or velocity ratio that does not involve EDV |
VUS: Vascular Ultrasound; EDV: end-diastolic velocity; PSV: peak systolic velocity.
Figure 7Extracranial segments of the vertebral artery (V0-V3).
Cut-off velocity values for proximal vertebral artery stenosis
| Stenosis | < 50% | 50 to 69% | 70 to 99% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vmax | ≥ 85 cm/s | ≥ 140 cm/s | ≥ 210 cm/s |
| VVR | ≥ 1.3 | ≥ 2.1 | ≥ 4 |
| EDV | ≥ 27 cm/s | ≥ 35 cm/s | ≥ 55 cm/s |
VVR: maximum velocity rate at the stenosis site and the V2 segment; EDV: end-diastolic velocity.
Recommendation from the Department of Cardiovascular Imaging for screening and follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm
| Screening |
|---|
| • Men aged 65 to 75 years |
| • Men aged 55 to 75 years with a family history of AAA and/or who smokes |
| • Women aged 55 to 75 years with a family history of AAA and/or who smokes |
| • 2.6 to 2.9 cm – reevaluate in 5 years (sub-aneurysmal dilation) |
| • 3.0 to 3.9 cm – 24 months |
| • 4.0 to 4.5 cm – 12 months |
| • 4.6 to 5.0 cm – 6 months |
| • > 5.0 cm – 3 months |
| • ≥ 5.5 cm |
| • AAA-related symptoms |
| • Growth rate > 1.0 cm per year |
AAA: abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Figure 8Preoperative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
Figure 9Color flow imaging showing the flow proximal to the lesion in red and the turbulent flow at the lesion site (arrow). The diagrams A and C demonstrate the velocity spectrum with Doppler. (A) Cursor proximal to the lesion to measure V1. (B) Cursor at the lesion site to measure V2. (C) Cursor distal to the lesion with damped waveform.
Classification of the degree of stenosis with pulsed wave Doppler
| Classification | Systolic velocity ratio |
|---|---|
| Stenosis < 50% | V2/V1 < 2.0 |
| Stenosis ≥ 50% | V2/V1 ≥ 2.0 |
| Stenosis ≥ 70% | V2/V1 ≥ 4.0 |
| Occlusion | Lack of flow |
General limitations of vascular ultrasound in the evaluation of abdominal aorta and branches
| Aorta and iliacs | Mesenteric arteries/Celiac trunk | Renal arteries |
|---|---|---|
| ● Hostile abdomen | ● Hostile abdomen | ● Hostile abdomen |
| ● Obesity | ● Obesity | ● Obesity |
| ● Intestinal meteorism | ● Intestinal meteorism | ● Intestinal meteorism |
| ● Examiner-dependent | ● Patient with severe abdominal pain – in acute ischemia | ● Anatomic changes |
| ● Low-quality equipment | ● Examiner-dependent | ● Examiner-dependent |
| ● Low-quality equipment | ● Low-quality equipment |
Figure 10Abdominal aorta and branches. SA: splenic artery; HA: hepatic artery; RCIA: right common iliac artery; LCIA: left common iliac artery; IMA: inferior mesenteric artery; RRA: right renal artery; LRA: left renal artery; SMA: superior mesenteric artery; CT: celiac trunk.
Figure 11Mesenteric vessels and abdominal aorta. (A) Transverse plane with B-scan showing the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) anteriorly and the abdominal aorta (AA) posteriorly. (B) Longitudinal plane of the abdominal aorta and emergence of the celiac trunk and SMA.
Ultrasonographic criteria to assess the native celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery
| Artery | Normal Doppler | Stenosis ≥ 50% | Stenosis ≥ 70% | Occlusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | Low-resistance | PSV > 240 cm/s EDV > 40 cm/s | PSV > 320 cm/s EDV > 100 cm/s | Lack of flow Retrograde CHA flow |
| SMA Fasting | High-resistance | PSV > 295 cm/s EDV > 45 cm/s | PSV > 400 cm/s EDV > 70 cm/s | Lack of flow |
| SMA Postprandial | Low-resistance | PSV > 295 cm/s EDV > 45 cm/s | PSV > 400 cm/s EDV > 70 cm/s | Lack of flow |
CHA: common hepatic artery; SMA: superior mesenteric artery; CT: celiac trunk; EDV: end-diastolic velocity; PSV: peak systolic velocity.
Clinical indications to investigate renal artery stenosis
| ● Onset of hypertension in patients aged ≤ 30 years |
| ● Onset of severe hypertension in patients aged ≥ 55 years |
| ● Patients with accelerated hypertension (sudden or persistent worsening of previously controlled hypertension) |
| ● Patients with resistant hypertension (treatment failure with full doses of three antihypertensive drug classes, including diuretics) |
| ● Patients with malignant hypertension (with target-organ damage: acute renal failure, acute congestive heart failure, new visual or neurological disorder, and/or advanced retinopathy) |
| ● Patients with worsening of renal function after administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker |
| ● Patients with unexplained renal atrophy or discrepancy > 1.5 cm from kidney sizes |
| ● Patients with sudden and unexplained pulmonary edema (flash pulmonary edema) |
| ● Patients with renal failure or unexplained congestive heart failure |
| ● Patients with refractory angina |
| ● Patients with multiple vessel coronary artery disease |
| ● Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm |
Velocity criteria to quantify renal artery stenosis both native and after stenting
| Degree of stenosis | Renal artery PSV | Renal aortic ratio | Renal artery EDV | Intrarenal flow | Renal artery PSV after stenting | Renal aortic ratio after stenting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | < 200 cm/s | < 3.5 | < 150 cm/s | AT < 70 ms | < 390 cm/s | < 5 |
| < 60% | ≥ 200 cm/s | < 3.5 | < 150 cm/s | AT < 70 ms | < 390 cm/s | < 5 |
| ≥ 60% | ≥ 200 cm/s | ≥ 3.5 | < 150 cm/s | AT < or ≥ 70ms | > 390 cm/s | ≥ 5 |
| ≥ 80% | ≥ 200 cm/s | ≥ 3.5 | ≥ 150 cm/s | AT ≥ 70 ms
| ≥ 390 cm/s | ≥ 5 |
| Occlusion | - | - | - | Might have | - | - |
AT: acceleration time; EDV: end-diastolic velocity; PSV: peak systolic velocity.
Classification of the degree of stenosis in native arteries with pulsed wave Doppler
| Classification | Systolic velocity ratio |
|---|---|
| Stenosis < 50% | V2/V1 < 2.0 |
| Stenosis ≥ 50% | V2/V1 ≥ 2.0 |
| Stenosis ≥ 70% | V2/V1 ≥ 4.0 |
| Occlusion | Lack of flow |
Arterial flow patterns in various situations
| ; | Name | Clinical meaning | Occurrence situation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triphasic | Found in young and normal individuals | Normal | |
| Triphasic without the elastic component | Found in old adults with reduced vessel elasticity | ● Normal old adults | |
| Biphasic hyperemic | Without retrograde component, but reaches the baseline. Increased velocities | ● Inflammatory process | |
| Biphasic post-obstructive | Without retrograde component, but reaches the baseline. Low velocities | After moderate obstructions | |
| Biphasic with retrograde pandiastolic component | Retrograde pandiastolic component. Usually with normal velocities | Vessels that provide collateral to other stenotic arteries. In most cases, vessels without proximal lesions | |
| Biphasic "to-and-fro" | Pronounced retrograde pandiastolic component | ● Pseudoaneurysm | |
| Acute monophasic | Low velocity, with little increase in acceleration time | Moderate and moderate to severe post-stenosis, WITH vasodilation reserve | |
| Damped monophasic | Low velocity, with increased acceleration time | Severe post-stenosis or post-occlusion, WITH vasodilation reserve | |
| Extremely damped monophasic | Very low velocity, with high increase in acceleration time | Post-occlusion, WITH vasodilation reserve | |
| Monophasic without diastole | Extremely low velocity, with increased acceleration time, without diastole flow | Post-occlusion, WITHOUT vasodilation reserve. Severe multisegmental lesions | |
| Continuous | Extremely low velocity, with acceleration time so increased that it is not possible to differentiate PSV from EDV | Post-occlusion, WITH vasodilation reserve. Severe multisegmental lesions | |
| Retrograde | Low velocity, can be damped or not, and can even have a retrograde component | Retrograde filling of a vessel with proximal occlusion |
EDV: end-diastolic velocity; PSV: peak systolic velocity.
Figure 12Types of brachiocephalic fistulas (Brescia-Cimino). (A) Latero-lateral between artery and vein. (B) Terminal artery – lateral vein. (C) Terminal vein – lateral artery. (D) Termino-terminal between artery and vein.
Figure 13Types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts. (A) Straight PTFE graft between the basilic vein and radial artery. (B) Loop PTFE graft between the basilic vein and radial artery. (C) Curved PTFE graft between the brachial artery and vein. (D) Loop PTFE graft between the great saphenous vein and femoral artery.
Figure 14Measurement of the distance between the brachial artery and basilic vein before the creation of alternative arteriovenous fistulas.
Objectives of arteriovenous fistulas for proper hemodialysis (95%)[77]
| ● Vascular diameter: > 4 mm |
|---|
| ● Flow volume: > 500 ml/min |
| ● Maturation time: > 30 days |
| ● Diameters < 3mm and flow volume < 400 ml/min = high probability of failure |
| ● Vessel diameter should increase with time |
Figure 15Steal phenomenon with retrograde flow in the radial artery (in blue), in the segment distal to the anastomosis of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis.
Mapping of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis before the procedure
| Arterial diameter – mm | Venous diameter – mm | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal arm/forearm | ||||||||
| Mid arm/forearm | ||||||||
| Distal arm/forearm | ||||||||
| Elbow/wrist | ||||||||
| Skin-vessel depth | ||||||||
| Distance A-V | ||||||||
Mapping of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis after the procedure
| Anastomosis: | Arterial diameter – mm | Venous diameter – mm | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal arm/forearm | ||||||||
| Mid arm/forearm | ||||||||
| Distal arm/forearm | ||||||||
| Elbow/wrist | ||||||||
| Skin-vessel depth | ||||||||
Figure 16Two-dimensional image of a recent partial thrombus (acute) located in the valve sinus of the common femoral vein, shown through longitudinal (A) and transverse (B) planes. There is no complete collapse of the vein during compression (C).
Figure 17Venous compression maneuver. (A) Artery and vein without compression. (B) Normal vein with total compression. (C) Dilated and incompressible vein, with recent thrombus. (D) Incompressible vein, with old thrombus (chronic). (E) Rethrombosis.
Characteristics of different stages of deep venous thrombosis observed in vascular ultrasound
| Stage | Acute | Intermediate (subacute) | Chronic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Event time | Up to 14 days | 14 to 28 days | > 28 days |
| Vessel caliber | Dilated | Still dilated, normal, or slightly reduced | Usually reduced |
| Incompressibility | Total or partial | Total or partial | Partial or absent |
| Thrombus aspect | Hypoechoic | Isoechoic | Hyperechoic |
| Flow | Absent or partial | Flow channels permeating the thrombotic mass Can have microfistula | Multiple flow channels permeating the
thrombus |
Venous flow variation according to the phase of the respiratory cycle
| Flow | Inspiration | Expiration |
|---|---|---|
| Lower limbs | ↓ | ↑ |
| Upper limbs | ↑ | ↓ |
| Subclavians | ↑ | ↓ |
Identification of intracranial trunk arteries with "blind" transcranial Doppler[114]
| Artery | Depth | Flow Vm | Flow direction in relation to the transducer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carotid siphon | 55 to 70 mm | 40 to 50 cm/s | Positive or negative |
| Ophthalmic | 40 to 60 mm | 20 cm/s | Positive |
| Distal internal carotid | 55 to 70 mm | 45 cm/s | Positive |
| Anterior cerebral | 60 to 70 mm | 60 cm/s | Negative |
| Middle cerebral | 35 to 60 mm | 70 cm/s | Positive |
| Posterior cerebral | 55 to 70 mm | 40 cm/s | Positive (P1), negative (P2) |
| Vertebral | 55 to 70 mm | 40 cm/s | Negative |
| Basilar | 70 to 120 mm | 45 cm/s | Negative |
Clinical indications for transcranial Doppler115,116
| Pathology | Objective | Observation | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brain death* | Additional examination judicially valid to confirm cerebral circulatory arrest | Standard study of anterior and posterior circulation arteries is mandatory. In case of residual blood flow, repeat after 12 hours | Spectral curve with short peak systolic (< 50 cm/s) pattern and lack of diastolic flow; or "alternating" pattern (antegrade systolic and retrograde diastolic flow) |
| Intracranial hypertension111 | Adjuvant indirect monitoring, including after decompressive craniectomy | Qualitative analysis of the curve pattern, which can vary dynamically (inversion of the diastolic component delimits the irreversible stage) | Progressive reduction of the diastolic component of the spectral flow curve according to the severity of hypertension |
| Ischemic CVA (acute phase)[ | Monitoring of vessel reperfusion in case of thrombolysis (up to 4.5 hours after the start of the event), which lasts approximately 40 minutes (but can take more than 1 hour) | Monitoring can be intermittent (conventional equipment) or continuous (transducer with "blind" Doppler fixed to a helmet adjustable to the patient's head) | Reappearance of gradual flow according to the degree of reperfusion (TIBI scale of spectral curve pattern) |
| Subarachnoid hemorrhage** [ | Diagnosis, assessment of severity, and monitoring of vasospasm, recommending early intervention | Perform the examination at hospital admission and repeat it daily in case of vasospasm (critical period: 4 to 14 days after the event). Insonate all arteries at each examination | Increase in mean flow velocity, according to the severity. Lindegaard ratio (velocity ratio between the middle cerebral artery and ipsilateral internal carotid) differentiates true spasm from hyperemia |
| Patent foramen ovale*** [ | Shunt study in patients with ischemic CVA (transient or permanent) | Intravenous infusion of shaken saline solution ("macrobubbles") associated with the Valsalva maneuver | HITS (gaseous emboli) recorded in spectral curves are counted and classified according to the Spencer scale |
| Sickle cell disease**** [ | Diagnosis and grading of intraluminal stenosis to stratify the risk of ischemic CVA and define the therapeutic approach. Monitoring of therapeutic response | Mandatory in patients aged 2 to 16 years | Mean flow velocity defines the periodicity of follow-up and approach (blood exchange) |
| Migraine[ | Support for clinical diagnosis and differentiation from other headaches | It can be performed in the intercritical period or during a painful crisis (different results) | Measurement of pulsatility index and mean flow velocity in all vessels |
| Transoperative monitoring[ | Preoperative assessment of CVA risk (monitoring of spontaneous microemboli; study of cerebral flow reserve) and peroperative monitoring of emboli and cerebral flow reduction during neurological and cardiovascular surgeries | Continuous flow monitoring of middle cerebral arteries using two transducers with "blind" Doppler fixed to a helmet adjustable to the patient's head. Monitoring should continue in the postoperative (due to microemboli during this period) | Report of emboli rate (solid and/or gaseous) and reduction in mean flow velocity compared to the baseline value (> 15%) determine the risk of ischemic CVA in the immediate postoperative period***** |
CVA: cerebrovascular accident; HITS: high-intensity transient signals; TIBI: thrombolysis in brain ischemia (scale). Information followed by asterisks (*) have additional data, presented in the text below.
Indications for contrast agents in vascular ultrasound
| System | Application | Level of evidence | Probe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carotids | Occlusion or subocclusion | B | Linear |
| Aorta | Dissection, extension of the flap to branches, false lumen patency, re-entry points, and perfusion level of branches that originate from false lumen | C | Convex abdominal or sector cardiac |
| Differentiation between an inflammatory aneurysm
and contained rupture | B | ||
| Intracerebral vessels | Signal increase in unsatisfactory basal
study | A | Sector cardiac |
| Complications in vascular accesses | Arteriovenous fistulas | C | Linear or convex abdominal or sector cardiac |
| Kidney | Signal increase in the renal artery | C | Convex abdominal or sector cardiac |
| Lower limbs | Obstructive atherosclerotic disease (assessment
of collateral circulation and microcirculation) | C | Linear or convex abdominal |
CVA: cerebrovascular accident.
| Declaration of potential conflict of interest of authors/collaborators of the Vascular Ultrasound Statement from the Department of Cardiovascular Imaging of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology – 2019 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| If the last three years the author/developer of the Statement: | |||||||
| Names Members of the Statement | Participated in clinical studies and/or experimental trials supported by pharmaceutical or equipment related to the guideline in question | Has spoken at events or activities sponsored by industry related to the guideline in question | It was (is) advisory board member or director of a pharmaceutical or equipment | Committees participated in completion of research sponsored by industry | Personal or institutional aid received from industry | Produced scientific papers in journals sponsored by industry | It shares the industry |
| Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| José Aldo Ribeiro Teodoro | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Carmen Lucia Lascasas Porto | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Orlando Veloso | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Ana Cláudia Gomes Pereira Petisco | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Fanilda Souto Barros | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Márcio Vinícius Lins Barros | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Mohamed Hassan Saleh | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Simone Nascimento dos Santos | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Monica Luiza de Alcantara | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Salomon Israel do Amaral | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Ana Cristina Lopes Albricker | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Armando Luis Cantisano | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Examination instructions and protocols for the study of abdominal aorta and branches
| Examination instructions | Abdominal aorta | Aortoiliac segment | Mesenteric arteries and celiac trunk | Renal arteries |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-frequency convex or sector transducers (2 to 5 MHz) | x | x | x | x |
| Preferentially in the morning with 6- to 8-h fasting | x | x | x | x |
| The patient should not smoke, chew gums, or consume carbonated beverages | x | x | x | x |
| Optional antiflatulent | x | x | x | x |
| Supine position with head raised at 30o | x | x | x | x |
| Lateral position | x | x | – | x |
| Transverse, coronal, and longitudinal planes | x | x | x | x |
| What to evaluate: | ||||
| B-scan: | ||||
| Dimensions | x | x | x | x |
| Anatomic changes | x | x | x | x |
| Morphology of walls and plaques | x | x | x | x |
| Presence of thrombi | x | x | – | – |
| Color Doppler: | ||||
| Aliasing | x | x | x | x |
| Lack of flow (occlusion) | x | x | x | x |
| Spectral Doppler: | ||||
| PSV | – | x | x | x |
| PSV ratio (V2/V1) | – | x | – | – |
| EDV | – | – | x | x |
| Renal aortic ratio | – | – | – | x |
EDV: end-diastolic velocity; PSV: peak systolic velocity.
Protocol for diagnostic examination and preoperative mapping
| Artery | B-scan | Pulsed Wave Doppler | Color Imaging | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFA | Transverse: evaluate the diameter and
aspect of the wall | Transverse: measure the dilations
and, if possible, the intraluminal stenosis | Longitudinal: use an angle ≤ 60 degrees, laminar flow, and multiphase curve (triphase) | Longitudinal: evaluate the flow in
the stenosis, and proximal and distal to the stenosis | Assess vessel patency with
intraluminal color filling |
| Proximal SFA | |||||
| Mid SFA | |||||
| Distal SFA | |||||
| PA | |||||
| PTA | |||||
| ATA | |||||
| FA | |||||
| TFT | |||||
FA: fibular artery; CFA: common femoral artery; DFA: deep femoral artery; SFA: superficial femoral artery; PA: popliteal artery; ATA: anterior tibial artery; PTA: posterior tibial artery; TFT: tibial-fibular trunk.
Vasospasm classification
| Artery: MCA | MFV (cm/s) | Lindegaard ratio |
|---|---|---|
| 120 to 130 | 3 to 6 | |
| Moderate | 130 to 200 | 3 to 6 |
| Severe | > 200 | > 6 |
| Artery: ACA | > 50% of MFV in 24h | – |
| Artery: PCA | > 110 | – |
| Artery: VA | > 80 | – |
| Artery: basilar | Soustiel ratio | |
| Mild | 80 to 95 | 2 to 2.49 |
| Moderate | > 85 | 2.5 to 2.99 |
| Severe | > 115 | > 3 |
MCA: middle cerebral artery; ACA: anterior cerebral artery; PCA: posterior cerebral artery; VA: vertebral artery. Note: Lindegaard ratio is the ratio between the highest mean flow velocity (MFV) in the middle cerebral artery (M1) and MFV in the ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid. Soustiel ratio is the ratio between vertebral MFV and basilar MFV.
Recommendations of the Brazilian Guidelines for Transcranial Doppler in Children and adolescents with Sickle Cell Disease (2010)[123]
| Mean flow velocity | CVA risk group | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Inadequate ultrasonic windows | Inconclusive | Use another imaging method to assess cerebrovascular events |
| Difficult execution: uncooperative patient | Inconclusive | Repeat in 3 months, with a different examiner if possible |
| < 70 cm/s | Low flow | Repeat the examination in 30 days |
| < 170 cm/s | Normal | Repeat the examination in 12 months |
| 170 to 184 cm/s | "Low conditional" | Repeat the examination in 3 months: if < 170 cm/s, repeat in 12 months |
| 184 to 199 cm/s | "High conditional" | Repeat the examination in 30 days: if < 170 cm/s, repeat TCD every 3 months; if two consecutive examinations are abnormal, consider long-term blood exchange |
| 200 to 220 cm/s | Abnormal | Repeat the examination in 30 days: if > 200 cm/s, blood exchange; if "high conditional", repeat TCD in 3 months; if "low conditional", repeat it in 6 months |
| > 220 cm/s | Abnormal | Imminent risk of CVA, consider long-term blood exchange |
CVA: cerebrovascular accident; TCD: transcranial Doppler.
CAPS table:[14] individuals of both genders, aged 25 to 45 years. There is no ethnic classification
| %25 | 0.515 | 0.585 | 0.634 | 0.68 | 0.745 | 0.814 | 0.83 | %25 | 0.524 | 0.575 | 0.619 | 0.665 | 0.718 | 0.771 | 0.807 | |||
| %50 | 0.567 | 0.633 | 0.686 | 0.746 | 0.83 | 0.914 | 0.937 | %50 | 0.567 | 0.615 | 0.665 | 0.719 | 0.778 | 0.837 | 0.880 | |||
| %75 | 0.633 | 0.682 | 0.756 | 0.837 | 0.921 | 1.028 | 1.208 | %75 | 0.612 | 0.66 | 0.713 | 0.776 | 0.852 | 0.921 | 0.935 | |||