Literature DB >> 15572323

Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Ryan S Costic1, Joanne E Labriola, Mark W Rodosky, Richard E Debski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatments of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations replace or reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligaments with a single structure and do not account for the anatomical variance of each ligament in the design.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the cyclic behavior and structural properties of an anatomic tendon reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligament complex after a simulated acromioclavicular joint dislocation. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure protocol (simulated dislocation) of the normal coracoclavicular ligament complex was performed and repeated after an anatomic reconstruction on the same specimen (n = 9). The anatomical reconstruction consisted of a semitendinosus tendon that replicated the direction and orientation of both the trapezoid and conoid ligaments.
RESULTS: The coracoclavicular ligament and anatomical reconstruction complexes had clinically insignificant (<3 mm) permanent elongation after cyclic loading. The stiffness and ultimate load of the coracoclavicular ligament complex (60.8 +/- 12.2 N/mm and 560 +/- 206 N) were significantly greater than for the anatomical reconstruction complex (23.4 +/- 5.2 N/mm and 406 +/- 60 N), respectively (P < .05). Further analysis of the complexes revealed a 40% decrease in the bending stiffness of the clavicle after the simulated dislocation and failure of the normal coracoclavicular ligament complex (P < .05), which contributed to the diminished properties of the anatomic reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: The low level of permanent elongation after cyclic loading suggests that the anatomic reconstruction complex could withstand early rehabilitation; however, the decrease in the structural properties and stiffness of the clavicle should be considered in optimizing the anatomic reconstruction technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite the differences compared to the normal coracoclavicular ligament complex, the anatomical reconstruction complex more closely approximates the stiffness of the coracoclavicular ligament complex than current surgical constructs, and the incorporation of biological tissue could improve the overall structural properties with healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15572323     DOI: 10.1177/0363546504264637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  66 in total

1.  [Arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Greiner; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular PDS augmentation for complete AC joint dislocation showed insufficient properties in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Frank Martetschläger; Arne Buchholz; Gunther Sandmann; Sebastian Siebenlist; Stefan Döbele; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Ulrich Stöckle; Peter J Millett; Florian Elser; Andreas Lenich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Jan P Kempka; Steffen Schanz; Thore Zantop; Hazibullah Waizy; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Suspension suture augmentation for repair of coracoclavicular ligament disruptions.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Huang; Pang-Hsin Hsieh; Kuo-Chung Huang; Kuo-Chin Huang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Biomechanics of a new technique for minimal-invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Simon Lenschow; Peter Schürmann; Mike Schroeglmann; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Kösters; Michael J Raschke
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Pierorazio Motta; Laura Bruno; Alberto Maderni; Piermario Tosco; Umberto Mariotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  All arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with fiberwire and endobutton system.

Authors:  Marco Spoliti; Mauro De Cupis; Alessio Giai Via; Francesco Oliva
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-02-05

8.  Open capsular and ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus hamstring autograft successfully controls superior and posterior translation for type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Raffaele Garofalo; Enrico Ceccarelli; Alessandro Castagna; Vittorio Calvisi; Brody Flanagin; Marco Conti; Sumant G Krishnan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Tim Saier; Arne J Venjakob; Philipp Minzlaff; Peter Föhr; Filip Lindell; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt; Sepp Braun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Surgical treatment of fresh complete acromioclavicular dislocation by coracoid process transfer and k-wire transfixation.

Authors:  Yeming Wang; Jianguo Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.