Literature DB >> 12642771

Rates of advanced spinal imaging and spine surgery.

Jon D Lurie1, Nancy J Birkmeyer, James N Weinstein.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Small area analysis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between the rates of advanced spinal imaging and spine surgery across geographic areas. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The rates of spine surgery in the United States have increased along with a concurrent rise in the use of advanced spinal imaging: CT and MRI. Spine surgery rates vary six-fold across geographic areas of the United States. Differences in patient populations and health care supply have explained only about 10% of this variation.
METHODS: We used a random 5% sample of Medicare's National Claims History Part B files for 1996 and 1997 to determine procedure rates across 306 Hospital Referral Regions. We analyzed the association between spinal imaging and spine surgery using linear regression. Main outcome measures were rates of procedures and coefficients of determination (R2).
RESULTS: The rates of advanced spinal imaging (CT and MRI combined) varied 5.5-fold across geographic areas. Areas with higher rates of MRI had higher rates of spine surgery overall (r = 0.46) and spinal stenosis surgery specifically (r = 0.37). The rates of advanced spinal imaging accounted for 22% of the variability in overall spine surgery rates (R2 = 0.22, P < 0.001) and 14% of the variability in lumbar stenosis surgery rates (R2 = 0.14, P < 0.001). A simulation model showed that MRIs obtained in the patients undergoing surgery accounted for only a small part of the correlation between MRI and total spine surgery rates.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of the variation in rates of spine surgery can be explained by differences in the rates of advanced spinal imaging. The indications for advanced spinal imaging are not firmly agreed on, and the appropriateness of many of these imaging studies has been questioned. Improved consensus on the use and interpretation of advanced spinal imaging studies could have an important effect on variation in spine surgery rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12642771     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000049927.37696.DC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  66 in total

1.  The catastrophization effects of an MRI report on the patient and surgeon and the benefits of 'clinical reporting': results from an RCT and blinded trials.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; S Dilip Chand Raja; Bhari Thippeswamy Pushpa; Kumar Behera Ananda; Shetty Ajoy Prasad; Mugesh Kanna Rishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  What rate of utilization is appropriate in musculoskeletal care?

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; John Erik Bell; Jim Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Worsening trends in the management and treatment of back pain.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Ellen P McCarthy; Roger B Davis; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Chiropractic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kent Stuber; Sandy Sajko; Kevyn Kristmanson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-06

Review 5.  Drivers of surgery for the degenerative hip, knee, and spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Charles D Rosen; Nitin N Bhatia; P Douglas Kiester; Ranjan Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Imaging of lumbar degenerative disk disease: history and current state.

Authors:  Todd M Emch; Michael T Modic
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review.

Authors:  Merel Wassenaar; Rogier M van Rijn; Maurits W van Tulder; Arianne P Verhagen; Danielle A W M van der Windt; Bart W Koes; Michiel R de Boer; Abida Z Ginai; Raymond W J G Ostelo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Diagnostic relevance of pressure-controlled discography.

Authors:  Dong-Ah Shin; Hyoung-Ihl Kim; Jae-Hyun Jung; Dong-Gyu Shin; Jung-Ok Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Assessment and management of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a UK primary care musculoskeletal service: a survey of current practice among physiotherapists.

Authors:  Christine M Comer; Anthony C Redmond; Howard A Bird; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  The contribution of RCTs to quality management and their feasibility in practice.

Authors:  Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.