Literature DB >> 18755935

The coracoidal insertion of the coracoclavicular ligaments: an anatomic study.

Gian M Salzmann1, Jochen Paul, Gunther H Sandmann, Andreas B Imhoff, Philip B Schöttle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current surgical procedures restoring a dislocated acromioclavicular joint aim to perform an anatomically correct and biomechanically stable reconstruction. However, the coracoidal insertions for the coracoclavicular ligaments have not yet been defined.
PURPOSE: The objective was to evaluate dimension and orientation of the coracoclavicular footprints with respect to bony landmarks for use in anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligament complex. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: Twenty-three (17 female, 6 male) fresh-frozen cadaveric human shoulders were dissected, and the coracoclavicular ligaments including the coracoid and the lateral clavicle were exposed. After measurement of bony coracoidal dimensions, the ligaments were dissected and the insertion sites as well as the footprint centers were identified and marked. Each coracoclavicular insertion dimension and its distance to the bony landmarks was recorded. Sex-related differences were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean total coracoidal length was 43.1 +/- 2.2 mm. The distance from the tip of the coracoid to the precipice, the point at which the undersurface of the coracoid changes from a horizontal to a vertical direction, measured 20.3 +/- 2.6 mm. The mean distance from the conoidal center to the medial coracoidal boarder and to the precipice was 1.7 +/- 0.7 mm and 16.4 +/- 2.4 mm, respectively. The mean distance from the trapezoidal center to the medial border and to the precipice was 8.7 +/- 3 mm and 10.9 +/- 2.4 mm, respectively. The mean distance between the footprint centers was 10.1 +/- 4.2 mm.
CONCLUSION: Reproducible dimensions and orientation of the coracoclavicular footprints are given. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Coracoidal anatomic landmarks can be used intraoperatively for an anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18755935     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508322887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  37 in total

1.  Biomechanical properties of repairs for dislocated AC joints using suture button systems with integrated tendon augmentation.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Elifho Obopilwe; David M Chowaniec; Michael D Nowak; Bryan T Hanypsiak; James J Guerra; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The coracoclavicular ligaments: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Katsumi Takase
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Jakob V Nüchtern; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Großterlinden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Jan P Kempka; Steffen Schanz; Thore Zantop; Hazibullah Waizy; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Biomechanics of a new technique for minimal-invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Simon Lenschow; Peter Schürmann; Mike Schroeglmann; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Kösters; Michael J Raschke
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Epidemiology, anatomy, biomechanics and imaging of acromioclavicular joint injuries].

Authors:  M Wellmann; T Smith
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Superior clavicle drilling points and fluoroscopic inclination for anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Takenaga; Masahito Yoshida; Richard E Debski; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl; Albert Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Acromion morphology and bone mineral density distribution suggest favorable fixation points for anatomic acromioclavicular reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Voss; Felix Dyrna; Andrea Achtnich; Alex Hoberman; Elifho Obopilwe; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Reliability of a CT reconstruction for preoperative surgical planning in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Alexandre Hardy; Philippe Loriaut; Benjamin Granger; Ahmed Neffati; Audrey Massein; Laurent Casabianca; Hugues Pascal-Moussellard; Antoine Gerometta
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Tim Saier; Arne J Venjakob; Philipp Minzlaff; Peter Föhr; Filip Lindell; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt; Sepp Braun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.