Literature DB >> 31312681

Reconstruction of Acute Acromioclavicular (AC) Joint Dislocations with or without Tendon Graft: a Retrospective Comparative Study.

Brian K Lee1,2,3, Grant C Jamgochian1,2,3, Usman Ali M Syed1,2,3, Charles L Getz1,2,3, Christopher C Dodson1,2,3, Surena Namdari1,2,3, Matthew L Ramsey1,2,3, Gerald R Williams1,2,3, Joseph A Abboud1,2,3, Mark D Lazarus1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstructions of acute acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations have been thought to result in superior outcomes than chronic dislocations. The use of tendon graft in reconstructions has demonstrated favorable biomechanical properties. To determine whether utilizing tendon graft during repair of acute AC dislocations results in superior outcomes and lower complication rate.
METHODS: A retrospective review of AC reconstructions was conducted. Reconstructions performed within 3 weeks of injury were included. Inclusion criteria included age over 18, grade 3-5 AC joint separation, and no previous ipsilateral shoulder injury. Primary outcome measure was radiographic loss of reduction. Secondary outcomes included ASES and SANE scores.
RESULTS: Of 47 reconstructions of acute AC joint separations, 35 utilized fixation without a tendon graft, while 12 underwent an anatomic reconstruction with tendon graft. Repairs without the use of graft resulted in 8 (23%) cases of loss of reduction, while tendon graft augmented repairs resulted in 5 (42%). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.22). No patients required reoperation. There was no statistical difference in the ASES and SANE scores between the two groups. Furthermore, we found no significant difference in ASES or SANE scores in patients who maintained reduction postoperatively versus those that lost reduction.
CONCLUSION: A greater but not statistically significant rate of loss of reduction was observed in the group reconstructed with the use of a tendon graft. Further research is needed to determine whether the use of tendon graft is beneficial in the treatment of acute AC joint separations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AC reconstruction; Acromioclavicular; CC reconstruction; Coracoclavicular

Year:  2019        PMID: 31312681      PMCID: PMC6578477     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  31 in total

1.  Salvage of failed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus tendon from the knee. Surgical technique and case report.

Authors:  H P Jones; M J Lemos; A A Schepsis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The acromioclavicular capsule as a restraint to posterior translation of the clavicle: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  J J Klimkiewicz; G R Williams; J S Sher; A Karduna; J Des Jardins; J P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  MIGRATION OF A THREADED STEINMANN PIN FROM AN ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT INTO THE SPINAL CANAL. A CASE REPORT.

Authors:  H NORRELL; R C LLEWELLYN
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Stephen A Santangelo; Sean T Johnson; Clifford G Rios; Mark L Dumonski; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments with tendon grafts: a comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Steven J Lee; Stephen J Nicholas; Kenneth H Akizuki; Malachy P McHugh; Ian J Kremenic; Simon Ben-Avi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The anatomic reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations using 2 TightRope devices: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Lars Walz; Gian M Salzmann; Thomas Fabbro; Stefan Eichhorn; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The coracoidal insertion of the coracoclavicular ligaments: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Gian M Salzmann; Jochen Paul; Gunther H Sandmann; Andreas B Imhoff; Philip B Schöttle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Anatomy of the clavicle and coracoid process for reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Authors:  Clifford G Rios; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Ryan S Costic; Joanne E Labriola; Mark W Rodosky; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Biomechanical function of surgical procedures for acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Rajesh Jari; Ryan S Costic; Mark W Rodosky; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan D Walters; Anthony Ignozzi; Francis Bustos; Brian C Werner; Stephen F Brockmeier
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-24

3.  Anchorless Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Repair Using a Graft-Passing Instrument to Pass Suture Under the Coracoid.

Authors:  Shane Rayos Del Sol; Therese Dela Rueda; Steven Perinovic; Moyukh O Chakrabarti; Stewart Bryant; Brandon Gardner; Patrick J McGahan; James L Chen
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-12-20

4.  Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Fixation are Similar With or Without Allograft Augmentation.

Authors:  Ryan W Paul; Zachary S Aman; Bryson R Kemler; Alim Osman; James P Doran; Joseph Brutico; Fotios P Tjoumakaris; Kevin B Freedman
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.