Literature DB >> 31307020

Magnetic resonance electrical property mapping at 21.1 T: a study of conductivity and permittivity in phantoms, ex vivo tissue and in vivo ischemia.

Ghoncheh Amouzandeh1, Frederic Mentink-Vigier, Shannon Helsper, F Andrew Bagdasarian, Jens T Rosenberg, Samuel C Grant.   

Abstract

Electrical properties (EP), namely conductivity and permittivity, can provide endogenous contrast for tissue characterization. Using electrical property tomography (EPT), maps of EP can be generated from conventional MRI data. This report investigates the feasibility and accuracy of EPT at 21.1 T for multiple RF coils and modes of operation using phantoms. Additionally, it demonstrates the EP of the in vivo rat brain with and without ischemia. Helmholtz-based EPT was implemented in its Full-form, which demands the complex [Formula: see text] field, and a simplified form requiring either just the [Formula: see text] field phase for conductivity or the [Formula: see text] field magnitude for permittivity. Experiments were conducted at 21.1 T using birdcage and saddle coils operated in linear or quadrature transceive mode, respectively. EPT approaches were evaluated using a phantom, ex and in vivo Sprague-Dawley rats under naïve conditions and ischemic stroke via transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Different conductivity reconstruction approaches applied to the phantom displayed average errors of 12%-73% to the target acquired from dielectric probe measurements. Permittivity reconstructions showed higher agreement and an average 3%-8% error to the target depending on reconstruction approach. Conductivity and permittivity of ex and in vivo rodent brain were measured. Elevated EP in the ischemia region correlated with the increased sodium content and the influx of water intracellularly following ischemia in the lesion were detected. The Full-form technique generated from the linear birdcage provided the best accuracy for EP of the phantom. Phase-based conductivity and magnitude-based permittivity mapping provided reasonable estimates but also demonstrated the limitations of Helmholtz-based EPT at 21.1 T. Permittivity reconstruction was improved significantly over lower fields, suggesting a novel metric for in vivo brain studies. EPT applied to ischemic rat brain proved sensitivity to physiological changes, motivating the future application of more advanced reconstruction approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31307020      PMCID: PMC7223161          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab3259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  71 in total

1.  Analysis of wave behavior in lossy dielectric samples at high field.

Authors:  Qing X Yang; Jinghua Wang; Xiaoliang Zhang; Christopher M Collins; Michael B Smith; Haiying Liu; Xiao-Hong Zhu; J Thomas Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Wei Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Temperature and SAR calculations for a human head within volume and surface coils at 64 and 300 MHz.

Authors:  Christopher M Collins; Wanzhan Liu; Jinghua Wang; Rolf Gruetter; J Thomas Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Michael B Smith
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.

Authors:  Jin Keun Seo; Min-Oh Kim; Joonsung Lee; Narae Choi; Eung Je Woo; Hyung Joong Kim; Oh In Kwon; Dong-Hyun Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  An Inverse Problems Approach to MR-EPT Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  A Borsic; I Perreard; A Mahara; R J Halter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Central brightening due to constructive interference with, without, and despite dielectric resonance.

Authors:  Christopher M Collins; Wanzhan Liu; Weston Schreiber; Qing X Yang; Michael B Smith
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Quantitative analysis of the reconstruction errors of the currently popular algorithm of magnetic resonance electrical property tomography at the interfaces of adjacent tissues.

Authors:  Song Duan; Chao Xu; Guanhua Deng; Jiajia Wang; Feng Liu; Sherman Xuegang Xin
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Conductivity and permittivity imaging at 3.0T.

Authors:  S B Bulumulla; S K Lee; D T B Yeo
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 1.176

8.  From complex B(1) mapping to local SAR estimation for human brain MR imaging using multi-channel transceiver coil at 7T.

Authors:  Xiaotong Zhang; Sebastian Schmitter; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Jiaen Liu; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Reconstruction of dual-frequency conductivity by optimization of phase map in MREIT and MREPT.

Authors:  Oh In Kwon; Woo Chul Jeong; Saurav Z K Sajib; Hyung Joong Kim; Eung Je Woo; Tong In Oh
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  Recent progress and future challenges in MR electric properties tomography.

Authors:  Ulrich Katscher; Dong-Hyun Kim; Jin Keun Seo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.