Literature DB >> 31312795

Cost effectiveness of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in a Middle-Income Country, Turkey: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Vahit Özmen1, Burcu Çakar2, Erhan Gökmen2, Mustafa Özdoğan3, Nilufer Güler4, Cihan Uras5, Engin Ok6, Orhan Demircan5, Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan7, Pınar Saip8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease, and genetic profiling helps to individualize adjuvant treatment. The Oncotype DX is a validated test to predict benefit of adjuvant systemic treatment. The aims of this study are to determine the costs of chemotherapy in government hospitals in Turkey and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Oncotype DX from the national insurance perspective.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed to make long term projections of distant recurrence, survival, quality adjusted life expectancy, and direct costs for patients with ER+, HER2-, node-negative or up to 3 node-positive early stage breast cancer. Turkish decision impact study patient data were captured for model reference. In that study, ten academic centers across Turkey participated in a prospective trial. Of 165 patients with pT1-3, pN0-N1mic, ER-positive, and HER-2 negative tumors, 57% had low recurrence score (RS), 35% had intermediate RS, and 8% had high RS, respectively. The overall rate of change in chemotherapy treatment decisions following Oncotype DX was 33%.
RESULTS: The cost of adjuvant chemotherapy in public hospitals was estimated at $3.649, and Oncotype Dx test was $5.141. Based on the cost-effectiveness analysis, Oncotype DX testing was estimated to improve life expectancy (+0.86 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (+0.68 QALYs) versus standard care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICERs) of Oncotype DX was estimated to be $7207.9 per QALY gained and $5720.6 per LY gained versus current clinical practice.
CONCLUSION: As Oncotype DX was found both cost-effective and life-saving from a national perspective, the test should be introduced to standard care in patients with ER+, HER-2 negative early-stage breast cancer in Turkey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early breast cancer; cost; genetic profiling; markov model; oncotype-Dx

Year:  2019        PMID: 31312795      PMCID: PMC6619785          DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  20 in total

Review 1.  Health-state utility values in breast cancer.

Authors:  Tessa Peasgood; Sue E Ward; John Brazier
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  A longitudinal prospective study of health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous blood stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  B L Conner-Spady; C Cumming; J-M Nabholtz; P Jacobs; D Stewart
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Wanseop Kim; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Drew Watson; John Bryant; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Quality-of-life valuations of advanced breast cancer by New Zealand women.

Authors:  Richard J Milne; Kathy H Heaton-Brown; Paul Hansen; David Thomas; Vernon Harvey; Alison Cubitt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Laura Van't Veer; Emiel Rutgers; Sherene Loi; Stella Mook; Martine J Piccart-Gebhart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Kathy S Albain; William E Barlow; Steven Shak; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Robert B Livingston; I-Tien Yeh; Peter Ravdin; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Nancy E Davidson; George W Sledge; Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; Kathleen I Pritchard; Lois Shepherd; Julie R Gralow; Carl Yoshizawa; D Craig Allred; C Kent Osborne; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Christopher Wale; John Forbes; Elizabeth A Mallon; Janine Salter; Emma Quinn; Anita Dunbier; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Steven Shak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The total hospital and community UK costs of managing patients with relapsed breast cancer.

Authors:  R J Thomas; M Williams; C Marshall; J Glen; M Callam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Prevention, Screening, and Treatment Interventions.

Authors:  Jinani Jayasekera; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A hierarchical approach to combine histological grade and immunohistochemical factors to identify high-risk luminal breast cancers.

Authors:  Felipe Andrés Cordero da Luz; Eduarda da Costa Marinho; Camila Piqui Nascimento; Lara de Andrade Marques; Patrícia Ferreira Ribeiro Delfino; Rafael Mathias Antonioli; Rogério Agenor de Araújo; Marcelo José Barbosa Silva
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  What is the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI in the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Patients with Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Filiz Çelebi
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.