Literature DB >> 11245531

The distress and risk assessment method (DRAM).

J L Hobby1, L N Lutchman, J M Powell, D J Sharp.   

Abstract

Our aim was to judge the influence of preoperative psychological disturbance on the outcome of lumbar discectomy. We evaluated 66 patients, before and after operation, using a self-administered questionnaire. Disability was assessed using the Oswestry disability index and psychological disturbance the Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM) score. Patients were classified as normal, at risk or distressed, and the outcome of surgery in the three groups was compared at a follow-up of six months. The mean self-reported preoperative disability was significantly higher in those with psychological disturbance. A total of 54 patients (82%) returned completed postoperative questionnaires. Postoperative disability scores at six months were not significantly different in the three risk groups. Psychological disturbance improved after surgery. Our study suggests that the early outcome of lumbar discectomy is not affected by preoperative psychological disturbance. We conclude that a patient with a symptomatic prolapsed intervertebral disc should not be denied surgery on the basis of preoperative psychological assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11245531     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b1.10861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Decreased tibial nerve movement in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and persistent leg pain.

Authors:  G Shum; S Cinnamond; M Hutton; D Chan; R Chauhan; S Bloxham; S Choy; R Cheung; S Eldabe; A Clarke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effect of psychological status on outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Authors:  Raymond Pollock; Sandesh Lakkol; Chakra Budithi; Chandra Bhatia; Manoj Krishna
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-08-21

4.  The influence of personality traits on the subjective outcome of operative hallux valgus correction.

Authors:  Roman Radl; Andreas Leithner; Maximilian Zacherl; Ursula Lackner; Josef Egger; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Evaluation of a Dallas Pain Questionnaire classification in relation to outcome in lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Influence of psychosocial distress in the results of elective lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Vivian Amaral; Luis Marchi; Heber Martim; Rodrigo Amaral; Joes Nogueira-Neto; Ellen Pierro; Leonardo Oliveira; Etevaldo Coutinho; Fernando Marcelino; Nicholai Faulhaber; Rubens Jensen; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

7.  Failure Rate of Spine Surgeons in Preoperative Clinical Screening of Severe Psychological Disorders.

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Farhad Faridhoseini; Shahrara Ariamanesh; Mahya Hashemi Kazar; Aslan Baradaran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-05-10

8.  Role of psychological distress screening in predicting the outcomes of epidural steroid injection in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Rohit Jindal; Greg Rudol; Benjamin Okafor; Rohit Rambani
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.