Literature DB >> 31296020

The Effects of Amplification on Listening Self-Efficacy in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Lauren Kawaguchi1, Yu-Hsiang Wu2, Christi Miller1.   

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate listening self-efficacy ratings between aided and unaided conditions in different communication environments and to determine what patient- and device-centered variables were associated with individual differences. Method An observational, cross-sectional study design was used to evaluate 165 older adults with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss who wore hearing aids at least 8 hr per week. Listening self-efficacy for both unaided and aided listening was measured using the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ; Smith, Pichora-Fuller, Watts, & La More, 2011), consisting of a global score and subscales of Dialogue in Quiet, Directed Listening, and Complex Listening. Metrics to explain variability in the degree of improvement in LSEQ ratings with aided listening included patient-centered variables of age, pure-tone average, and personality and device-centered variables of hearing aid use, speech intelligibility index, directionality, and noise reduction. The NEO Five-Factor Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1985) was used to measure 5 personality traits (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness). Associations were evaluated between LSEQ ratings and patient- and device-centered variables using a linear mixed-model analysis. Results Statistically significant improvements in LSEQ ratings were found for aided conditions (relative to unaided conditions), easier listening environments, lower pure-tone averages, and lower levels of neuroticism. Furthermore, the improvement in listening self-efficacy with hearing aids did not depend on the listening environment but did alter with severity of hearing loss, length of hearing aid use, and levels of conscientiousness. Conclusions Results of this study suggest that wearing hearing aids is associated with improved listening self-efficacy in a variety of communication environments. Aural rehabilitation and counseling may focus on improving listening self-efficacy to address the challenges of consistent hearing aid use and reduced quality of life related to hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31296020      PMCID: PMC6808314          DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  40 in total

1.  The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Development of a hearing aid self-efficacy questionnaire.

Authors:  Robin L West; Sherri L Smith
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

4.  Self-efficacy, problem solving, and social-environmental support are associated with diabetes self-management behaviors.

Authors:  Diane K King; Russell E Glasgow; Deborah J Toobert; Lisa A Strycker; Paul A Estabrooks; Diego Osuna; Andrew J Faber
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 17.152

5.  An investigation of factors that influence help-seeking for hearing impairment in older adults.

Authors:  Carly Meyer; Louise Hickson; Karen Lovelock; Michelle Lampert; Asad Khan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  How Social Psychological Factors May Modulate Auditory and Cognitive Functioning During Listening.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Sophia E Kramer; Mark A Eckert; Brent Edwards; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Larry E Humes; Ulrike Lemke; Thomas Lunner; Mohan Matthen; Carol L Mackersie; Graham Naylor; Natalie A Phillips; Michael Richter; Mary Rudner; Mitchell S Sommers; Kelly L Tremblay; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Line Vestergaard Knudsen; Marie Oberg; Claus Nielsen; Graham Naylor; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

9.  Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others.

Authors:  Patrick Stark; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Ginger A Gray
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  Importance of personality and coping expectancy on patient-reported hearing disability, quality of life and distress level: a study of patients referred to an audiology service.

Authors:  Øyvind Nordvik; Peder O Laugen Heggdal; K Jonas Brännström; Anne Kari Aarstad; Hans Jørgen Aarstad
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.186

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.