PURPOSE: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is similar to an open Palomo repair. Both procedures involve en masse ligation of the internal spermatic cord, and both are associated with a 1% to 3% incidence of recurrence and up to a 30% incidence of hydroceles. We sought to determine the impact of lymphatic preservation on hydrocele formation and the success of varicocelectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 191 patients with a mean age of 15.2 years who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy and at least 6 months of followup. Patients were divided into 2 groups-those who had undergone a lymphatic sparing procedure and those who had undergone a nonlymphatic sparing technique. The incidence of recurrence/persistence, postoperative hydrocele formation and postoperative hydrocele requiring surgery or aspiration was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 174 laparoscopic lymphatic sparing procedures (132 patients, 42 bilateral) and 88 nonlymphatic sparing repairs (59 patients, 29 bilateral) were performed, with a mean followup of 26.1 months. Lymphatic sparing surgery was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative hydrocele (3.4% vs 11.4%, p = 0.025). There was no significant difference in incidence of persistent or recurrent varicocele requiring reoperation following lymphatic sparing (5 sides, 2.9%) vs nonlymphatic sparing (4 sides, 4.5%) varicocelectomy (p = 0.736). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy is preferable to an open or laparoscopic Palomo repair that does not preserve the lymphatics. It has a significantly lower incidence of postoperative hydroceles, especially those requiring surgical intervention, and still maintains a low incidence of persistence/recurrence. The procedure is especially advantageous for bilateral varicocelectomy.
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is similar to an open Palomo repair. Both procedures involve en masse ligation of the internal spermatic cord, and both are associated with a 1% to 3% incidence of recurrence and up to a 30% incidence of hydroceles. We sought to determine the impact of lymphatic preservation on hydrocele formation and the success of varicocelectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 191 patients with a mean age of 15.2 years who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy and at least 6 months of followup. Patients were divided into 2 groups-those who had undergone a lymphatic sparing procedure and those who had undergone a nonlymphatic sparing technique. The incidence of recurrence/persistence, postoperative hydrocele formation and postoperative hydrocele requiring surgery or aspiration was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 174 laparoscopic lymphatic sparing procedures (132 patients, 42 bilateral) and 88 nonlymphatic sparing repairs (59 patients, 29 bilateral) were performed, with a mean followup of 26.1 months. Lymphatic sparing surgery was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative hydrocele (3.4% vs 11.4%, p = 0.025). There was no significant difference in incidence of persistent or recurrent varicocele requiring reoperation following lymphatic sparing (5 sides, 2.9%) vs nonlymphatic sparing (4 sides, 4.5%) varicocelectomy (p = 0.736). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy is preferable to an open or laparoscopic Palomo repair that does not preserve the lymphatics. It has a significantly lower incidence of postoperative hydroceles, especially those requiring surgical intervention, and still maintains a low incidence of persistence/recurrence. The procedure is especially advantageous for bilateral varicocelectomy.
Authors: Şaban Oğuz Demirdöğen; Fatih Özkaya; Ahmet Emre Cinislioğlu; Mehmet Sefa Altay; Şenol Adanur; Özkan Polat; İsa Özbey Journal: Turk J Urol Date: 2019-07-01