Literature DB >> 10792094

Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele.

S Cayan1, T C Kadioglu, A Tefekli, A Kadioglu, S Tellaloglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare sperm parameters, pregnancy and recurrence rates, and complications after randomized high ligation surgery versus microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy (MHIV).
METHODS: Varicocele was diagnosed by physical examination and color Doppler ultrasound in 468 patients who underwent one of two procedures: high ligation surgery (n = 232) or MHIV (n = 236). The high ligation surgery was left unilateral in 142 and bilateral in 90. The MHIV was left unilateral in 128 and bilateral in 108. The patients were postoperatively evaluated by spermiograms and physical examination. The pregnancy rate was monitored for 2 years.
RESULTS: One year after surgery, 34.05% in the high ligation group and 46.61% in the MHIV group had a more than 50% increase in their total motile sperm count (P = 0.000). The increase in sperm count was not statistically different between the two groups (P = 0.1), but the difference in the increase in sperm motility in the MHIV group was statistically significant (P = 0.000). Pregnancy rates at the end of 2 years reached 33.57% in the high ligation group and 42.85% in the MHIV group, not a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0571). The postoperative recurrence as detected by physical examination was markedly different between the two techniques. The recurrence rate was 15.51% in the high ligation group and 2.11% in the MHIV group (P = 0.000). Also, the incidence of postoperative hydrocele was significantly different between the two groups (9.09% in the high ligation group and 0.69% in the MHIV group; P = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: MHIV has lower recurrence and hydrocele rates, a higher increase in sperm motility, and results in higher pregnancy rates. Therefore, it should be the preferred technique for varicocelectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10792094     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00603-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  36 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Varicocele in adolescence: where are we now?

Authors:  Laura S Merriman; Andrew J Kirsch
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Current management of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  D A Paduch; S J Skoog
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

4.  Dr. Zini's rebuttal.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Varicocelectomy: microsurgical subinguinal technique is the treatment of choice.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  A case of scrotal venous malformation mimicking a failed varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Chong K Yi; Raffaella Derosa; Joseph R Sterbis; Brian H Ching
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-20

Review 7.  Microsurgical varicocelectomy: a review.

Authors:  Akanksha Mehta; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  A comparison between the efficacy and safety of microscopic inguinal and subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Şaban Oğuz Demirdöğen; Fatih Özkaya; Ahmet Emre Cinislioğlu; Mehmet Sefa Altay; Şenol Adanur; Özkan Polat; İsa Özbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 9.  Update on the novel management and future paternity situation in adolescents with varicocele.

Authors:  Selahittin Çayan; Murat Bozlu; Erdem Akbay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-01

10.  Microsurgical intermediate subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Song Yu; Won Sik Ham; Dong Hyuk Kang; Kyu Hyun Kim; Doo Yong Chung; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.