Literature DB >> 31298193

Marketing the Research Missions of Academic Medical Centers: Why Messages Blurring Lines Between Clinical Care and Research Are Bad for both Business and Ethics.

Mark Yarborough, Timothy Houk, Sarah Tinker Perrault, Yael Schenker, Richard R Sharp.   

Abstract

Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) offer patient care and perform research. Increasingly, AMCs advertise to the public in order to garner income that can support these dual missions. In what follows, we raise concerns about the ways that advertising blurs important distinctions between them. Such blurring is detrimental to AMC efforts to fulfill critically important ethical responsibilities pertaining both to science communication and clinical research, because marketing campaigns can employ hype that weakens research integrity and contributes to therapeutic misconception and misestimation, undermining the informed consent process that is essential to the ethical conduct of research. We offer ethical analysis of common advertising practices that justify these concerns. We also suggest the need for a deliberative body convened by the Association of American Medical Colleges and others to develop a set of voluntary guidelines that AMCs can use to avoid in the future, the problems found in many current AMC advertising practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic Medical Centers; advertising practices; clinical research; informed consent; marketing; science communication; therapeutic misconception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31298193      PMCID: PMC7133024          DOI: 10.1017/S0963180119000392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics        ISSN: 0963-1801            Impact factor:   1.284


  19 in total

1.  Hospital marketing practices: When is it appropriate to advertise new technology?

Authors:  R Finn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The case for letting information speak for itself.

Authors:  L M Schwartz; S Woloshin
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

3.  Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism.

Authors:  Sam Horng; Christine Grady
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

4.  The therapeutic misconception at 25: treatment, research, and confusion.

Authors:  Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  The ethics of hospital marketing. Marketing efforts are necessary but should be ethical and appropriate.

Authors:  William A Nelson; Justin Campfield
Journal:  Healthc Exec       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

6.  Healthcare.gov 3.0--behavioral economics and insurance exchanges.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; David A Comerford; Eric Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Capitalism works for health care too.

Authors:  Ari Z Zivotofsky; Naomi T S Zivotofsky
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. Confronting stem cell hype.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Douglas Sipp; Charles E Murry; George Q Daley; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Default options in advance directives influence how patients set goals for end-of-life care.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; George Loewenstein; Kevin G Volpp; Elizabeth Cooney; Kelly Vranas; Caroline M Quill; Mary S McKenzie; Michael O Harhay; Nicole B Gabler; Tatiana Silva; Robert Arnold; Derek C Angus; Cindy Bryce
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  The Charter on Professionalism for Health Care Organizations.

Authors:  Barry E Egener; Diana J Mason; Walter J McDonald; Sally Okun; Martha E Gaines; David A Fleming; Bernie M Rosof; David Gullen; May-Lynn Andresen
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.