Literature DB >> 15007312

Biomechanical function of surgical procedures for acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Rajesh Jari1, Ryan S Costic, Mark W Rodosky, Richard E Debski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgical procedures for treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation replace the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments to minimize motion, allow scarring, and increase the subsequent stability of the joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical function of the surgically repaired or reconstructed (CC Sling, Rockwood Screw [DePuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, IN], and Coracoacromial [CA] Ligament Transfer Construct) AC joint after AC joint dislocation. TYPE OF STUDY: A cadaver study using a convenience sample.
METHODS: Twelve cadaveric shoulders were tested using a robotic/UFS testing system. Three external loading conditions (anterior, posterior, or superior load of 70 N) were applied to intact and surgically repaired or reconstructed AC joint. The resulting kinematics of the AC joint and in situ forces in the CC ligaments or surgical constructs was determined.
RESULTS: For the CC Sling, anterior and posterior translation significantly increased by 110% and 330% in response to an anterior and posterior load, respectively. However, the posterior translation for the Rockwood Screw significantly decreased by 60%. Anterior, posterior, and superior translation for the CA Ligament Transfer Construct significantly increased by 110%, 360%, and 100%, respectively. The coupled translations also significantly increased for the CC Sling and CA Ligament Transfer Construct in response to all loading conditions. In contrast, the coupled translations for the Rockwood Screw tended to decrease. Furthermore, the in situ forces increased significantly for all 3 surgical constructs compared with the intact CC Ligaments in response to an anterior and posterior load.
CONCLUSIONS: At time zero, increases in the primary and coupled motion for the CC Sling and CA Ligament Transfer Construct could comprise the initial healing period prescribed for AC joint dislocation. Our findings also suggest that the Rockwood Screw provides a highly rigid fixation and may explain the complications frequently seen in clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Current surgical procedures do not have the appropriate stiffness to restore the stability of the intact joint before healing. Therefore, our results may lead to the design and development of new repairs, reconstructions, and rehabilitation protocols for AC joint dislocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15007312     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  36 in total

1.  Arthroscopically assisted anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using tendon graft.

Authors:  Yon-Sik Yoo; Young-Jin Seo; Kyu-Cheol Noh; Bishu Prasad Patro; Do-Young Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular PDS augmentation for complete AC joint dislocation showed insufficient properties in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Frank Martetschläger; Arne Buchholz; Gunther Sandmann; Sebastian Siebenlist; Stefan Döbele; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Ulrich Stöckle; Peter J Millett; Florian Elser; Andreas Lenich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Horizontal and Vertical Stabilization of Acute Unstable Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries Arthroscopy-Assisted.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz; Marina Besalduch; Alexandru Petrica; Ana Escolà; Joaquim Rodriguez; Jan Carlo Fallone
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-23

4.  A modified technique of arthroscopically assisted AC joint reconstruction and preliminary results.

Authors:  Daniel P Tomlinson; David W Altchek; Jeffrey Davila; Frank A Cordasco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Luggage tag technique of anatomic fixation of displaced acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Keith Baldwin; Surena Namdari; Jaron R Andersen; Brian Lee; John M Itamura; G Russell Huffman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Jan P Kempka; Steffen Schanz; Thore Zantop; Hazibullah Waizy; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Suspension suture augmentation for repair of coracoclavicular ligament disruptions.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Huang; Pang-Hsin Hsieh; Kuo-Chung Huang; Kuo-Chin Huang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Pierorazio Motta; Laura Bruno; Alberto Maderni; Piermario Tosco; Umberto Mariotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Superior clavicle drilling points and fluoroscopic inclination for anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Takenaga; Masahito Yoshida; Richard E Debski; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl; Albert Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  A comparison between two double-button endoscopically assisted surgical techniques for the treatment acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  P Vulliet; M Le Hanneur; V Cladiere; P Loriaut; P Boyer
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.